Literature DB >> 28074417

Influence of the marvelous™ three-way stopcock on the natural frequency and damping coefficient in blood pressure transducer kits.

Shigeki Joseph Luke Fujiwara1,2,3, Keiichi Tachihara4, Satoshi Mori5, Kentaro Ouchi6, Shoko Itakura7, Michiko Yasuda7, Takashi Hitosugi6, Uno Imaizumi7, Yoichiro Miki8, Izumi Toyoguchi9, Kazu-Ichi Yoshida7, Takeshi Yokoyama6.   

Abstract

Two types of Planecta™ ports are commonly used as sampling ports in blood pressure transducer kits: a flat-type port (FTP) and a port with a three-way stopcock (PTS). Recently, a new type of three-way stopcock (Marvelous™) has been released as a Planecta™ counterpart, but its effects on the frequency characteristics and reliability of blood pressure monitoring have not been investigated. We assessed the influence of the Marvelous™ stopcock on the frequency characteristics of the pressure transducer kit. The basic pressure transducer kit, DT4812J, was modified by replacing one or two of the original three-way stopcocks with Marvelous™ stopcocks. The frequency characteristics (i.e., natural frequency and damping coefficient) of each kit were determined using wave parameter analysis software, and subsequently evaluated on a Gardner chart. Replacement of the original blood pressure transducer kit stopcocks with Marvelous™ stopcocks decreased the natural frequency (48.3 Hz) to 46.3 Hz or 44.8 Hz, respectively; the damping coefficient was not significantly changed. Plotting the data on a Gardner chart revealed that the changes fell within the adequate dynamic response region, indicating they were within the allowable range. Insertion of Marvelous™ stopcocks slightly affects the natural frequency of the pressure transducer kit, similar to inserting a PTS. The results indicate that the Marvelous™ stopcock is useful for accurate monitoring of arterial blood pressure, and may be recommended when insertion of two or more closed-loop blood sampling systems is necessary.

Keywords:  Blood pressure transducer kits; Damping coefficient; Intra-arterial pressure wave; Marvelous™; Natural frequency; Three-way stopcock

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074417     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-9979-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  9 in total

1.  Effect of using a Planecta™ port with a three-way stopcock on the natural frequency of blood pressure transducer kits.

Authors:  Shigeki Fujiwara; Keiichi Tachihara; Satoshi Mori; Kentaro Ouchi; Chizuko Yokoe; Uno Imaizumi; Yoshinari Morimoto; Yoichiro Miki; Izumi Toyoguchi; Kazu-Ichi Yoshida; Takeshi Yokoyama
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Dynamic response of liquid-filled catheter systems for measurement of blood pressure: precision of measurements and reliability of the Pressure Recording Analytical Method with different disposable systems.

Authors:  Stefano Romagnoli; Salvatore Mario Romano; Sergio Bevilacqua; Chiara Lazzeri; Gian Franco Gensini; Carlo Pratesi; Diego Quattrone; Daniele Dini; Angelo Raffaele De Gaudio
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Recommendation of a clinical impulse response analysis for catheter calibration-dumping coefficient and natural frequency are incomplete parameters for clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Hiroaki Watanabe; Shin-ichi Yagi; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Evaluation of dynamic performance in liquid-filled catheter systems for measuring invasive blood pressure.

Authors:  M Todorovic; E W Jensen; C Thøgersen
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1996-08

5.  Microbial contamination of arterial infusions used for hemodynamic monitoring: a randomized trial of contamination with sampling through conventional stopcocks versus a novel closed system.

Authors:  S Crow; S A Conrad; C Chaney-Rowell; J W King
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Frequency characteristics of pressure transducer kits with inserted pressure-resistant extension tubes.

Authors:  Shigeki Fujiwara; Satoshi Mori; Keiichi Tachihara; Takeshi Yamamoto; Chizuko Yokoe; Uno Imaizumi; Yoshinari Morimoto; Yoichiro Miki; Izumi Toyoguchi; Kazu-Ichi Yoshida; Takeshi Yokoyama
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Direct blood pressure measurement--dynamic response requirements.

Authors:  R M Gardner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  An evaluation of blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  W B Runciman; A J Rutten; A H Ilsley
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 1.669

9.  Effect of planecta and ROSE™ on the frequency characteristics of blood pressure-transducer kits.

Authors:  Shigeki Fujiwara; Yoshifumi Kawakubo; Satoshi Mori; Keiichi Tachihara; Izumi Toyoguchi; Takeshi Yokoyama
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.502

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Predictive Values for Time from Transducer Stopcock Closure to Accurate Intracranial Pressure Reading.

Authors:  Corrie Earthman; Kathrina Siaron; Jennifer Wilson; DaiWai M Olson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.532

2.  Intraarterial catheter diameter and dynamic response of arterial pressure monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hyongmin Oh; Suk Hyung Choe; Yoon Jung Kim; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Hyung-Chul Lee; Hee-Pyoung Park
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.