Literature DB >> 28111695

Source-to-detector distance and beam center do not affect radiographic measurements of acetabular morphology.

Ashton H Goldman1, Kevin B Hoover2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multiple radiographic acquisition techniques have been evaluated for their effect on measurements of acetabular morphology. This cadaveric study examined the effect of two acquisition parameters not previously evaluated: beam center position and source-to-detector distance. This study also evaluated the effect of reader differences on measurements.
METHODS: Following calibration of measurements between two readers using five clinical radiographs (training), radiographs were obtained from two cadavers using four different source-to-detector distances and three different radiographic centers for a total of 12 radiographic techniques (experimental). Two physician readers acquired four types of measurements from each cadaver radiograph: lateral center edge angle, peak-to-edge distance, Sharp's angle, and the Tonnis angle. All measurements were evaluated for intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa statistics for hip dysplasia, and factors that resulted in measurement differences using a mixed statistical model.
RESULTS: After training of the two physician readers, there was strong agreement in their hip morphology measurements (ICC 0.84-0.93), agreement in the presence of hip dysplasia (κ = 0.58-1.0), and no measurement difference between physician readers (p = 0.12-1.0). Experimental cadaver measurements showed moderate-to-strong agreement of the readers (ICC 0.74-0.93) and complete agreement on dysplasia (κ = 1). After accounting for reader and radiographic technique, there was no difference in hip morphology measurements (p = 0.83-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric study, measurements of hip morphology were not affected by varying source-to-detector distance or beam center. We conclude that these acquisition parameters are not likely to affect the diagnosis of hip dysplasia in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular morphology; Hip dysplasia; Parallax; Radiographic center; Source-to-film distance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111695     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2571-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  19 in total

1.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Franco Impellizzeri; Stephan Keller; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays--a comparison of six parameters.

Authors:  M Tannast; S B Murphy; F Langlotz; S E Anderson; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults.

Authors:  D Tönnis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults.

Authors:  Lene B Laborie; Trude G Lehmann; Ingvild Ø Engesæter; Deborah M Eastwood; Lars B Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Reliability of radiographic parameters in adults with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Terje Terjesen; Ragnhild B Gunderson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Lequesne; J Malghem; E Dion
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Now you see it, now you don't: visual illusions in radiology.

Authors:  Christopher E Buckle; Viyan Udawatta; Christopher M Straus
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  1 in total

1.  Complete Circumferential Osseous Extension in the Acetabular Rim Occurs Regardless of Acetabular Coverage.

Authors:  Keisuke Watarai; Fumihiko Kimura; Yuho Kadono; Yoon Taek Kim; Mamoru Niitsu; Hiromi Oda; Hirohiko Azuma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.