Literature DB >> 28842410

Impaired Feedforward Control and Enhanced Feedback Control of Speech in Patients with Cerebellar Degeneration.

Benjamin Parrell1,2, Zarinah Agnew3, Srikantan Nagarajan4, John Houde3, Richard B Ivry2.   

Abstract

The cerebellum has been hypothesized to form a crucial part of the speech motor control network. Evidence for this comes from patients with cerebellar damage, who exhibit a variety of speech deficits, as well as imaging studies showing cerebellar activation during speech production in healthy individuals. To date, the precise role of the cerebellum in speech motor control remains unclear, as it has been implicated in both anticipatory (feedforward) and reactive (feedback) control. Here, we assess both anticipatory and reactive aspects of speech motor control, comparing the performance of patients with cerebellar degeneration and matched controls. Experiment 1 tested feedforward control by examining speech adaptation across trials in response to a consistent perturbation of auditory feedback. Experiment 2 tested feedback control, examining online corrections in response to inconsistent perturbations of auditory feedback. Both male and female patients and controls were tested. The patients were impaired in adapting their feedforward control system relative to controls, exhibiting an attenuated anticipatory response to the perturbation. In contrast, the patients produced even larger compensatory responses than controls, suggesting an increased reliance on sensory feedback to guide speech articulation in this population. Together, these results suggest that the cerebellum is crucial for maintaining accurate feedforward control of speech, but relatively uninvolved in feedback control.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Speech motor control is a complex activity that is thought to rely on both predictive, feedforward control as well as reactive, feedback control. While the cerebellum has been shown to be part of the speech motor control network, its functional contribution to feedback and feedforward control remains controversial. Here, we use real-time auditory perturbations of speech to show that patients with cerebellar degeneration are impaired in adapting feedforward control of speech but retain the ability to make online feedback corrections; indeed, the patients show an increased sensitivity to feedback. These results indicate that the cerebellum forms a crucial part of the feedforward control system for speech but is not essential for online, feedback control.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/379249-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ataxic dysarthria; cerebellum; feedback control; feedforward control; speech; speech motor control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28842410      PMCID: PMC5607467          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3363-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  44 in total

1.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The role of strategies in motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  A neuroimaging study of premotor lateralization and cerebellar involvement in the production of phonemes and syllables.

Authors:  Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  33 in total

1.  Cerebellar contribution to auditory feedback control of speech production: Evidence from patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Jiajun Zhuang; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Zhiqin Xu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Abnormally increased vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  John F Houde; Jeevit S Gill; Zarinah Agnew; Hardik Kothare; Gregory Hickok; Benjamin Parrell; Richard B Ivry; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Articulating: The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Production.

Authors:  Elaine Kearney; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Thalamostriatal and cerebellothalamic pathways in a songbird, the Bengalese finch.

Authors:  David A Nicholson; Todd F Roberts; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Neural bases of sensorimotor adaptation in the vocal motor system.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Stacey Sangtian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Did We Get Sensorimotor Adaptation Wrong? Implicit Adaptation as Direct Policy Updating Rather than Forward-Model-Based Learning.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Temporal Coordination and Prosodic Structure in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Timing Across Speech and Non-speech Motor Domains.

Authors:  Kathryn Franich; Hung Yat Wong; Alan C L Yu; Carol K S To
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-10-24

10.  Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Sara-Ching Chao; Lacee C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.