Literature DB >> 29222690

Risk factor of contralateral radiculopathy following microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Yang Yang1, Zhong-Yu Liu1, Liang-Ming Zhang1, Jian-Wen Dong1, Pei-Gen Xie1, Rui-Qiang Chen1, Bu Yang1, Chang Liu1, Bin Liu2, Li-Min Rong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is an advantageous method for treating lumbar degenerative disease; however, some patients show contralateral radiculopathy postoperatively. This study aims to investigate its risk factor.
METHODS: A total of 130 cases who underwent microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF at L4-5 level were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups according to the presence of postoperative contralateral radiculopathy. Both preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, as well as their changes were compared between the two groups, including lumbar lordosis (LL), surgical segmental angle (SSA), disc height (DH), contralateral foramen area (CFA) and contralateral canal area (CCA). Screw breach on contralateral L4 pedicle and decompression method (ipsilateral or bilateral canal decompression through unilateral route) were also analyzed as potential risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn for the risk factor to determine the optimal threshold for predicting postoperative contralateral radiculopathy. Besides, clinical outcome assessment, involving Visual Analog Score (VAS) for back and leg, Japanese Orthopaedics Association Score (JOA) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), was also compared between the two groups before surgery and at final follow-up (at least 3 months after the surgery for asymptomatic patients or final treatments of contralateral radiculopathy for symptomatic cases).
RESULTS: Postoperative contralateral radiculopathy occurred in 11 (8.5%) of the 130 patients. Both preoperative and postoperative CFA as well as its change were significantly decreased in symptomatic group compared with asymptomatic group (all P < 0.05). For the remaining four parameters (LL, SSA, DH, CCA), their preoperative, postoperative and change values showed no statistical difference between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Neither screw breach nor decompression method revealed statistical association with this complication (both P > 0.05). Based on ROC curve, the optimal threshold of preoperative CFA was 0.76 cm2. At final follow-up, significant improvement in VAS (back and leg), JOA and ODI was observed in both groups compared with preoperative baseline (all P < 0.05), while no difference was found between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative contralateral foramen stenosis is the risk factor of contralateral radiculopathy following microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF. If preoperative CFA at L4-5 level is not larger than 0.76 cm2, prophylactic measures, including both indirect and direct decompression of contralateral foramen, are recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contralateral; Minimally invasive surgery; Radiculopathy; Risk factor; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29222690     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5417-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes.

Authors:  Yang Lin; Wenjian Chen; Anmin Chen; Feng Li
Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 1.268

3.  Can unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion attain indirect contralateral decompression? A preliminary report of 66 MRI analysis.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Jeong-Uk Park; Woo-Chul Kim; Hong-Seok Lee; Hung-Tae Chung; Moo-Won Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

5.  Unilateral approach for bilateral foramen decompression in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jiann-Her Lin; Yung-Hsiao Chiang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Travis Hunt; Francis H Shen; Christopher I Shaffrey; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience.

Authors:  Akshay Hari; Murali Krishna; Santhosh Rajagandhi; Deshpande V Rajakumar
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Bin Liu; Li-Min Rong; Rui-Qiang Chen; Jian-Wen Dong; Pei-Gen Xie; Liang-Ming Zhang; Feng Feng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

9.  Acute Contralateral Radiculopathy after Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kyoung-Min Jang; Seung-Won Park; Young-Baeg Kim; Yong-Sook Park; Taek-Kyun Nam; Young-Seok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

10.  Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Jae-Sung Yoo; Jun-Yeul Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Comparative study of microendoscope-assisted and conventional minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases].

Authors:  Jianwen Dong; Yang Yang; Zihao Chen; Mingzhu Yu; Bin Liu; Qiyou Wang; Peigen Xie; Ruiqiang Chen; Limin Rong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

2.  CHANGES IN THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAL SEGMENT RELATED TO THE CAGE POSITION IN TLIF TECHNIQUE.

Authors:  Thiago Dantas Matos; Rodrigo Barra Caiado Fleury; Kelsen DE Oliveira Teixeira; Valéria Romero; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.

Authors:  Sara Lener; Christoph Wipplinger; R Nick Hernandez; Ibrahim Hussain; Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Eliana Kim; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.