Literature DB >> 23168768

Women in leadership positions within obstetrics and gynecology: does the past explain the present?

Laura Baecher-Lind1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the proportion of leadership positions in obstetrics and gynecology held by women is consistent with expectations based on the proportion of women entering residency at the time of current leaders.
METHODS: Leadership positions were considered as department chairs affiliated with the Council of University Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology, editors of the 20 obstetrics and gynecology journals with the highest impact factors [corrected],and presidents of influential professional societies. Publically available data were accessed to determine sex and the year of medical school graduation for each individual holding each leadership position, as well as to determine the number of men and women entering residency in obstetrics and gynecology per year. Actual and expected proportions of leadership positions held by women were compared using χ² tests.
RESULTS: Women should hold 71 of the total 194 leadership positions based on the proportion of women entering residency during the mean graduation year among leaders. Women actually hold 41 of these leadership positions (21.1%; P<.001). Considering only leaders who graduated during the years in which residency matching data were available, women should hold 28 of these 74 leadership positions. Women actually hold 20 of the leadership positions from this subset (27.0%; P=.05).
CONCLUSION: Women are underrepresented in leadership positions in obstetrics and gynecology, and this cannot be explained by historical sex imbalances among physicians entering our specialty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168768     DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318275679d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Critical Mass or Critical Actors?

Authors:  Deborah L Helitzer; Sharon L Newbill; Gina Cardinali; Page S Morahan; Shine Chang; Diane Magrane
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Gender inequality in leadership and academic rank in academic reproductive endocrinology programs.

Authors:  Jessica H Selter; Emily E Spurlin; Paula C Brady
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Gender inequalities on editorial boards of indexed pediatrics journals.

Authors:  Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo; Javier González de Dios; Joan Aleixandre-Agulló; Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Leadership aspirations among residents in obstetrics and gynecology in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Brindha Bavan; Jordan Chavez; Briana Saravanabavanandhan; Jie Li; Shannon MacLaughlan David
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Gender Disparity in Leadership Positions of General Surgical Societies in North America, Europe, and Oceania.

Authors:  Bicong Wu; Nizar Bhulani; Sabeena Jalal; Jeffrey Ding; Faisal Khosa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-03

6.  Gender Associated with the Intention to Choose a Medical Specialty in Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in 11 Countries in Latin America.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Ng-Sueng; Iván Vargas-Matos; Percy Mayta-Tristán; Reneé Pereyra-Elías; Juan José Montenegro-Idrogo; Fiorella Inga-Berrospi; Felix Ancalli; Francisco Bonilla-Escobar; Cristian Diaz-Velez; Erick Gutierrez-Quezada; Jennifer Gomez-Alhach; Carlos E Muñoz-Medina; Adriana Sanchez-Pozo; Milisen Vidal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Women's leadership in academic medicine: a systematic review of extent, condition and interventions.

Authors:  Lulu Alwazzan; Samiah S Al-Angari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.