Yuri E Nikiforov1, Raja R Seethala1, Giovanni Tallini2, Zubair W Baloch3, Fulvio Basolo4, Lester D R Thompson5, Justine A Barletta6, Bruce M Wenig7, Abir Al Ghuzlan8, Kennichi Kakudo9, Thomas J Giordano10,10, Venancio A Alves11,11, Elham Khanafshar12, Sylvia L Asa13, Adel K El-Naggar14, William E Gooding15, Steven P Hodak16, Ricardo V Lloyd17, Guy Maytal18, Ozgur Mete13, Marina N Nikiforova1, Vania Nosé19, Mauro Papotti20, David N Poller21, Peter M Sadow19,12, Arthur S Tischler22, R Michael Tuttle23, Kathryn B Wall24, Virginia A LiVolsi3, Gregory W Randolph25, Ronald A Ghossein26. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Anatomic Pathology, Department of Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia. 4. Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 5. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills. 6. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York. 8. Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France. 9. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nara Hospital, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Ikoma-city, Japan. 10. Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 11. Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil 12. Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco. 13. Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 14. Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 15. Biostatistics Facility, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 16. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, New York University School of Medicine, New York. 17. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison. 18. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 19. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 20. Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy. 21. University of Portsmouth, Department of Pathology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 22. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 23. Department of Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 24. Thyroid Cancer Survivors Association Inc, Raleigh, North Carolina. 25. General and Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery Division, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston. 26. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Although growing evidence points to highly indolent behavior of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC), most patients with EFVPTC are treated as having conventional thyroid cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes, refine diagnostic criteria, and develop a nomenclature that appropriately reflects the biological and clinical characteristics of EFVPTC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: International, multidisciplinary, retrospective study of patients with thyroid nodules diagnosed as EFVPTC, including 109 patients with noninvasive EFVPTC observed for 10 to 26 years and 101 patients with invasive EFVPTC observed for 1 to 18 years. Review of digitized histologic slides collected at 13 sites in 5 countries by 24 thyroid pathologists from 7 countries. A series of teleconferences and a face-to-face conference were used to establish consensus diagnostic criteria and develop new nomenclature. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Frequency of adverse outcomes, including death from disease, distant or locoregional metastases, and structural or biochemical recurrence, in patients with noninvasive and invasive EFVPTC diagnosed on the basis of a set of reproducible histopathologic criteria. RESULTS: Consensus diagnostic criteria for EFVPTC were developed by 24 thyroid pathologists. All of the 109 patients with noninvasive EFVPTC (67 treated with only lobectomy, none received radioactive iodine ablation) were alive with no evidence of disease at final follow-up (median [range], 13 [10-26] years). An adverse event was seen in 12 of 101 (12%) of the cases of invasive EFVPTC, including 5 patients developing distant metastases, 2 of whom died of disease. Based on the outcome information for noninvasive EFVPTC, the name "noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features" (NIFTP) was adopted. A simplified diagnostic nuclear scoring scheme was developed and validated, yielding a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI, 96.3%-99.4%), specificity of 90.1% (95% CI, 86.0%-93.1%), and overall classification accuracy of 94.3% (95% CI, 92.1%-96.0%) for NIFTP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Thyroid tumors currently diagnosed as noninvasive EFVPTC have a very low risk of adverse outcome and should be termed NIFTP. This reclassification will affect a large population of patients worldwide and result in a significant reduction in psychological and clinical consequences associated with the diagnosis of cancer.
IMPORTANCE: Although growing evidence points to highly indolent behavior of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC), most patients with EFVPTC are treated as having conventional thyroid cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes, refine diagnostic criteria, and develop a nomenclature that appropriately reflects the biological and clinical characteristics of EFVPTC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: International, multidisciplinary, retrospective study of patients with thyroid nodules diagnosed as EFVPTC, including 109 patients with noninvasive EFVPTC observed for 10 to 26 years and 101 patients with invasive EFVPTC observed for 1 to 18 years. Review of digitized histologic slides collected at 13 sites in 5 countries by 24 thyroid pathologists from 7 countries. A series of teleconferences and a face-to-face conference were used to establish consensus diagnostic criteria and develop new nomenclature. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Frequency of adverse outcomes, including death from disease, distant or locoregional metastases, and structural or biochemical recurrence, in patients with noninvasive and invasive EFVPTC diagnosed on the basis of a set of reproducible histopathologic criteria. RESULTS: Consensus diagnostic criteria for EFVPTC were developed by 24 thyroid pathologists. All of the 109 patients with noninvasive EFVPTC (67 treated with only lobectomy, none received radioactive iodine ablation) were alive with no evidence of disease at final follow-up (median [range], 13 [10-26] years). An adverse event was seen in 12 of 101 (12%) of the cases of invasive EFVPTC, including 5 patients developing distant metastases, 2 of whom died of disease. Based on the outcome information for noninvasive EFVPTC, the name "noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features" (NIFTP) was adopted. A simplified diagnostic nuclear scoring scheme was developed and validated, yielding a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI, 96.3%-99.4%), specificity of 90.1% (95% CI, 86.0%-93.1%), and overall classification accuracy of 94.3% (95% CI, 92.1%-96.0%) for NIFTP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Thyroid tumors currently diagnosed as noninvasive EFVPTC have a very low risk of adverse outcome and should be termed NIFTP. This reclassification will affect a large population of patients worldwide and result in a significant reduction in psychological and clinical consequences associated with the diagnosis of cancer.
Authors: Jeffrey Liu; Bhuvanesh Singh; Giovanni Tallini; Diane L Carlson; Nora Katabi; Ashok Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Ronald A Ghossein Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ricardo V Lloyd; Lori A Erickson; Mary B Casey; King Y Lam; Christine M Lohse; Sylvia L Asa; John K C Chan; Ronald A DeLellis; H Ruben Harach; Kennichi Kakudo; Virginia A LiVolsi; Juan Rosai; Thomas J Sebo; Manuel Sobrinho-Simoes; Bruce M Wenig; Marick E Lae Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Yuri E Nikiforov; Sally E Carty; Simon I Chiosea; Christopher Coyne; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; William E Gooding; Steven P Hodak; Shane O LeBeau; N Paul Ohori; Raja R Seethala; Mitchell E Tublin; Linwah Yip; Marina N Nikiforova Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kensey Bergdorf; Donna C Ferguson; Mitra Mehrad; Kim Ely; Thomas Stricker; Vivian L Weiss Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Miguel Paja; Carles Zafón; Carmela Iglesias; Aitziber Ugalde; Jose Manuel Cameselle-Teijeiro; Gemma Rodríguez-Carnero; Pilar Fernández-Seara; Emma Anda; Antónia Povoa; Hernán Quiceno; Nancy M Sánchez-Gómez; Clarisa González; Luis García-Pascual; Inés Gómez de la Riva; Concha Blanco; Telma Meizoso; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre; Ismael Capel; María Victoria Ortega; Isabel Mancha; Montserrat Chao; Victoria Alcázar; Esther Roselló; Javier Maravall; Susana López-Agulló; Antonia Pérez-Lázaro; Pascual Meseguer; Javier Sanz; Jose J Paricio; Saioa Echeverría; Ángel Castaño; Rosa M Bella Journal: Endocrine Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Jarosław Jendrzejewski; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Andrew Eiterman; Andrew Thomas; Huiling He; Rebecca Nagy; Leigha Senter; Krzysztof Sworczak; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 7.396