Literature DB >> 28512691

Complete Circumferential Osseous Extension in the Acetabular Rim Occurs Regardless of Acetabular Coverage.

Keisuke Watarai1, Fumihiko Kimura1, Yuho Kadono1, Yoon Taek Kim1, Mamoru Niitsu2, Hiromi Oda3, Hirohiko Azuma1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim has been reported to occur in the deep hip with pincer impingement. However, this phenomenon occasionally is observed in dysplastic hips without pincer impingement, and the degree to which this finding might or might not be associated with hip pain, and how often it occurs bilaterally among patients, are not well characterized. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To determine the proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim using three-dimensional (3-D) CT in patients with and without hip pain who had CT scans obtained for various reasons. (2) To elucidate how often this complete circumferential osseous extension occurred bilaterally among those patients. (3) To investigate the relationship between the proportions of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension observed on CT scans among three different acetabular coverage groups: dysplasia, normal, and overcoverage. (4) To determine how often the finding of hip pain was associated with complete circumferential osseous extension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2011 to July 2016, we evaluated 3788 patients with pelvic complaints such as hip, groin, thigh, buttock, or sacroiliac joint pain. We obtained consent from 26% (992 of 3788) of them, and obtained 3-D CT scans as part of that evaluation. For the current retrospective study, we excluded patients younger than 20 years or 80 years or older (181 patients), patients who had previous hip surgery (185 patients), patients with severe osteoarthritis with Tönnis Grades 2 or 3 (301 patients), and patients who could not have an accurate lateral center-edge (LCE) angle measured owing to poor-quality radiographs (24 patients), leaving 301 patients (602 hips) for this analysis. In this study population, patients reported pain in 131 hips (22%), defined as all types of hip pain except for trauma, including activity pain, pain with sports, pain on motion, and impingement pain; the others did not report hip pain. The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 16 years, and the mean LCE angle was 26° ± 8° (range, -9° to 47°). We first determined the proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim using 3-D CT for those with and without hip pain who had CT obtained for various reasons. We next elucidated how often this complete circumferential osseous extension occurred bilaterally among the patients, and finally we investigated the relationship between the proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension observed on CT scans among the three groups: dysplasia (defined as LCE angles of 22° or smaller), normal, and overcoverage (defined as LCE angles of 34° or larger) groups. We finally determined how often the finding was associated with hip pain attributable to complete circumferential osseous extension.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension was 6% (18 of 301 patients). Eighty-nine percent (16 of 18) of the patients had bilateral complete circumferential osseous extension. There were no differences in the proportions of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension among the three groups: 5.3% (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.45-2.31; p = 0.97), 5.3%, and 7.4% (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.28-1.73; p = 0.44) in the dysplasia, normal, and overcoverage groups, respectively, with the numbers available. Eighteen percent (six of 34) of the hips with complete circumferential osseous extension had pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim is relatively uncommon. When it occurs, it usually is bilateral, it occurs regardless of acetabular coverage, and it is associated with pain in a minority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28512691      PMCID: PMC5498392          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5381-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Franco Impellizzeri; Stephan Keller; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Sapan Mistry; Simon D Steppacher; Stephan Reichenbach; Frank Langlotz; Klaus A Siebenrock; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Bone apposition of the acetabular rim in deep hips: a distinct finding of global pincer impingement.

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Reinhold Ganz; Etsuo Chosa; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Markus S Hanke; Guoyan Zheng; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria.

Authors:  S van der Linden; H A Valkenburg; A Cats
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1984-04

7.  [Aging process of the acetabulum with special reference to the osteophyte formation (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Azuma; K Kako; Y Itoigawa
Journal:  Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1980-02

8.  Surgical Outcome of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement With and Without Labral Ossification.

Authors:  J W Thomas Byrd; Kay S Jones; Carl R Freeman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  M Beck; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

10.  Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan.

Authors:  S Nakamura; S Ninomiya; T Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Acetabular posterior wall morphology. A CT-based method to distinguish two acetabular posterior wall types.

Authors:  Tilman Graulich; Pascal Graeff; Stine Nicolaides; Marco Haertle; Mohamed Omar; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.