Yoona Kim1, Jennifer B Keogh2, Peter M Clifton3. 1. Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Natural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea. 2. Division of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 3. Division of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. peter.clifton@unisa.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The consumption of foods and beverages containing non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) has increased worldwide over the last three decades. Consumers' choice of NNS rather than sugar or other nutritive sweeteners may be attributable to their potential to reduce weight gain. RECENT FINDINGS: It is not clear what the effects of NNS consumption are on glycaemic control and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. This review aims to examine this question in epidemiological, human intervention and animal studies. It is not clear that NNS consumption has an effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes or on glycaemic control even though there is some evidence for the modification of the microbiome and for interaction with sweet taste receptors in the oral cavity and the intestines' modification of secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY), ghrelin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), which may affect glycaemia following consumption of NNS. In conclusion, long-term studies of NNS consumption are required to draw a firm conclusion about the role of NNS consumption on glycaemic control.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The consumption of foods and beverages containing non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) has increased worldwide over the last three decades. Consumers' choice of NNS rather than sugar or other nutritive sweeteners may be attributable to their potential to reduce weight gain. RECENT FINDINGS: It is not clear what the effects of NNS consumption are on glycaemic control and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. This review aims to examine this question in epidemiological, human intervention and animal studies. It is not clear that NNS consumption has an effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes or on glycaemic control even though there is some evidence for the modification of the microbiome and for interaction with sweet taste receptors in the oral cavity and the intestines' modification of secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY), ghrelin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), which may affect glycaemia following consumption of NNS. In conclusion, long-term studies of NNS consumption are required to draw a firm conclusion about the role of NNS consumption on glycaemic control.
Authors: H Shigeta; T Yoshida; M Nakai; H Mori; Y Kano; H Nishioka; S Kajiyama; Y Kitagawa; T Kanatsuna; M Kondo Journal: J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: W Chamulitrat; S J Jordan; R P Mason; A L Litton; J G Wilson; E R Wood; G Wolberg; L Molina y Vedia Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 1995-01-10 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Dong Hee Shin; Ji Hye Lee; Myung Shin Kang; Tae Hoon Kim; Su Jin Jeong; Chong Hwa Kim; Sang Soo Kim; In Joo Kim Journal: Diabetes Metab J Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 5.376
Authors: Robert F Margolskee; Jane Dyer; Zaza Kokrashvili; Kieron S H Salmon; Erwin Ilegems; Kristian Daly; Emeline L Maillet; Yuzo Ninomiya; Bedrich Mosinger; Soraya P Shirazi-Beechey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joan Serrano; Kathleen R Smith; Audra L Crouch; Vandana Sharma; Fanchao Yi; Veronika Vargova; Traci E LaMoia; Lydia M Dupont; Vanida Serna; Fenfen Tang; Laisa Gomes-Dias; Joshua J Blakeslee; Emmanuel Hatzakis; Scott N Peterson; Matthew Anderson; Richard E Pratley; George A Kyriazis Journal: Microbiome Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Ibrahim I Gosadi; Ayedh K Alamri; Rana A Saleh; Badr A Almutairi; Mohammed A Batais; Nada K Alamri Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 4.219