Zhiwei Ren1,2, An Liu1,3, Kaixiang Yang1,4, Dalin Wang1,5, Zorica Buser6, Jeffrey C Wang1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elaine Stevely Hoffman Medical Research Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, HMR 710, 2011 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China. 3. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. 5. Department of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Nanjing Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elaine Stevely Hoffman Medical Research Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, HMR 710, 2011 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. zbuser@usc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the changes of lumbar neural foramina size during dynamic motion using positional MRI. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty neural foramina from 50 patients were analyzed. Lumbar foraminal height, width, and area parameters from L1 to S1 were evaluated for changes in extension, neutral, and flexion positions on T2 parasagittal positional MRI images, and were correlated to lumbar angular motion. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc analysis were used to examine the differences between levels and positions. RESULTS: Compared to the neutral position, almost all lumbar foraminal parameters (height, width at inferior level, and area) increased in flexion and decreased in extension at all levels, except for L5-S1 foraminal width at superior and middle levels. The foraminal height and area in all lumbar segments except L5-S1 increased as the lumbar angular motion changed from extension to flexion in <40° group. The foraminal width increased significantly at L3-4 and L4-5 among all groups. CONCLUSION: Lumbar foraminal dimensions increased in flexion compared to neutral and extension positions. Lumbar angular motion contributed to the changes of foraminal height and area at most of the segments, while it affected foraminal width only at L3-4 and L4-5. This information can be useful in the understanding of patient symptoms and the correlation with the imaging studies with dynamic foraminal stenosis. Furthermore, data from our study may help with patient positioning for foraminal injections or endoscopic surgery.
PURPOSE: To investigate the changes of lumbar neural foramina size during dynamic motion using positional MRI. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty neural foramina from 50 patients were analyzed. Lumbar foraminal height, width, and area parameters from L1 to S1 were evaluated for changes in extension, neutral, and flexion positions on T2 parasagittal positional MRI images, and were correlated to lumbar angular motion. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc analysis were used to examine the differences between levels and positions. RESULTS: Compared to the neutral position, almost all lumbar foraminal parameters (height, width at inferior level, and area) increased in flexion and decreased in extension at all levels, except for L5-S1 foraminal width at superior and middle levels. The foraminal height and area in all lumbar segments except L5-S1 increased as the lumbar angular motion changed from extension to flexion in <40° group. The foraminal width increased significantly at L3-4 and L4-5 among all groups. CONCLUSION: Lumbar foraminal dimensions increased in flexion compared to neutral and extension positions. Lumbar angular motion contributed to the changes of foraminal height and area at most of the segments, while it affected foraminal width only at L3-4 and L4-5. This information can be useful in the understanding of patient symptoms and the correlation with the imaging studies with dynamic foraminal stenosis. Furthermore, data from our study may help with patient positioning for foraminal injections or endoscopic surgery.
Authors: A A Zamani; T Moriarty; L Hsu; C S Winalski; J L Schaffer; H Isbister; J F Schenck; K W Rohling; F Jolesz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1998 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mehmet Arslan; Ayhan Cömert; Halil İbrahim Açar; Mevci Ozdemir; Alaittin Elhan; Ibrahim Tekdemir; R Shane Tubbs; Hasan Çağlar Uğur Journal: Clin Anat Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Kyung-Chul Choi; June-Ho Lee; Jin-Sung Kim; Luigi Andrew Sabal; Sol Lee; Ho Kim; Sang-Ho Lee Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Yvonne Yan On Lau; Ryan Ka Lok Lee; James Francis Griffith; Carol Lai Yee Chan; Sheung Wai Law; Kin On Kwok Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.134