Literature DB >> 25043483

Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem MRI for musculoskeletal abnormalities in fetuses and children.

Owen J Arthurs1, Sudhin Thayyil, Shea Addison, Angie Wade, Rod Jones, Wendy Norman, Rosemary Scott, Nicola J Robertson, Lyn S Chitty, Andrew M Taylor, Neil J Sebire, Amaka C Offiah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of postmortem magnetic resonance (PMMR) imaging specifically for musculoskeletal pathology in fetuses and children, compared with conventional autopsy, with radiographic and histopathology assessment.
METHODS: Institutional ethics approval and parental consent was obtained. A total of 400 cases underwent PMMR using a 1.5 T Siemens Avanto MR scanner before conventional autopsy. PMMR images and autopsy findings were reported blinded to the other data, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 400 cases were reported, with 277 (69%) fetuses (185 ≤24 weeks' gestation and 92 >24 weeks' gestation) and 123 children (42 newborns aged <1 month, 53 infants ≤12 months and 28 children ≤16 years). Musculoskeletal (MSK) abnormalities were found at autopsy in 47/400 (11.7%). Overall sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence interval) of PMMR for MSK pathology were 51.1% (37.0, 65.0) and 98.2% (96.2, 99.2), with positive and negative predictive values of 79.3% (61.6, 90.2) and 93.8% (90.8, 95.9), respectively. Overall accuracy between PMMR and autopsy for MSK abnormalities was 92.7% (89.7, 94.9). In some cases, PMMR detected MSK abnormalities not routinely examined for or detected at traditional autopsy.
CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive autopsy has good diagnostic accuracy for the exclusion of MSK abnormalities, but sensitivity is relatively poor. When PMMR is used with clinical examination and skeletal radiographs, all skeletal and soft tissue abnormalities of clinical significance are likely to be detected, even if not directly relevant to the cause of death.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25043483     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  9 in total

1.  Post-mortem magnetic resonance foetal imaging: a study of morphological correlation with conventional autopsy and histopathological findings.

Authors:  Annamaria Vullo; Valeria Panebianco; Giuseppe Cannavale; Mariarosaria Aromatario; Luigi Cipolloni; Paola Frati; Alessandro Santurro; Francesco Vullo; Carlo Catalano; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy.

Authors:  Xin Kang; Mieke M Cannie; Owen J Arthurs; Valerie Segers; Catherine Fourneau; Elisa Bevilacqua; Teresa Cos Sanchez; Neil J Sebire; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Dutch guideline for clinical foetal-neonatal and paediatric post-mortem radiology, including a review of literature.

Authors:  L J P Sonnemans; M E M Vester; E E M Kolsteren; J J H M Erwich; P G J Nikkels; P A M Kint; R R van Rijn; W M Klein
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Health professionals' and coroners' views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Owen J Arthurs; John C Hutchinson; Lyn S Chitty; Neil Sebire
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): radiological-pathological correlation.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 6.  Perinatal death investigations: What is current practice?

Authors:  J W Nijkamp; N J Sebire; K Bouman; F J Korteweg; J J H M Erwich; S J Gordijn
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?

Authors:  Aurélie D'Hondt; Marie Cassart; Raymond De Maubeuge; Gustavo Soto Ares; Jacques Rommens; E Fred Avni
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-06-04

8.  Current state of perinatal postmortem magnetic resonance imaging: European Society of Paediatric Radiology questionnaire-based survey and recommendations.

Authors:  Elspeth Whitby; Amaka C Offiah; Susan C Shelmerdine; Rick R van Rijn; Michael Aertsen; Willemijn M Klein; David Perry; Stacy K Goergen; Christian Abel; Ajay Taranath; Dominic Gascho; Elka Miller; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-12-23

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem ultrasound vs postmortem 1.5-T MRI for non-invasive perinatal autopsy.

Authors:  S C Shelmerdine; N J Sebire; O J Arthurs
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.299

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.