Literature DB >> 25676849

Formation and abundance of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA.

Sabrina M Huber1, Pieter van Delft, Lee Mendil, Martin Bachman, Katherine Smollett, Finn Werner, Eric A Miska, Shankar Balasubramanian.   

Abstract

RNA methylation is emerging as a regulatory RNA modification that could have important roles in the control and coordination of gene transcription and protein translation. Herein, we describe an in vivo isotope-tracing methodology to demonstrate that the ribonucleoside 5-methylcytidine (m(5)C) is subject to oxidative processing in mammals, forming 5-hydroxymethylcytidine (hm(5)C) and 5-formylcytidine (f(5)C). Furthermore, we have identified hm(5)C in total RNA from all three domains of life and in polyA-enriched RNA fractions from mammalian cells. This suggests m(5)C oxidation is a conserved process that could have critical regulatory functions inside cells.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-hydroxymethylcytosine; 5-methylcytosine; LC-MS/MS; RNA modifications; isotope tracing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25676849      PMCID: PMC4471624          DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201500013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chembiochem        ISSN: 1439-4227            Impact factor:   3.164


Half a century of research has identified more than 140 distinct post-transcriptional modifications of ribonucleic acids.[1] The majority of these chemical modifications are found in the highly abundant transfer and ribosomal RNAs (tRNA, rRNA, 95 % of total RNA) where they contribute to RNA folding, provide structural stability and diversify molecular recognition, for example, through “wobble base pairing”.[2] Recently RNA modifications have also been identified in the less abundant messenger and long noncoding RNAs (mRNA, lncRNA).[3, 4] Given the short half-life of many RNA species (t1/2<10 h), RNA modifications previously have been viewed largely as static and stable marks. Recent studies, however, have shown that they can be dynamic and might have critical regulatory and/or signalling roles inside cells, similar to the reversible epigenetic marks on DNA and histones.[5] For instance, N-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA, undergoes oxidative processing to N-hydroxymethyladenosine and N-formyladenosine by the fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and ALKBH5, respectively.[6, 7] Although the function of this dynamic adenosine methylation is not yet fully understood, it is proposed to be involved in the regulation of gene expression, mRNA stability and protein translation.[8, 9] 5-Methylcytidine (m5C) is another known methylated ribonucleoside that is widespread across both coding and noncoding RNAs from all domains of life.[2] Although 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine (m5dC) is known to be an inheritable epigenetic mark in DNA; the precise cellular and molecular functions of m5C-modified nucleobases in RNA are not clearly understood. Recent studies have shown that m5C sites in lncRNAs can affect binding to chromatin-modifying complexes in vitro;[4] this implies that RNA C5-methylation can affect the epigenetic status of a cell. Furthermore, m5C in vault RNA has been demonstrated to act as a molecular switch to produce specific small vault RNAs, which can enter the micro RNA pathway and influence the translation of distinct sets of mRNAs.[10] These findings provide the first evidence that m5C in RNA could be critical for the control and regulation of gene transcription and protein translation, and prompted us to investigate whether m5C in RNA is subject to dynamic control inside organisms in a fashion similar to m6A. Subsequent to the recent discovery of 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytosine (hm5dC) in mammalian DNA,[11] the dynamics and oxidative metabolism of DNA C5-methylation have been the subject of intense investigation. The ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of enzymes can mediate the removal of m5dC through an oxidative pathway involving the distinct intermediates hm5dC, 5-formyl-2′-deoxycytosine and 5-carboxy-2′-deoxycytosine.[12] Furthermore, studies on the lifetime of hm5dC have demonstrated that it can be a stable DNA modification, thus suggesting that hm5dC might have its own unique biological function in addition to being an intermediate in m5dC removal.[13] In RNA, hm5C was originally identified in rRNA isolated from wheat seedlings.[14] During the preparation of this manuscript, Fu et al. reported the presence of hm5C for the first time in mammalian total RNA and demonstrated that it can be formed in vitro by TET-mediated oxidation of m5C.[15] Herein, we present direct chemical evidence for the in vivo oxidative processing pathway of m5C in RNA. Using an isotope-tracing strategy in a mouse model followed by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis, we were able to follow m5C metabolism in RNA. Furthermore, we quantified hm5C in total RNA samples from all domains of life and polyA-enriched mammalian RNA to better understand the scope and biological function of this noncanonical base in RNA. To explore the in vivo metabolic pathway of 5-methylcytosine in RNA and determine whether hm5C is indeed the result of m5C oxidation, we carried out an isotope-tracing experiment by using a mouse model. RNA methyltransferases (RMTases) use S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as the methyl-group donor in all nucleoside methylation events.[2] As SAM is synthesized from l-methionine,[16] feeding mice on a diet supplemented with 13C and D stable-isotope-labelled methionine leads to the incorporation of these isotopes into the C5-methyl group of m5C. Consequently, isolation of the murine RNA and the LC-MS/MS analysis thereof, enables the detection of isotope-labelled m5C and any derivatives that are formed directly from it. Mice were fed on a custom diet depleted of l-methionine and supplemented with l-[methyl-13CD3]methionine for 117 days.[13] The mice were then sacrificed, and RNA was extracted from their brain tissue, which was then digested by a mixture of nucleases and phosphatases to form the nucleoside monomers. Incorporation of the 13CD3 label was then assessed by LC-MS/MS analysis of the RNA nucleosides, with the mass filters of the triple quadrupole preset for m5C and m5C+4 Da. This revealed that the 13CD3 label had been incorporated in 51 % of total m5C (Scheme 1). Next, we detected the masses of hm5C and f5C and their expected isotopologues hm5C+3 Da and f5C+2 Da, respectively. As depicted in Scheme1, we observed 13C and D isotope incorporation into hm5C and f5C with similar efficiencies as for m5C (hm5C: 41 %, f5C: 39 %). These findings confirm that m5C in RNA can be oxidatively metabolized first to hm5C and subsequently to f5C. In the recently published study on TET-mediated oxidation of m5C to hm5C in synthetic RNA oligonucleotides, no significant sequential in vitro oxidation of hm5C to f5C was observed.[15] In vivo methylation and subsequent oxidation of cytidine as detected by MS analysis of RNA from the brain of mice fed with l-[methyl-13CD3]methionine. Numbers correspond to the ratio of peak areas of the depicted labelled nucleosides (in grey) against the respective unlabelled nucleosides (in brackets). See Figure S6.1 and Table S6.3 for extracted ion count chromatograms and absolute values obtained thereof, and Table S6.4 for HR-LC-MS/MS data. The conservation of m5C in RNA across Archaea, bacteria and eukaryotes[2] and the apparent metabolic relationship between m5C and hm5C in vivo suggest that RNA C5-hydroxymethylation could be a widespread process. To asses the prevalence of hm5C across different species, a quantitative LC-MS/MS method was implemented with stable isotope-labelled (SIL) internal standards, which were spiked into samples and calibration standards.[17] Its presence and concentrations were determined by using both the LC and MS/MS selectivity. To apply this method to the detection and quantification of m5C and hm5C in RNA, SIL standards for cytidine, m5C and hm5C were synthesised as depicted in Scheme 2.[18] Thus, 2-13C,15N2-labelled uracil was synthesized from a commercial source of [2-13C,15N2]urea and used in a Vorbrüggen coupling with an acyl-protected ribose donor in the presence of a Lewis acid to yield 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-benzoyl-[2-13C,1,3-15N2]uridine (2; Scheme 2 A). Treatment of 2 with tri-(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)-N-phosphoramidate furnished an intermediate N4-triazolyl species. Subsequent aminolysis with concentrated aqueous NH4OH and saponification of the benzoyl esters under Zemplén conditions yielded [2-13C,1,3-15N2]cytidine (3). 5-Hydroxymethyl-[2-13C,1,3-15N2]cytidine (4) was obtained from hydroxymethylation of 3 by adapting published procedures in a microwave-assisted formylation reaction in combination with the use of a cyclic acetal protecting group to aid purification.[19] 5-[Methyl-D3]-[6D]cytidine (6) was synthesized from [D4]thymine by using the same sequence of reactions as was used for the synthesis of 3 (Scheme 2 B). Synthesis of stable-isotope-labelled cytidine, 5-methylcytidine and 5-hydroxymethylcytidine: a) polyphosphoric acid, 17 h, 95 °C, 37 %; b) TMSCl, 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane, MeCN, 14 h, 85 °C; c) 1-O-acetyl-2,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-ribofuranose, TMSOTf, 1,2-dichloroethene, 4 h, 70 °C, 80 %; d) tris(3,5-dihydro-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)phosphine oxide, MeCN, 17 h, 25 °C; e) NH4OH (35 %), 1,4-dioxane, 2 h, 25 °C, 69 %; f) NaOMe, MeOH, 5 h, 25 °C, 97 %; g) H2SO4, acetone, 15 h, 25 °C, 87 %; h) paraformaldehyde, KOH (0.5 M), microwave irradiation, 75 min, 60 °C, 16 %; i) 90 % TFA, 1 h, 0 °C, 98 %. Asterisks represent a 15N or 13C isotopologue.[18] With the stable-isotope-labelled internal standards in hand, we examined the abundance of hm5C in total RNA samples from model organisms representing the three domains of life by using a previously described methodology.[20] We chose the archaeal species Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, the bacterium Escherichia coli and two eukaryotic model organisms, namely a plant (Arabidopsis thaliana) and a nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans). HEK293T cells and mammalian tissues[21] were analysed to verify previously reported results.[15] To rule out oxidation of m5C to hm5C as a result of downstream RNA processing, we subjected synthetic RNA 122-mers to identical RNA extraction and enzymatic digestion. No oxidation was detected in the quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of these control samples. We detected hm5C in all samples studied (Figure 1), thus confirming RNA C5-hydroxymethylation as a common RNA modification. Notably, hm5C was found in species that do not exhibit detectable hm5dC in their DNA and lack TET homologues in their genomes, such as C. elegans and A. thaliana.[22] This suggests that, in such organisms, the formation of hm5C in RNA must occur through a non-TET mechanism. As noted by Fu et al., their observation that TET-null ES cells in which TET1, TET2, and TET3 are genetically deleted still exhibit significant hm5C levels in RNA also supports the idea that hm5C in RNA can form from pathways that do not involve TET enzymes.[15] Comparison of m5C oxidation into hm5C across the different species revealed varying levels (Figure 2). This could also indicate that RNA hydroxymethylation is the result of different enzymatic transformations. It will ultimately be essential to map the position of hm5C to specific RNAs in order to understand its function. As a step towards elucidating hm5C location, we explored the abundance of hm5C in RNA classes other than tRNA and rRNA. Specifically, we isolated mRNA and lncRNAs from HEK293T cells that contain a polyA tail by RNA pulldown using polyT magnetic beads. Subsequent analysis of this fraction by LC-MS/MS allowed us to measure hm5C (Figure S6.2 in the Supporting Information). In these samples, the extent of C5-hydroxymethylation in polyA RNA was 40 times higher than in total RNA (Table S6.5). Currently, the function of m5C in mRNA and lncRNA is not clearly understood. However, the presence and levels of hm5C as an oxidative m5C metabolite in polyA RNA suggests that hm5C and m5C might be part of a dynamic regulatory mechanism. Further studies are needed to assess the functional roles of m5C and hm5C in RNA.
Figure 1

Levels of m5C and hm5C across different model organisms given in amounts relative to the sum of (modified) cytosine residues.[20]

Figure 2

The abundance of hm5C as a fraction of m5C in various organisms.

Levels of m5C and hm5C across different model organisms given in amounts relative to the sum of (modified) cytosine residues.[20] The abundance of hm5C as a fraction of m5C in various organisms. In summary, we have shown for the first time that 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA is generated by m5C oxidation in vivo and is pervasive in all three domains of life across a variety of different species. Our findings suggest the existence of dynamic m5C metabolism in RNA that might have important roles in RNA function.

Experimental Section

All in vivo experiments were performed under the terms of a UK Home Office licence. C57BL/6J (JAX mice strain) mice were bred and housed according to UK Home Office guidelines. Detailed information on the mouse labelling study, cell culture and subsequent RNA extraction (TRI reagent, Sigma) and purification (RNA clean & concentrator kit, Zymo Research) is given in the Supporting Information. Synthetic procedures and full compound characterization for all compounds and 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 3, 4 and 6 can also be found in the Supporting Information. RNA was digested by using a mixture of Benzonase (Sigma), snake venom phosphodiesterase I (Crotalus adamanteus venom, Sigma) and antarctic phosphatase (New England Biolabs) in a Tris⋅HCl buffer (pH 8) for 12 h. A solution of SIL C, m5C and hm5C used for LC-MS/MS quantitation was added to samples before the enzymatic digestion. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed by using an Agilent 1290 Infinity UHPLC system coupled to an AB Sciex 6500 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Chromatographic conditions typically consisted of using a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column and an H2O/MeCN (0.1 % formic acid) linear gradient.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Stable-isotope dilution LC–MS for quantitative biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Eugene Ciccimaro; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Effect of light on the nucleotide composition of rRNA of wheat seedlings.

Authors:  I Rácz; I Király; D Lásztily
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Cellular dynamics of RNA modification.

Authors:  Chengqi Yi; Tao Pan
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 4.  S-Adenosylmethionine.

Authors:  S C Lu
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.085

5.  ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility.

Authors:  Guanqun Zheng; John Arne Dahl; Yamei Niu; Peter Fedorcsak; Chun-Min Huang; Charles J Li; Cathrine B Vågbø; Yue Shi; Wen-Ling Wang; Shu-Hui Song; Zhike Lu; Ralph P G Bosmans; Qing Dai; Ya-Juan Hao; Xin Yang; Wen-Ming Zhao; Wei-Min Tong; Xiu-Jie Wang; Florian Bogdan; Kari Furu; Ye Fu; Guifang Jia; Xu Zhao; Jun Liu; Hans E Krokan; Arne Klungland; Yun-Gui Yang; Chuan He
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO.

Authors:  Guifang Jia; Ye Fu; Xu Zhao; Qing Dai; Guanqun Zheng; Ying Yang; Chengqi Yi; Tomas Lindahl; Tao Pan; Yun-Gui Yang; Chuan He
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 7.  5-methylcytosine in RNA: detection, enzymatic formation and biological functions.

Authors:  Yuri Motorin; Frank Lyko; Mark Helm
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  NSun2-mediated cytosine-5 methylation of vault noncoding RNA determines its processing into regulatory small RNAs.

Authors:  Shobbir Hussain; Abdulrahim A Sajini; Sandra Blanco; Sabine Dietmann; Patrick Lombard; Yoichiro Sugimoto; Maike Paramor; Joseph G Gleeson; Duncan T Odom; Jernej Ule; Michaela Frye
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Zhike Lu; Adrian Gomez; Gary C Hon; Yanan Yue; Dali Han; Ye Fu; Marc Parisien; Qing Dai; Guifang Jia; Bing Ren; Tao Pan; Chuan He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Long non-coding RNAs as targets for cytosine methylation.

Authors:  Thomas Amort; Marie F Soulière; Alexandra Wille; Xi-Yu Jia; Heidi Fiegl; Hildegard Wörle; Ronald Micura; Alexandra Lusser
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.652

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Chemical and structural effects of base modifications in messenger RNA.

Authors:  Emily M Harcourt; Anna M Kietrys; Eric T Kool
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  mRNA Editing, Processing and Quality Control in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Joshua A Arribere; Hidehito Kuroyanagi; Heather A Hundley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  A molecular-level perspective on the frequency, distribution, and consequences of messenger RNA modifications.

Authors:  Joshua D Jones; Jeremy Monroe; Kristin S Koutmou
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 4.  The roles of TET family proteins in development and stem cells.

Authors:  Jihong Yang; Nazym Bashkenova; Ruge Zang; Xin Huang; Jianlong Wang
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  The epitranscriptome beyond m6A.

Authors:  David Wiener; Schraga Schwartz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  YTHDF2 Binds to 5-Methylcytosine in RNA and Modulates the Maturation of Ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Dai; Gwendolyn Gonzalez; Lin Li; Jie Li; Changjun You; Weili Miao; Junchi Hu; Lijuan Fu; Yonghui Zhao; Ruidong Li; Lichao Li; Xuemei Chen; Yanhui Xu; Weifeng Gu; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Epitranscriptome sequencing technologies: decoding RNA modifications.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Li; Xushen Xiong; Chengqi Yi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 8.  Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications.

Authors:  Boxuan Simen Zhao; Ian A Roundtree; Chuan He
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Unraveling the RNA modification code with mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Richard Lauman; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Mol Omics       Date:  2020-04-14

Review 10.  Role of RNA modifications in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Y Jung; D Goldman
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.