5-Hydroxymethylcytidine (hm5C) was recently identified as a direct metabolite of m5C in RNA. We investigated the stability of hm5C in human cells using bio-isotopologues and LC-MS/HRMS. This has led to the discovery of a second oxidative metabolite of m5C in RNA, namely 2'-O-methyl-5-hydroxymethylcytidine (hm5Cm). Subsequent quantitative analysis of total RNA from higher organisms revealed varying levels and TET-independent formation of this new RNA modification.
5-Hydroxymethylcytidine (hm5C) was recently identified as a direct metabolite of m5C in RNA. We investigated the stability of hm5C in human cells using bio-isotopologues and LC-MS/HRMS. This has led to the discovery of a second oxidative metabolite of m5C in RNA, namely 2'-O-methyl-5-hydroxymethylcytidine (hm5Cm). Subsequent quantitative analysis of total RNA from higher organisms revealed varying levels and TET-independent formation of this new RNA modification.
There is a wide chemical diversity
of ribonucleoside modifications in RNA.[1,2] While epigenetic
events such as DNA methylation and histone modifications are understood
to be dynamic and reversible processes, RNA modifications, have long
been considered relatively static and stable marks. However, it was
recently shown that the enzyme FTO mediates the oxidative demethylation
of m6A via N6-hydroxy- and N6-formylcytidine in mRNA.[3,4] This first example of reversible RNA methylation has opened up the
possibility that RNA modifications may also be dynamic, with potential
regulatory roles analogous to reversible epigenetic modifications.
In support of this, we recently showed that m5C undergoes
similar oxidative metabolism in RNA to produce hm5C and
that the latter modification is conserved across Archaea, Bacteria
and Eukarya.[5] Furthermore, Fu et al. reported
the ability of TET enzymes to oxidize m5C to hm5C in synthetic RNA strands in vitro and showed the dependency of
hm5C on the TET3 enzyme in an in vivo knockout mouse model.[6] Together, these studies established hm5C as a new RNA modification that is introduced through active, enzyme-catalyzed
oxidation, rather than passive, reactive oxygen species-mediated oxidation
of m5C.In contrast with m6A, which is
predominantly an mRNA
modification, we had determined by quantitative LC-MS/HRMS that hm5C is enriched in tRNA fractions (Figure S1). The turnover of m5C into hm5C is
of particular interest as the extent of m5C modification
at specific tRNA sites plays a key role in regulating the cellular
stress response. For example, the absence of m5C triggers
increased stress-induced cleavage of tRNAs and sensitizes organisms
to oxidative stress.[7,8] Furthermore, tRNA wobble modifications
can change as a result of exposure to toxic agents and thereby trigger
stress-specific enhancement of translation of proteins critical to
the cell stress response.[9,10] These response mechanisms
require a dynamic control of tRNA modifications which can either be
achieved through their reversible introduction or specific tRNA turnover/degradation.We investigated whether hm5C is indeed subject to dynamic
turnover and looked for the existence of additional, novel oxidative
metabolites of m5C to examine the presence of an active
cytidine-C5 demethylation pathway in RNA.As a means to study
the relative stabilities of m5C
and hm5C in tRNA-enriched fractions, as compared to tRNA
turnover, we selected stable isotope tracing monitored by mass spectrometry
(Figure ). We adapted
methods previously reported by us in which we studied both RNA and
DNA methylation and their oxidative pathways.[5,11,12] Briefly, humanHEK293T cells were cultured
in the presence of stable isotope labeled (SIL) methionine, 13CD3-l-methionine, to metabolically 13CD3 label the methyl group of m5C in RNA (Figure ). The medium was
then replaced with medium containing unlabeled methionine and SIL
labeled 1,3-15N2-cytidine (Figure , t = 0) and
cells were collected at hourly intervals and subjected to total RNA
isolation, over the course of 15 h, approximately a complete cell
cycle of a HEK293T cell. The total RNA fractions were each subsequently
enriched for tRNAs by fractional precipitation, enzymatically digested
into nucleosides and subjected to mass spectrometric analysis to quantify
the SIL forms of both m5C (13CD3-m5C, 15N2-m5C) and hm5C (13CD2-hm5C, 15N2-hm5C). 1,3-15N2-cytidine
was included to ensure the differential labeling of RNA synthesized
during (Figure , before t = 0) and after (Figure , from t = 0 onward) the 13CD3-l-methionine labeling. This distinguishes
the apparent 13CD decay as
a result of isotope dilution due to cell proliferation or tRNA turnover,
rather than modification turnover.
Figure 1
Overview of the stable isotope, dual-labeling
approach. Cells were
grown in the presence of [methyl-13CD3]-l-methionine until near quantitative isotope incorporation for
m5C was observed by LC-MS/HRMS. Heavy methionine (red)
was then removed and a mixture of unlabeled l-methionine
(blue) and 1,3-15N2-cytidine (green) was added.
Overview of the stable isotope, dual-labeling
approach. Cells were
grown in the presence of [methyl-13CD3]-l-methionine until near quantitative isotope incorporation for
m5C was observed by LC-MS/HRMS. Heavy methionine (red)
was then removed and a mixture of unlabeled l-methionine
(blue) and 1,3-15N2-cytidine (green) was added.Thus, we measured the abundances
of the different isotopologues
of C, m5C and hm5C in the tRNA-enriched digests
and calculated the amount of their 13CD labeled (m5C and hm5C) and unlabeled
(C) fractions relative to the sum of the total amounts of any given
modification (Figure ).
Figure 2
Amounts of the 13CD-labeled
fractions of a modification relative to the sum of the total amounts
of the same modification in small RNAs from 13CD-labeled HEK293T cells grown in the presence of 1,3-15N2-cytidine and absence of 13CD3-l-methionine as a function of time (i.e., for m5C: % 13CD3-m5C = {[13CD3-m5C]/([13CD3-m5C] + [15N2-m5C] + [m5C])} × 100).
Amounts of the 13CD-labeled
fractions of a modification relative to the sum of the total amounts
of the same modification in small RNAs from 13CD-labeled HEK293T cells grown in the presence of 1,3-15N2-cytidine and absence of 13CD3-l-methionine as a function of time (i.e., for m5C: % 13CD3-m5C = {[13CD3-m5C]/([13CD3-m5C] + [15N2-m5C] + [m5C])} × 100).We observed a 50% decrease of unlabeled cytidines (Figure , gray trace), consistent
with
the cell population and total RNA doubling in this time, which dilutes
the 15N2 label by 50% due to the addition of
1,3-15N2-cytidine at t = 0.
We observed 5-methylcytidine (Figure , red trace) had comparable stability to cytidine,
indicating the bulk of m5C residues was not subject to
active turnover. Because only a small fraction of m5C residues
is converted to hm5C (∼0.1%), this turnover was
not sufficient to detect by our approach. However, when we considered
the turnover of hm5C (Figure , blue trace), we observed a strikingly steeper
initial slope for its decay and a much lower relative abundance of
the 13CD2 isotopologue after 15 h as compared
to m5C. Consequently, hm5C-containing RNA transcripts
could either be unstable and subject to accelerated degradation, or
hm5C itself could be actively metabolized within its RNA
transcript. To explore the latter hypothesis, we screened the dual
SIL RNA samples for other oxidative derivatives of m5C.
Recently, it was shown that the Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase ALKBH1/ABH1
oxidizes m5C at position 34 in human mitochondrial tRNAMet to f5C and hm5C was not observed
as an intermediate in this study.[13] We
therefore considered the hitherto unknown 2′-OH methylated
derivative of hm5C, 2′-O-methyl-5-hydroxymethylcytidine
(hm5Cm), as a potential downstream product
of hm5C metabolism in subsequent LC-MS/HRMS analyses. 2′-O-Methylation has been observed in several RNA classes[14] and close examination of previous extracted
ion counts and fragmentation patterns of hm5C led us to
hypothesize the presence of hm5Cm in RNA.
Thus, using the tRNA-enriched digests from the 8 h time point, we
targeted the mass spectrometry for 2′-O-[13CD3-methyl]-5-[13CD2-hydroxymethyl]-cytidine,
2′-O-methyl-1,3-[15N2]-5-hydroxymethylcytidine and the minor, completely unlabeled hm5Cm isotopologues. As depicted in Figure (left), we could
extract all the corresponding product ions. This, together with the
observed coelution of all the isotopologues during liquid chromatography,
provided the first evidence for the presence of hm5Cm in RNA. The slightly earlier elution of deuteriated compounds,
as observed for 13C2D5 labeled hm5Cm (Figure , left, red trace), is commonly observed in liquid
chromatography of deuterium labeled compounds due to their different
polarity, polarizability and molecular volume compared to their lighter
isotopologues.[15]
Figure 3
(Left) Differential labeling
of hm5Cm. LC-MS/HRMS analysis of RNA obtained
from HEK293T cells grown in
regular (top), [methyl-13CD3]-l-methionine-
(middle) or 1,3-15N2-cytidine-supplemented (bottom)
medium. Extracted ion counts are shown for hm5C, 13CD2-hm5C and 15N2-hm5C. Right) Analysis of the levels of 13CD labeled modifications
after 15 h.
(Left) Differential labeling
of hm5Cm. LC-MS/HRMS analysis of RNA obtained
from HEK293T cells grown in
regular (top), [methyl-13CD3]-l-methionine-
(middle) or 1,3-15N2-cytidine-supplemented (bottom)
medium. Extracted ion counts are shown for hm5C, 13CD2-hm5C and 15N2-hm5C. Right) Analysis of the levels of 13CD labeled modifications
after 15 h.To assess the stability
of this novel RNA modification in relation
to C, m5C and hm5C we determined the levels
of 13CD-labeled modifications after 15 h, from our previous time decay
study. As shown in Figure (right), around 50% of all hm5Cm are still 13C2D5-labeled after
a complete HEK293T cell cycle. This is comparable to that observed
for rC (45%) and m5C (50%), two residues that we identified
as stable. In contrast, 13CD2-hm5C accounts for only 29% of all hm5C residues after 15
h. These data demonstrate that hm5Cm is
a stable modification. To establish unequivocally hm5Cm as a novel RNA modification, we synthesized a reference
standard for hm5Cm by sodium persulfate-mediated
oxidation of commercially obtained m5Cm[16] and performed quantitative LC-MS/HRMS
analysis of total RNA samples form a variety of organisms. Thereby,
we measured the abundance of m5C, hm5C, m5Cm and hm5Cm (Figure ). We selected HEK293T
cells and murine brain tissue as human and mammalian examples, respectively.
Furthermore, we chose models with previously reported low (Caenorhabditis elegans), high (Arabidopsis
thaliana) and undetermined (Drosophila
melanogaster) absolute levels of hm5C.[5,17] As shown in Figure , we measured hm5C levels that agreed with those previously
described by us and others.[5,6]A. thaliana RNA exhibited the highest hm5C levels (130 ppm), whereas C. elegans RNA showed the lowest (<10 ppm). Although
the presence of hm5C in D. melanogaster total RNA was previously demonstrated by dot blot experiments, we
could not verify these results by LC-MS/HRMS.[17] On the other hand, we could readily observe the 2′-OH methylated
form of hm5C, hm5Cm, in the
latter organism. This may indicate that currently used antibodies
cannot discriminate between hm5C and hm5Cm.[17] In general, organisms exhibiting
a very low or undetectable level of hm5C, actually showed
a relatively high, detectable level of the 2′-OH methylated
form, hm5Cm. In addition to D. melanogaster, this is exemplified by C. elegans, which contains 30 ppm hm5Cm in total RNA. For the human cells and mouse brain the
abundances of methylated and unmethylated hm5C are comparable.
These results suggest that oxidation of C5-methylated cytidines (m5C and/or m5Cm) is a widespread
process and eukaryotes seem to select largely for either the 2′-OH
methylated or unmetylated derivative with only mammalian RNA containing
both forms of C5-hydroxymethylation (hm5C and hm5Cm).
Figure 4
Abundance of m5C and its derivatives as determined
by
quantitative LC-MS/HRMS.
Figure 5
Abundance of hm5C and hm5Cm as determined by quantitative LC-MS/HRMS in mouse embryonic WT and
TET triple KO stem cells.
Abundance of m5C and its derivatives as determined
by
quantitative LC-MS/HRMS.Abundance of hm5C and hm5Cm as determined by quantitative LC-MS/HRMS in mouse embryonic WT and
TET triple KO stem cells.Although further studies are required to fully discern the
function
of hm5Cm, it should be noted that methylation
of 2′-hydroxyl groups in tRNA molecules has been previously
observed to occur at the first position of the anticodon to promote
codon–anticodon interaction.[18] Furthermore,
2′-O-methylation can block the ability of
the 2′-position of the nucleoside to serve as a proton donor
and therefore prevents RNA hydrolysis, increasing the lifetime of
the RNA.[19] We therefore propose that hm5Cm may promote the stability of tRNAs themselves
and the stability of duplex formation with complementary RNA molecules.
It is noteworthy that the oxidative derivative of hm5Cm, 2′-O-methyl-5-formylcytidine
is already known to be present at the wobble position of cytoplasmic
tRNAs.[20]The TET family of enzymes
was previously reported to be capable
of oxidizing m5C to hm5C in RNA both in vitro
and in vivo.[6,17] To shed light on whether hm5Cm is also TET-dependent, we measured its
levels in TET triple knockout (TKO) mouse embryonic stem cells that
have been mutated in the catalytic domain of all three TET enzymes
and therefore have no residual TET activity (Figure ).[21] Interestingly,
as we show here, hm5Cm is not TET-dependent.
RNA obtained from TET wild type and TET TKO cells show equal amounts
of the 2′-O-methylated version of hm5C. This shows that hm5Cm is generated
by an enzyme other than TET, which is in accordance with the findings
that hm5Cm is highest in organisms that
do not express TET (C. elegans) or
express TETs at a reduced level (D. melanogaster).In conclusion, we have identified a novel derivative of
C5-methylated
ribonucleosides in RNA from mammalian cells, tissue and several organisms.
The exact functional roles of hm5C and hm5Cm and the relationship between them will be the subject
of future studies.
Authors: J P Païs de Barros; G Keith; C El Adlouni; A L Glasser; G Mack; G Dirheimer; J Desgrès Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 1996-04-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Clement T Y Chan; Yan Ling Joy Pang; Wenjun Deng; I Ramesh Babu; Madhu Dyavaiah; Thomas J Begley; Peter C Dedon Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: William A Cantara; Pamela F Crain; Jef Rozenski; James A McCloskey; Kimberly A Harris; Xiaonong Zhang; Franck A P Vendeix; Daniele Fabris; Paul F Agris Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sandra Blanco; Sabine Dietmann; Joana V Flores; Shobbir Hussain; Claudia Kutter; Peter Humphreys; Margus Lukk; Patrick Lombard; Lucas Treps; Martyna Popis; Stefanie Kellner; Sabine M Hölter; Lillian Garrett; Wolfgang Wurst; Lore Becker; Thomas Klopstock; Helmut Fuchs; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Martin Hrabĕ de Angelis; Ragnhildur T Káradóttir; Mark Helm; Jernej Ule; Joseph G Gleeson; Duncan T Odom; Michaela Frye Journal: EMBO J Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Magdalena A Machnicka; Kaja Milanowska; Okan Osman Oglou; Elzbieta Purta; Malgorzata Kurkowska; Anna Olchowik; Witold Januszewski; Sebastian Kalinowski; Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz; Kristian M Rother; Mark Helm; Janusz M Bujnicki; Henri Grosjean Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Kevin A Janssen; Yixuan Xie; Marianne C Kramer; Brian D Gregory; Benjamin A Garcia Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Phillip J McCown; Agnieszka Ruszkowska; Charlotte N Kunkler; Kurtis Breger; Jacob P Hulewicz; Matthew C Wang; Noah A Springer; Jessica A Brown Journal: Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 9.349
Authors: Chongsheng He; Julianna Bozler; Kevin A Janssen; Jeremy E Wilusz; Benjamin A Garcia; Andrea J Schorn; Roberto Bonasio Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Hui Shen; Robert Jordan Ontiveros; Michael C Owens; Monica Yun Liu; Uday Ghanty; Rahul M Kohli; Kathy Fange Liu Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Isabela Cunha Navarro; Francesca Tuorto; David Jordan; Carine Legrand; Jonathan Price; Fabian Braukmann; Alan G Hendrick; Alper Akay; Annika Kotter; Mark Helm; Frank Lyko; Eric A Miska Journal: EMBO J Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 14.012