Literature DB >> 7240581

Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels.

H Traunmüller.   

Abstract

The role of intrinsic factors determining perceived degree of vowel openness was examined. In order to determine the role of F1 and F0, one-formant vowels, covering a wide range of fundamental and formant frequencies, were identified by 23 subjects who were native speakers of a Bavarian dialect in which five degrees of openness occur distinctively. The significance of intrinsic factors other than F1 and F0 was also studied using synthetic versions of natural vowels with F1 and/or F0 systematically displaced in frequency. It was found that, generally, the tonality distance between F1 and F0 is decisive for openness, while the higher formants contribute marginally. It was further found that the distance between widely spaced formants, as between F2 and F1 in front vowels, is not crucial for vowel identification. The results are evaluated in terms of a psychoacoustic model of identification by pattern matching. the model incorporates two basic assumptions. First, a certain pattern of excitation along the basilar membrane is recognized as a given feature regardless of position along the membrane. Second, there is an integration band with a width of 3 Bark effective in spectrum envelope recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7240581     DOI: 10.1121/1.385780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  The missing fundamental in vowel height perception.

Authors:  R P Fahey; R L Diehl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

2.  An addendum to "Effects of Noise on Speech Production: Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928 (1988)].

Authors:  W V Summers; K Johnson; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Higher formant normalization results from auditory integration of F2 and F3.

Authors:  K Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

4.  Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Kevin G Munhall; David W Purcell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relative Weights of Temporal Envelope Cues in Different Frequency Regions for Mandarin Vowel, Consonant, and Lexical Tone Recognition.

Authors:  Zhong Zheng; Keyi Li; Gang Feng; Yang Guo; Yinan Li; Lili Xiao; Chengqi Liu; Shouhuan He; Zhen Zhang; Di Qian; Yanmei Feng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Variability in English vowels is comparable in articulation and acoustics.

Authors:  Aude Noiray; Khalil Iskarous; D H Whalen
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2014-05-01

7.  A dual mechanism for intrinsic f0.

Authors:  Wei-Rong Chen; D H Whalen; Mark K Tiede
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Indexical and linguistic processing by 12-month-olds: Discrimination of speaker, accent and vowel differences.

Authors:  Karen E Mulak; Cory D Bonn; Kateřina Chládková; Richard N Aslin; Paola Escudero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intelligibility of speech produced by sighted and blind adults.

Authors:  Lucie Ménard; Pamela Trudeau-Fisette; Mark Kenneth Tiede
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.