Literature DB >> 28111179

Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders.

Brent Mollon1, Siddharth A Mahure1, Christopher P Roche2, Joseph D Zuckerman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although its clinical implications are unclear and remains controversial.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed rTSA patients of a single implant design in 476 shoulders with a minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clinical measures included active range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, in addition to one or more of the Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale. Complications and rates of humeral radiolucencies were also recorded.
RESULTS: Scapular notching was observed in 10.1% (48 of 476) of rTSAs and was associated with a longer clinical follow-up, lower body weight, lower body mass index, and when the operative side was the nondominant extremity. Patients with scapular notching had significantly lower postoperative scores on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California, Los Angeles, Shoulder Rating Scale compared with patients without scapular notching. Patients with scapular notching also had significantly lower active abduction, significantly less strength, and trended toward significantly less active forward flexion (P = .0527). Finally, patients with scapular notching had a significantly higher complication rate and trended toward a significantly higher rate of humeral radiolucent lines (P = .0896) than patients without scapular notching.
CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale outcome study demonstrates that patients with scapular notching have significantly poorer clinical outcomes, significantly less strength and active range of motion, and a significantly higher complication rate than patients without scapular notching. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to confirm that these statistical observations in the short-term will result in greater clinically meaningful differences over time.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scapular notching; arthroplasty; clinical outcomes; complications; rTSA; retrospective

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111179     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  44 in total

1.  Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Spiry; J Berhouet; C Agout; G Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Classifications in Brief: The Nerot-Sirveaux Classification for Scapular Notching.

Authors:  Bradley L Young; Colin K Cantrell; Nady Hamid
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral prosthesis without a stem: survivorship, early to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study from an independent centre.

Authors:  Andreas Leonidou; Siddharth Virani; Christopher Buckle; Clarence Yeoh; Jaikumar Relwani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-20

6.  Clinical implications of scapular notching at 2 and 5-year follow-up after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Shelley; Mikalyn T DeFoor; Stephen A Parada; Lynn A Crosby
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 7.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Long - Term survivorship and clinical and radiological follow - up of the primary uncemented Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Johannes H M van Ochten; Marco van der Pluijm; Martin Pouw; Quinten T M Felsch; Petra Heesterbeek; Maarten J de Vos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-24

9.  Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty - Results at a minimum of five years.

Authors:  Craig M Ball
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-03-06

10.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.