Literature DB >> 16647128

The course of intermittent exotropia in a population-based cohort.

Kevin J Nusz1, Brian G Mohney, Nancy N Diehl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in the angle of deviation in an incidence cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with intermittent exotropia during a 20-year period.
DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based observational study. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatric (<19 years old) residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota diagnosed with intermittent exotropia (> or =10 prism diopters) from January 1, 1975 through December 31, 1994.
METHODS: The medical records of all potential patients identified by the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The change in the angle of deviation and its association with treatment were reviewed for each patient.
RESULTS: A total of 184 pediatric patients were diagnosed during the study period, of which 138 patients (75.0%) had > or =2 examinations. The deviation resolved in 5 of the 138 patients (3.6%) during a median follow-up of 9.2 years, while the Kaplan-Meier rate of increasing by 10 or more prism diopters (PD) was 23.1% at 5 years and 52.8% at 20 years. The distance deviation increased by a median of 5 PD during the preoperative period in the 55 patients who underwent surgery during a mean follow-up of 3.2 years compared with a zero PD median change in the 83 patients who avoided surgery during a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. The Kaplan-Meier probability of undergoing surgery within 20 years after diagnosis was 74.0% in this population. We were unable to detect a significant association between nonsurgical treatments and a change in the angle of deviation.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort of pediatric patients with intermittent exotropia, the deviation resolved in 4%, and more than half of the patients were expected to have an increase of 10 or more PD within 20 years of their diagnosis. Children who received surgery in this population were significantly more likely to have demonstrated an increase in their deviation during the preoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647128     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  37 in total

1.  Hyperopic refractive errors as a prognostic factor in intermittent exotropia surgery.

Authors:  M K Kim; U S Kim; M-J Cho; S-H Baek
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Capturing the Moment of Fusion Loss in Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Contrasting effects of strabismic amblyopia on metabolic activity in superficial and deep layers of striate cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L Adams; John R Economides; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Comparative study of plication-recession versus resection-recession in unilateral surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Yugo Kimura; Tohru Kimura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Normal Topography and Binocularity of the Superior Colliculus in Strabismus.

Authors:  John R Economides; Brittany C Rapone; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The use of the Newcastle Control Score in the management of intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Deborah Buck; Sarah R Hatt; Helen Haggerty; Susan Hrisos; Nicholas P Strong; Nicholas I Steen; Michael P Clarke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Risk factors associated with poor outcome after medial rectus resection for recurrent intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Jihei Sara Lee; Jinu Han; Sueng-Han Han
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Stability of near stereoacuity in childhood intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Michael C Brodsky; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Variability of stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; Brian G Mohney; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Survival analysis following early surgical success in intermittent exotropia surgery.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Lee; Sung Ju Ko; Sung Uk Baek
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.