Literature DB >> 28087414

Consumption of Low-Calorie Sweeteners among Children and Adults in the United States.

Allison C Sylvetsky, Yichen Jin, Elena J Clark, Jean A Welsh, Kristina I Rother, Sameera A Talegawkar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consumption of low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) has increased markedly during the past several decades, yet the prevalence of LCS consumption in recent years is currently unknown.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe LCS consumption in the United States and to characterize consumption by sociodemographic subgroups, source, frequency, eating occasion, and location.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2009 to 2012. The prevalence of LCS consumption was assessed using two 24-hour dietary recalls, while the frequency (number of times per day), occasion (meal vs snack vs alone), and location of LCS consumption (at home vs away from home) was assessed using data from the one, in-person, 24-hour dietary recall. PARTICIPANTS: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants (2 years old or older) either in 2009-2010 (n=9,047) or in 2011-2012 (n=7,939). After excluding participants with implausible energy intake (n=44), the final sample size was 16,942. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals consuming one or more foods, beverages, or packets containing LCSs during at least one of their two dietary recalls. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Data were weighted to provide national estimates and Stata frequency procedures for complex survey design were used for all analyses.
RESULTS: Our findings were that 25.1% of children and 41.4% adults reported consuming LCSs. Most LCS consumers reported use once daily (80% of children, 56% of adults) and frequency of consumption increased with body weight in adults. LCS consumption was higher in females compared with males among adults, and in obese individuals, compared with overweight and normal-weight individuals. Individuals of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity also had higher prevalence of consumption compared with non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics and those in the highest tertile of income had higher LCS consumption compared with individuals of middle or low income across LCS product categories in adults, and for LCS beverages and LCS foods in children. Most LCS consumers reported consuming LCS with meals (64% of adults, 62% of children) and the majority of LCS consumption occurred at home (71% and 72% among adults and children, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: LCS consumption is highly prevalent in the United States, among both children and adults. Well-controlled, prospective trials are required to understand the health impact of this widespread LCS exposure. Copyright Â
© 2017 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial sweeteners; Beverages; Diabetes; Diet soda; Obesity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28087414      PMCID: PMC6176710          DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  28 in total

Review 1.  Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.

Authors:  Len Ritter; Keith Solomon; Paul Sibley; Ken Hall; Patricia Keen; Gevan Mattu; Beth Linton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2002-01-11

2.  Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners.

Authors:  Cindy Fitch; Kathryn S Keim
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.910

3.  Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 4.  Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-19

Review 5.  Non-nutritive sweeteners and their role in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Rebecca J Brown; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Trends in purchases and intake of foods and beverages containing caloric and low-calorie sweeteners over the last decade in the United States.

Authors:  C Piernas; S W Ng; B Popkin
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Fueling the obesity epidemic? Artificially sweetened beverage use and long-term weight gain.

Authors:  Sharon P Fowler; Ken Williams; Roy G Resendez; Kelly J Hunt; Helen P Hazuda; Michael P Stern
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Use of caloric and noncaloric sweeteners in US consumer packaged foods, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Shu Wen Ng; Meghan M Slining; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  Associations between Meal and Snack Frequency and Diet Quality in US Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2012.

Authors:  Kentaro Murakami; M Barbara E Livingstone
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.910

10.  What Parents Think about Giving Nonnutritive Sweeteners to Their Children: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Mitchell Greenberg; Xiongce Zhao; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-04
View more
  58 in total

1.  Older US adults like sweetened colas, but not other chemesthetic beverages.

Authors:  Madison R Wierenga; Ciera R Crawford; Cordelia A Running
Journal:  J Texture Stud       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Obesity: Sweetener associated with increased adiposity in young adults.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Jane Shearer
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Restless legs syndrome associated with use of stevia nonnutritive sweetener.

Authors:  Umesh Goswami; Snigdha Pusalavidyasagar
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Response to "The importance of study design in the assessment of nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health".

Authors:  Meghan B Azad; Dylan S MacKay; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Widespread sucralose exposure in a randomized clinical trial in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Peter J Walter; H Martin Garraffo; Kim Robien; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Pharmacokinetics of Sucralose and Acesulfame-Potassium in Breast Milk Following Ingestion of Diet Soda.

Authors:  Kristina I Rother; Allison C Sylvetsky; Peter J Walter; H Martin Garraffo; David A Fields
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  Sweeteners are added to modify consumer behaviour.

Authors:  Sven E Jordt; Sairam Jabba
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-25

9.  Prevalence of low-calorie sweetener intake in South Asian adults.

Authors:  Yichen Jin; Allison C Sylvetsky; Namratha R Kandula; Alka M Kanaya; Sameera A Talegawkar
Journal:  Nutr Health       Date:  2018-08-13

10.  High-dose saccharin supplementation does not induce gut microbiota changes or glucose intolerance in healthy humans and mice.

Authors:  Joan Serrano; Kathleen R Smith; Audra L Crouch; Vandana Sharma; Fanchao Yi; Veronika Vargova; Traci E LaMoia; Lydia M Dupont; Vanida Serna; Fenfen Tang; Laisa Gomes-Dias; Joshua J Blakeslee; Emmanuel Hatzakis; Scott N Peterson; Matthew Anderson; Richard E Pratley; George A Kyriazis
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.