Literature DB >> 32036562

Polarity- and Intensity-Independent Modulation of Timing During Delay Eyeblink Conditioning Using Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Jessica Mitroi1, Leah P Burroughs1, Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks1,2, Amanda R Bolbecker1,3, Nancy B Lundin1,2, Brian F O'Donnell1,2,3, William P Hetrick4,5,6.   

Abstract

Delay eyeblink conditioning (dEBC) is widely used to assess cerebellar-dependent associative motor learning, including precise timing processes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), noninvasive brain stimulation used to indirectly excite and inhibit select brain regions, may be a promising tool for understanding how functional integrity of the cerebellum influences dEBC behavior. The aim of this study was to assess whether tDCS-induced inhibition (cathodal) and excitation (anodal) of the cerebellum differentially impact timing of dEBC. A standard 10-block dEBC paradigm was administered to 102 healthy participants. Participants were randomized to stimulation conditions in a double-blind, between-subjects sham-controlled design. Participants received 20-min active (anodal or cathodal) stimulation at 1.5 mA (n = 20 anodal, n = 22 cathodal) or 2 mA (n = 19 anodal, n = 21 cathodal) or sham stimulation (n = 20) concurrently with dEBC training. Stimulation intensity and polarity effects on percent conditioned responses (CRs) and CR peak and onset latency were examined using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Acquisition of CRs increased over time at a similar rate across sham and all active stimulation groups. CR peak and onset latencies were later, i.e., closer to air puff onset, in all active stimulation groups compared to the sham group. Thus, tDCS facilitated cerebellar-dependent timing of dEBC, irrespective of stimulation intensity and polarity. These findings highlight the feasibility of using tDCS to modify cerebellar-dependent functions and provide further support for cerebellar contributions to human eyeblink conditioning and for exploring therapeutic tDCS interventions for cerebellar dysfunction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative learning; Cerebellum; Eyeblink conditioning; Intensity; Polarity; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32036562      PMCID: PMC7202963          DOI: 10.1007/s12311-020-01114-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  47 in total

Review 1.  Brain substrates of classical eyeblink conditioning: a highly localized but also distributed system.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Michael A Nitsche; Nadia Bolognini; Marom Bikson; Tim Wagner; Lotfi Merabet; Dylan J Edwards; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Eyeblink conditioning deficits indicate timing and cerebellar abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  S M Brown; P D Kieffaber; C A Carroll; J L Vohs; J A Tracy; A Shekhar; B F O'Donnell; J E Steinmetz; W P Hetrick
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Eyeblink conditioning anomalies in bipolar disorder suggest cerebellar dysfunction.

Authors:  Amanda R Bolbecker; Crystal Mehta; Jason K Johannesen; Chad R Edwards; Brian F O'Donnell; Anantha Shekhar; John I Nurnberger; Joseph E Steinmetz; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 5.  The Cerebellum: Adaptive Prediction for Movement and Cognition.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; R Chris Miall; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Cannabis use disrupts eyeblink conditioning: evidence for cannabinoid modulation of cerebellar-dependent learning.

Authors:  Patrick D Skosnik; Chad R Edwards; Brian F O'Donnell; Ashley Steffen; Joseph E Steinmetz; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Functional anatomy of human eyeblink conditioning determined with regional cerebral glucose metabolism and positron-emission tomography.

Authors:  C G Logan; S T Grafton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation-ROAST-a fully automated open-source pipeline.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Cerebellar Lobules Optimal Stimulation (CLOS): A Computational Pipeline to Optimize Cerebellar Lobule-Specific Electric Field Distribution.

Authors:  Zeynab Rezaee; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Autism and Classical Eyeblink Conditioning: Performance Changes of the Conditioned Response Related to Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis.

Authors:  John P Welsh; Jeffrey T Oristaglio
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.157

View more
  4 in total

1.  Long-term effects of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyeblink responses.

Authors:  Otilia Kimpel; Thomas Hulst; Giorgi Batsikadze; Thomas M Ernst; Michael A Nitsche; Dagmar Timmann; Marcus Gerwig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of cerebellum alters spiking precision in cerebellar cortex: A modeling study of cellular responses.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Roeland Hancock; Sabato Santaniello
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ohad Lerner; Jason Friedman; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Cerebellar tDCS consistency and metabolite changes: A recommendation to decrease barriers to replicability.

Authors:  Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks; Leah P Burroughs; Abinand C Rejimon; Hu Cheng; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 8.955

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.