Literature DB >> 32313561

Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty - Results at a minimum of five years.

Craig M Ball1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides predictable pain relief and improvements in function, but concerns remain regarding complication rates and there is little long-term outcome data. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a minimum of five years.
METHODS: Ninety-six Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures were performed in 93 patients. There were 41 males and 52 females with an average age of 74.9 years. All available patients returned for clinical and radiographic analysis, including completion of patient reported outcome measures.
RESULTS: The complication rate was 9.4%. There were three revisions (3.1%) and two other reoperations (2.1%). Fifty-nine shoulders were available for review at an average of 81 months. Average forward flexion was 142°. Average American Shoulder and Elbow Assessment Score improved from 27.6 to 78.5 (p<0.001). Radiolucent lines and/or proximal bone resorption was seen in 35.4%. Scapula notching was observed in 69.1%, with Grade III or IV notching in 20%. These findings had no effect on patient reported outcome measures. DISCUSSION: This study confirms the clinical benefits of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with improvements maintained out to 10 years. The high rate of scapula notching remains a concern. Further study is needed to fully understand the clinical significance of notching, as well as the potential benefits of newer implant designs.
© 2019 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; patient reported outcome measures; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; scapula notching; shoulder joint replacement

Year:  2019        PMID: 32313561      PMCID: PMC7153206          DOI: 10.1177/1758573219832283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  78 in total

Review 1.  Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? a systematic review.

Authors:  J Phadnis; T Huang; A Watts; J Krishnan; G I Bain
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  How sensitive is the deltoid moment arm to humeral offset changes with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  David R Walker; Allison L Kinney; Thomas W Wright; Scott A Banks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty using the reverse prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Kelly; Jeff X Zhao; E Rhett Hobgood; Tom R Norris
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Steven Siegal; Derek Pupello; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty improves function in cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Betsy M Nolan; Elizabeth Ankerson; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how?

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Jérome Garret; Pascal Boileau; Ghassan Alami; Luc Favard; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Early follow-up of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger.

Authors:  Stephanie J Muh; Jonathan J Streit; John Paul Wanner; Christopher J Lenarz; Yousef Shishani; Douglas Y Rowland; Clay Riley; Robert J Nowinski; T Bradley Edwards; Reuben Gobezie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report.

Authors:  Derek Cuff; Rachel Clark; Derek Pupello; Mark Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Maria Körting; Patrick Khourdaji; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

3.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.