Literature DB >> 21613440

Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults.

Lene B Laborie1, Trude G Lehmann, Ingvild Ø Engesæter, Deborah M Eastwood, Lars B Engesæter, Karen Rosendahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of qualitative radiographic findings for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and associations among them and to characterize the inter- and intraobserver variability of these interpretations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is part of an institutional review board-approved population-based prospective follow-up of 2081 of 4006 (participation rate, 51.9%) young adults (874 [42.0%] male participants, 1207 [58.0%] female participants; mean age, 18.6 years) who took part in a randomized hip trial on developmental dysplasia of the hip. All participants gave informed consent. Two pelvic radiographs were obtained. Pistol-grip deformity, focal femoral neck prominence, and flattening of the lateral head, all suggestive of cam-type impingement, and the posterior wall sign, excessive acetabular coverage, and crossover sign, all suggestive of pincer-type impingement, were assessed subjectively by an experienced radiologist. To assess inter- and intraobserver agreement, images from 350 examinations were read independently twice by two observers.
RESULTS: Cam-type deformities were seen in 868 male and 1192 female participants, respectively, as follows: pistol-grip deformity, 187 (21.5%) and 39 (3.3%); focal femoral neck prominence, 89 (10.3%) and 31 (2.6%); and flattening of the lateral femoral head, 125 (14.4%) and 74 (6.2%). Pincer-type deformities were seen in the same numbers of male and female participants, respectively, as follows: posterior wall sign, 203 (23.4%) and 131 (11.0%); and excessive acetabular coverage, 127 (14.6%) and 58 (4.9%) (all P < .001, according to sex distribution). The crossover sign was seen in 446 (51.4%) and 542 (45.5%) of the male and female participants, respectively (P = .004). There was a high degree of coexistence (odds ratio [OR] > 2) among most FAI findings. Interobserver agreement was good to very good (κ = 0.74-0.84) in rating cam- and pincer-type findings. Intraobserver agreement was moderate or good (κ = 0.49-0.80) for all findings for both observers.
CONCLUSION: Overall, radiographic FAI findings are quite common in a population of healthy young adults, especially in males, with a high degree of coexistence among most findings (OR > 2). © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21613440     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11102354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  65 in total

1.  Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Gennaro Fiorentino; Alberto Fontanarosa; Riccardo Cepparulo; Alberto Guardoli; Luca Berni; Gianluca Coviello; Aldo Guardoli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

2.  Correlation of alpha angle between various radiographic projections and radial magnetic resonance imaging for cam deformity in femoral head-neck junction.

Authors:  Masayoshi Saito; Sachiyuki Tsukada; Kazuki Yoshida; Yasuaki Okada; Atsushi Tasaki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population.

Authors:  F de Bruin; M Reijnierse; V Farhang-Razi; J L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Source-to-detector distance and beam center do not affect radiographic measurements of acetabular morphology.

Authors:  Ashton H Goldman; Kevin B Hoover
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  The effect of femoro-acetabular impingement on the kinematics and kinetics of the hip joint.

Authors:  Zeiad Alshameeri; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Herniation pits as a radiographic indicator of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Ji; Ji-Hoon Baek; Kyoung-Woon Kim; Ji-Woong Yoon; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips.

Authors:  Marianne Lepage-Saucier; Cécile Thiéry; Ahmed Larbi; Frédéric E Lecouvet; Bruno C Vande Berg; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Three-dimensional osteogenic and chondrogenic systems to model osteochondral physiology and degenerative joint diseases.

Authors:  Peter G Alexander; Riccardo Gottardi; Hang Lin; Thomas P Lozito; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.