Literature DB >> 12202996

Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique.

Sanne J Gordijn1, Jan Jaap H M Erwich, T Yee Khong.   

Abstract

In consenting to a perinatal autopsy, the primary motive of parents may be to find the exact cause of death. A critical review on the value of perinatal autopsies was performed to see whether parents could be counseled regarding their main motive. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EXCERPTA MEDICA, and the Cochrane library. We evaluated the value of the autopsy by comparing the clinical and autopsy diagnoses in stillbirths, neonatal deaths, and therapeutic terminations. Clinicopathologic concordance was divided into four categories: (1) change in diagnosis, (2) additional findings, (3) complete confirmation, and (4) inconclusive. We sought information on factors that may influence the value of perinatal autopsies: the type and definitions of perinatal loss; autopsy rate; level of hospital; expertise of pathologists; autopsy protocol used; whether patients were inborn or referred; and antenatal diagnosis. From the 27 articles that met our review criteria, the autopsy revealed a change in diagnosis or additional findings in 22% to 76% of cases. If confirmation of clinical findings is included, then the value of the perinatal autopsy was as high as up to 100%. Factors that could influence this rate were reported variably by investigators. When centers report their experience of the value of the perinatal autopsy, information on the factors that may influence their reports should be provided as well. Clinicians can confidently advise parents of the usefulness of the perinatal autopsy in ascertaining the cause of death or for counseling their future pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202996     DOI: 10.1007/s10024-002-0008-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol        ISSN: 1093-5266


  23 in total

Review 1.  Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused.

Authors:  C Wright; R E J Lee
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Perinatal and infant autopsy.

Authors:  R Adappa; S Paranjothy; Z Roberts; P H T Cartlidge
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Evaluation of forensic perinatal and neonatal autopsies in Istanbul.

Authors:  Erdem Ozkara; Gurol Canturk; Nergis Canturk; A Bulent Ozata; M Fatih Yavuz
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Diagnostic utility of autopsy in a university hospital in Iran.

Authors:  Payman Salamati; Afshin Abdi-Rad; Mehdi Ale-Hossein; Soheila Sarmadi; Kambiz Sotoudeh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  A comparison between clinical diagnosis of death and autopsy diagnosis. A retrospective study of 131 newborns, stillborns and aborted fetuses.

Authors:  Mariana Costache; Monica Cirstoiu; Andreea Contolenco; Anca Mihaela Lazaroiu; Simion George; Maria Sajin; Oana Maria Patrascu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-06

6.  Evaluation of an active surveillance system for stillbirths in metropolitan Atlanta.

Authors:  Alejandro Azofeifa; Lorraine F Yeung; C Wes Duke; Suzanne M Gilboa; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2012

7.  Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy.

Authors:  Dell Horey; Vicki Flenady; Liz Conway; Emma McLeod; Teck Yee Khong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Emerging Lingo-Cultural Inequality in Infant Autopsy in Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Marianne Bilodeau-Bertrand; André Costopoulos
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-04

9.  Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy.

Authors:  Xin Kang; Mieke M Cannie; Owen J Arthurs; Valerie Segers; Catherine Fourneau; Elisa Bevilacqua; Teresa Cos Sanchez; Neil J Sebire; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications.

Authors:  Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.