Literature DB >> 18978580

Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine.

Masashi Miyazaki1, Henry J Hymanson, Yuichiro Morishita, Wubing He, Haihong Zhang, Guizhong Wu, Min Ho Kong, Hiroshi Tsumura, Jeffrey C Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis using kinetic magnetic resonance images (MRIs).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of changes in the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine on the kinematics of the functional motion unit and disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Normal lordotic alignment is one of the most important factors contributing to effective motion and function of the cervical spine. Loss of normal lordotic alignment may induce pathologic changes in the kinematics and accelerate degeneration of the functional motion unit. However, the relationship of altered alignment on kinematics and degeneration has not been evaluated.
METHODS: Kinetic MRIs in flexion, neutral, and extension were performed. Study participants were classified into 5 groups based on the C1-C7 Cobb angle of sagittal alignment--Group A: Kyphosis (n = 19), Group B: Straight (n = 29), Group C: Hypolordosis (n = 38), Group D: Normal (n = 63), and Group E: Hyperlordosis (n = 52).Intervertebral disc degeneration was graded (Grades 1-5), and the kinematics of the functional spinal unit were obtained.
RESULTS: When the alignment shifted from normal to less lordotic, the translational motion and angular variation tended to decrease at all levels. The contribution of the C1-C2, C2-C3, and C3-C4 levels to total angular mobility tended to be higher in Group C than Group D. However, the contribution of the C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 levels tended to be lower in Group C than in Group D. The grade of disc degeneration associated with loss of lordosis tended to be higher than that associated with normal alignment at the C2-C3 and C3-C4 levels.
CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that the changes in sagittal alignment of the cervical spine affect the kinematics. Consequently, it may cause changes in the segment subjected to maximum load for overall motion and accelerate its degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978580     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181839733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Stavroula Pagkrati; Danilo Leonetti; Maria Teresa Miscione; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Haiqing Mao; Jing-Sheng Li; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Liming Cheng; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li; Thomas D Cha
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Missed cervical disc bulges diagnosed with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lifeng Lao; Michael D Daubs; Trevor P Scott; Kevin H Phan; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Interest of T1 parameters for sagittal alignment evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  S Pesenti; B Blondel; E Peltier; E Choufani; G Bollini; J L Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Can multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging be used to evaluate angular parameters in cervical spine? A comparison of multi-positional MRI to dynamic plain radiograph.

Authors:  Permsak Paholpak; Koji Tamai; Kyle Shoell; Kittipong Sessumpun; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Correlation and differences in cervical sagittal alignment parameters between cervical radiographs and magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Masahito Oshina; Masashi Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima; Sakae Tanaka; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbosacral sagittal alignment in association to intervertebral disc diseases.

Authors:  Zohreh Habibi; Farid Maleki; Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Ali Mahdavi; Hooshang Saberi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-12-17

8.  Evaluation of changes in lumbar neuroforaminal dimensions in symptomatic young adults using positional MRI.

Authors:  Zhiwei Ren; An Liu; Kaixiang Yang; Dalin Wang; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Effect of Modic changes on spinal canal stenosis and segmental motion in cervical spine.

Authors:  Tetsuo Hayashi; Michael D Daubs; Akinobu Suzuki; Kevin Phan; Keiichiro Shiba; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery.

Authors:  Yoon Ha; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Gregory Mundis; Christopher Shaffrey; Justin Smith; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.