Literature DB >> 2808921

An addendum to "Effects of Noise on Speech Production: Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928 (1988)].

W V Summers1, K Johnson, D B Pisoni, R H Bernacki.   

Abstract

The authors respond to Fitch's comments [H. Fitch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 2017-2019 (1989)] on an earlier paper. New analyses are presented to address the question of whether F1 differences observed in the original report are an artifact of linear predictive coding (LPC) analysis techniques. Contrary to Fitch's claims, the results suggest that the F1 differences originally reported are, in fact, due to changes in vocal tract resonance characteristics. It is concluded that there are important acoustic-phonetic differences in speech when talkers speak in noise. These differences reflect changes in both glottal and supraglottal events that are designed to maintain speech intelligibility under adverse conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808921      PMCID: PMC3521161          DOI: 10.1121/1.398602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Comments on "Effects of Noise on Speech Production: Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928 (1988)].

Authors:  H Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-12

4.  Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency.

Authors:  A W Slawson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics.

Authors:  H Lane; B Tranel; C Sisson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perception of front vowels: the role of harmonics in the first formant region.

Authors:  P F Assmann; T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra.

Authors:  L A Chistovich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels.

Authors:  H Traunmüller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.840

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Impaired Feedforward Control and Enhanced Feedback Control of Speech in Patients with Cerebellar Degeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Zarinah Agnew; Srikantan Nagarajan; John Houde; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.