Xin Kang1, Mieke M Cannie2,3, Owen J Arthurs4,5, Valerie Segers6, Catherine Fourneau6, Elisa Bevilacqua1, Teresa Cos Sanchez1, Neil J Sebire4,5, Jacques C Jani7. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place A. Van Gehuchten 4, 1020, Brussels, Belgium. 2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 4. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 5. UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK. 6. Department of Fetopathology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place A. Van Gehuchten 4, 1020, Brussels, Belgium. jackjani@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare diagnostic accuracy of fetal post-mortem whole-body MRI at 3-T vs. 1.5-T. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, post-mortem MRI at 1.5-T and 3-T was performed in fetuses after miscarriage/stillbirth or termination. Clinical MRI diagnoses were assessed using a confidence diagnostic score and compared with classical autopsy to derive a diagnostic error score. The relation of diagnostic error for each organ group with gestational age was calculated and 1.5-T with 3-T was compared with accuracy analysis. RESULTS: 135 fetuses at 12-41 weeks underwent post-mortem MRI (followed by conventional autopsy in 92 fetuses). For all organ groups except the brain, and for both modalities, the diagnostic error decreased with gestation (P < 0.0001). 3-T MRI diagnostic error was significantly lower than that of 1.5-T for all anatomic structures and organ groups, except the orbits and brain. This difference was maintained for fetuses <20 weeks gestation. Moreover, 3-T was associated with fewer non-diagnostic scans and greater concordance with classical autopsy than 1.5-T MRI, especially for the thorax, heart and abdomen in fetuses <20 weeks. CONCLUSION: Post-mortem fetal 3-T MRI improves confidence scores and overall accuracy compared with 1.5-T, mainly for the thorax, heart and abdomen of fetuses <20 weeks of gestation. KEY POINTS: • In PM-MRI, diagnostic error using 3-T is lower than that with 1.5-T. • In PM-MRI, diagnostic scan rate is higher using 3-T than 1.5-T. • In PM-MRI, concordance with classical autopsy increases with 3-T. • PM-MRI using 3-T is particularly interesting for thoracic and abdominal organs. • PM-MRI using 3-T is particularly interesting for fetuses < 20 weeks' gestation.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare diagnostic accuracy of fetal post-mortem whole-body MRI at 3-T vs. 1.5-T. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, post-mortem MRI at 1.5-T and 3-T was performed in fetuses after miscarriage/stillbirth or termination. Clinical MRI diagnoses were assessed using a confidence diagnostic score and compared with classical autopsy to derive a diagnostic error score. The relation of diagnostic error for each organ group with gestational age was calculated and 1.5-T with 3-T was compared with accuracy analysis. RESULTS: 135 fetuses at 12-41 weeks underwent post-mortem MRI (followed by conventional autopsy in 92 fetuses). For all organ groups except the brain, and for both modalities, the diagnostic error decreased with gestation (P < 0.0001). 3-T MRI diagnostic error was significantly lower than that of 1.5-T for all anatomic structures and organ groups, except the orbits and brain. This difference was maintained for fetuses <20 weeks gestation. Moreover, 3-T was associated with fewer non-diagnostic scans and greater concordance with classical autopsy than 1.5-T MRI, especially for the thorax, heart and abdomen in fetuses <20 weeks. CONCLUSION: Post-mortem fetal 3-T MRI improves confidence scores and overall accuracy compared with 1.5-T, mainly for the thorax, heart and abdomen of fetuses <20 weeks of gestation. KEY POINTS: • In PM-MRI, diagnostic error using 3-T is lower than that with 1.5-T. • In PM-MRI, diagnostic scan rate is higher using 3-T than 1.5-T. • In PM-MRI, concordance with classical autopsy increases with 3-T. • PM-MRI using 3-T is particularly interesting for thoracic and abdominal organs. • PM-MRI using 3-T is particularly interesting for fetuses < 20 weeks' gestation.
Authors: C Votino; M Cannie; V Segers; O Dobrescu; H Dessy; V Gallo; T Cos; N Damry; J Jani Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: C Votino; J Jani; M Verhoye; B Bessieres; Y Fierens; V Segers; A Vorsselmans; X Kang; T Cos; W Foulon; J De Mey; M Cannie Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Sudhin Thayyil; Jon O Cleary; Neil J Sebire; Rosemary J Scott; Kling Chong; Roxanna Gunny; Catherine M Owens; Oystein E Olsen; Amaka C Offiah; Harold G Parks; Lyn S Chitty; Anthony N Price; Tarek A Yousry; Nicola J Robertson; Mark F Lythgoe; Andrew M Taylor Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Inga Sandaite; Steven Dymarkowski; Luc De Catte; Philippe Moerman; Marc Gewillig; Luigi Fedele; Jan Deprest; Filip Claus Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Sudhin Thayyil; Neil J Sebire; Lyn S Chitty; Angie Wade; Wk Chong; Oystein Olsen; Roxana S Gunny; Amaka C Offiah; Catherine M Owens; Dawn E Saunders; Rosemary J Scott; Rod Jones; Wendy Norman; Shea Addison; Alan Bainbridge; Ernest B Cady; Enrico De Vita; Nicola J Robertson; Andrew M Taylor Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ian C Simcock; Susan C Shelmerdine; J Ciaran Hutchinson; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Susan C Shelmerdine; Cheryl Main; John Ciaran Hutchinson; Dean Langan; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Anna Hellkvist; Johan Wikström; Ajlana Mulic-Lutvica; Katharina Ericson; Christopher Eriksson-Falkerby; Peter Lindgren; Eva Penno; Ove Axelsson Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2019-03-03 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Susan Cheng Shelmerdine; Dean Langan; Uday Mandalia; Neil James Sebire; Owen John Arthurs Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Susan C Shelmerdine; J Ciaran Hutchinson; Celine Lewis; Ian C Simcock; Thivya Sekar; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2021-07-15
Authors: Aurélie D'Hondt; Marie Cassart; Raymond De Maubeuge; Gustavo Soto Ares; Jacques Rommens; E Fred Avni Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2018-06-04