Literature DB >> 28111725

Cost-effectiveness of a new system in ruling out negative urine cultures on the day of administration.

A Ilki1, R Ayas2, S Ozsoy2, G Soyletir2.   

Abstract

Urine samples account for a significant part of the workload in clinical microbiology laboratories. However, the culture process is time-consuming and a large proportion is reported as negative. To reduce unnecessary culture procedures and speed up the reporting of negative results, a reliable screening method is needed. For this purpose, urine samples submitted to our clinical microbiology laboratory were simultaneously screened by a flow cytometry method (Sysmex UF-1000i, Japan). During screening, the evaluation of various combinations of leucocytes and bacteria cut-offs demonstrated that cut-offs of 30 and 50/μL, respectively, were the best threshold values to reach a 100% negative predictive value (NPV) with a culture reduction rate of 44.8% in adults and 61.9% in children between the ages of 6 and 17 years. With the culture reduction rates mentioned above, the screening method has provided at least 24% savings in expenditures of the routine clinical microbiology laboratory. Since we did not reach such an NPV with any combinations of screening parameters in children younger than 5 years of age, we recommend cultivation of all urine samples in those patients without a screening step. In conclusion, Sysmex UF-1000i as a screening method was capable of improving the efficiency of the routine microbiology laboratory by providing negative results in a few minutes in children greater than 6 years of age and in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111725     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2898-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  17 in total

1.  Performance of the Sysmex UF1000i system in screening for significant bacteriuria before quantitative culture of aerobic/facultative fast-growth bacteria in a reference hospital.

Authors:  J Gutiérrez-Fernández; A Lara; M F Bautista; J de Dios Luna; P Polo; C Miranda; J M Navarro
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Fabio Manoni; Lucia Fornasiero; Mauro Ercolin; Agostino Tinello; Melissa Ferrian; Paolo Hoffer; Sara Valverde; Gianluca Gessoni
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Screening for urinary tract infection with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer.

Authors:  Maarten A C Broeren; Semiha Bahçeci; Huib L Vader; Niek L A Arents
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  UF-1000i flow cytometry is an effective screening method for urine specimens.

Authors:  Kamran Kadkhoda; Kanchana Manickam; Pat Degagne; Pat Sokolowski; Paulette Pang; Nick Kontzie; Michelle Alfa
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Technical notes on the correct configuration of the Alfred 60/AST device for the detection of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Gianpiero Spezzotti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Enumeration of bacterial cell numbers and detection of significant bacteriuria by use of a new flow cytometry-based device.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okada; Toshiro Shirakawa; Akinobu Gotoh; Yutaka Kamiyama; Satoru Muto; Hisamitsu Ide; Yukio Hamaguchi; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; S N Shaffer; B B Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Evaluation of BiesseBioscreen as a new methodology for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  Eleonora Nicolai; Simona Garau; Cartesio Favalli; Cartesio D'Agostini; Enrico Gratton; Guido Motolese; Nicola Rosato
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Detection of urinary tract infections by rapid methods.

Authors:  M Pezzlo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Screening of presumptive urinary tract infections by the automated urine sediment analyser sediMAX.

Authors:  Andrea Tessari; Nicoletta Osti; Marino Scarin
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  A new concept and a comprehensive evaluation of SYSMEX UF-1000i  flow cytometer to identify culture-negative urine specimens in patients with UTI.

Authors:  T Monsen; P Ryden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Automated Flow Cytometry: An Alternative to Urine Culture in a Routine Clinical Microbiology Laboratory?

Authors:  Patricia Mejuto; Mariam Luengo; Julio Díaz-Gigante
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.