Deborah L Helitzer1,2, Sharon L Newbill2, Gina Cardinali2, Page S Morahan3,4,5, Shine Chang6, Diane Magrane7. 1. 1 College of Population Health, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, New Mexico. 2. 2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, New Mexico. 3. 3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. 4 Program for Women®, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. 5 Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER®) Institute , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 6. 6 Cancer Prevention Research Training Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas. 7. 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Center for Executive Leadership in Academics (ICELA at Drexel®), Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: By 2006, women constituted 34% of academic medical faculty, reaching a critical mass. Theoretically, with critical mass, culture and policy supportive of gender equity should be evident. We explore whether having a critical mass of women transforms institutional culture and organizational change. METHODS: Career development program participants were interviewed to elucidate their experiences in academic health centers (AHCs). Focus group discussions were held with institutional leaders to explore their perceptions about contemporary challenges related to gender and leadership. Content analysis of both data sources revealed points of convergence. Findings were interpreted using the theory of critical mass. RESULTS: Two nested domains emerged: the individual domain included the rewards and personal satisfaction of meaningful work, personal agency, tensions between cultural expectations of family and academic roles, and women's efforts to work for gender equity. The institutional domain depicted the sociocultural environment of AHCs that shaped women's experience, both personally and professionally, lack of institutional strategies to engage women in organizational initiatives, and the influence of one leader on women's ascent to leadership. CONCLUSIONS: The predominant evidence from this research demonstrates that the institutional barriers and sociocultural environment continue to be formidable obstacles confronting women, stalling the transformational effects expected from achieving a critical mass of women faculty. We conclude that the promise of critical mass as a turning point for women should be abandoned in favor of "critical actor" leaders, both women and men, who individually and collectively have the commitment and power to create gender-equitable cultures in AHCs.
PURPOSE: By 2006, women constituted 34% of academic medical faculty, reaching a critical mass. Theoretically, with critical mass, culture and policy supportive of gender equity should be evident. We explore whether having a critical mass of women transforms institutional culture and organizational change. METHODS: Career development program participants were interviewed to elucidate their experiences in academic health centers (AHCs). Focus group discussions were held with institutional leaders to explore their perceptions about contemporary challenges related to gender and leadership. Content analysis of both data sources revealed points of convergence. Findings were interpreted using the theory of critical mass. RESULTS: Two nested domains emerged: the individual domain included the rewards and personal satisfaction of meaningful work, personal agency, tensions between cultural expectations of family and academic roles, and women's efforts to work for gender equity. The institutional domain depicted the sociocultural environment of AHCs that shaped women's experience, both personally and professionally, lack of institutional strategies to engage women in organizational initiatives, and the influence of one leader on women's ascent to leadership. CONCLUSIONS: The predominant evidence from this research demonstrates that the institutional barriers and sociocultural environment continue to be formidable obstacles confronting women, stalling the transformational effects expected from achieving a critical mass of women faculty. We conclude that the promise of critical mass as a turning point for women should be abandoned in favor of "critical actor" leaders, both women and men, who individually and collectively have the commitment and power to create gender-equitable cultures in AHCs.
Entities:
Keywords:
academic medicine; qualitative research; women faculty
Authors: William F Rayburn; Ronald M Schrader; Joanna M Cain; Raul Artal; Garland D Anderson; Irwin R Merkatz Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Alyssa Friede Westring; Rebecca M Speck; Mary Dupuis Sammel; Patricia Scott; Emily F Conant; Lucy Wolf Tuton; Stephanie B Abbuhl; Jeane Ann Grisso Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Molly B Kraus; Bhargavi Gali; Grace W Cunningham; Susan M Moeschler; Phillip J Schulte; Madeline Q Johnson; Emily E Sharpe Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: Suzanne C Danhauer; Janet A Tooze; Natalie Am Barrett; Jamie S Blalock; Carol A Shively; Mary Lou Voytko; Sonia J Crandall Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2019-07-16
Authors: Courtney E Harris; Stephanie D Clark; Sherry S Chesak; Tejinder K Khalsa; Manisha Salinas; Amy C S Pearson; Amy W Williams; Susan M Moeschler; Anjali Bhagra Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-04-30