H A Yu1,2, C Sima3, D Feldman1, L L Liu4,5, B Vaitheesvaran6, J Cross6, C M Rudin1,2, M G Kris1,2, W Pao7, F Michor4,5, G J Riely1,2. 1. Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. 2. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 6. Donald B. and Catherine C. Marron Cancer Metabolism Center, Sloan Kettering Institute, Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. 7. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
Background: Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develop clinical resistance, most commonly with acquisition of EGFR T790M. Evolutionary modeling suggests that a schedule of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib may delay emergence of EGFR T790M. Pulse dose erlotinib has superior central nervous system (CNS) penetration and may result in superior CNS disease control. Methods: We evaluated toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib. We assessed six escalating pulse doses of erlotinib. Results: We enrolled 34 patients; 11 patients (32%) had brain metastases at study entry. We observed 3 dose-limiting toxicities in dose escalation: transaminitis, mucositis, and rash. The MTD was erlotinib 1200 mg days 1-2 and 50 mg days 3-7 weekly. The most frequent toxicities (any grade) were rash, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and mucositis. 1 complete and 24 partial responses were observed (74%, 95% CI 60-84%). Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI 5.8-15.4 months). No patient had progression of an untreated CNS metastasis or developed a new CNS lesion while on study (0%, 95% CI 0-13%). Of the 18 patients with biopsies at progression, EGFR T790M was identified in 78% (95% CI 54-91%). Conclusion: This is the first clinical implementation of an anti-cancer TKI regimen combining pulse and daily low-dose administration. This evolutionary modeling-based dosing schedule was well-tolerated but did not improve progression-free survival or prevent emergence of EGFR T790M, likely due to insufficient peak serum concentrations of erlotinib. This dosing schedule prevented progression of untreated or any new central nervous system metastases in all patients.
Background: Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develop clinical resistance, most commonly with acquisition of EGFRT790M. Evolutionary modeling suggests that a schedule of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib may delay emergence of EGFRT790M. Pulse dose erlotinib has superior central nervous system (CNS) penetration and may result in superior CNS disease control. Methods: We evaluated toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib. We assessed six escalating pulse doses of erlotinib. Results: We enrolled 34 patients; 11 patients (32%) had brain metastases at study entry. We observed 3 dose-limiting toxicities in dose escalation: transaminitis, mucositis, and rash. The MTD was erlotinib 1200 mg days 1-2 and 50 mg days 3-7 weekly. The most frequent toxicities (any grade) were rash, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and mucositis. 1 complete and 24 partial responses were observed (74%, 95% CI 60-84%). Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI 5.8-15.4 months). No patient had progression of an untreated CNS metastasis or developed a new CNS lesion while on study (0%, 95% CI 0-13%). Of the 18 patients with biopsies at progression, EGFRT790M was identified in 78% (95% CI 54-91%). Conclusion: This is the first clinical implementation of an anti-cancer TKI regimen combining pulse and daily low-dose administration. This evolutionary modeling-based dosing schedule was well-tolerated but did not improve progression-free survival or prevent emergence of EGFRT790M, likely due to insufficient peak serum concentrations of erlotinib. This dosing schedule prevented progression of untreated or any new central nervous system metastases in all patients.
Authors: Melissa L Johnson; Helena A Yu; Eric M Hart; Bing Bing Weitner; Alfred W Rademaker; Jyoti D Patel; Mark G Kris; Gregory J Riely Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Juliann Chmielecki; Jasmine Foo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Katherine Hutchinson; Kadoaki Ohashi; Romel Somwar; Lu Wang; Katherine R Amato; Maria Arcila; Martin L Sos; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; Elisa de Stanchina; Michelle S Ginsberg; Roman K Thomas; Mark G Kris; Akira Inoue; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; Franziska Michor; William Pao Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Noemi Reguart; Rafael Rosell; Felipe Cardenal; Andres F Cardona; Dolores Isla; Ramon Palmero; Teresa Moran; Christian Rolfo; M Cinta Pallarès; Amelia Insa; Enric Carcereny; Margarita Majem; Javier De Castro; Cristina Queralt; Miguel A Molina; Miquel Taron Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Stephanie Heon; Beow Y Yeap; Neal I Lindeman; Victoria A Joshi; Mohit Butaney; Gregory J Britt; Daniel B Costa; Michael S Rabin; David M Jackman; Bruce E Johnson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Jean-Charles Soria; Jonathan W Goldman; Heather A Wakelee; Shirish M Gadgeel; Andrea Varga; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Benjamin J Solomon; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Dara L Aisner; Robert C Doebele; Cathy Galasso; Edward B Garon; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Logan; Joel W Neal; Melody A Mendenhall; Suzanne Nichols; Zofia Piotrowska; Antoinette J Wozniak; Mitch Raponi; Chris A Karlovich; Sarah Jaw-Tsai; Jeffrey Isaacson; Darrin Despain; Shannon L Matheny; Lindsey Rolfe; Andrew R Allen; D Ross Camidge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Antonio M P Omuro; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Enrico Franceschi; Neelam Shah; Daniel T Milton; Lauren E Abrey Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Pasi A Jänne; Xiaofei Wang; Mark A Socinski; Jeffrey Crawford; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Lin Gu; Marzia Capelletti; Martin J Edelman; Miguel A Villalona-Calero; Robert Kratzke; Everett E Vokes; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathryn C Arbour; Mark G Kris; Gregory J Riely; Ai Ni; Kathryn Beal; Mariza Daras; Sara A Hayes; Robert J Young; Christopher R Rodriguez; Linda Ahn; William Pao; Helena A Yu Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David M McClatchy; Henning Willers; Aaron N Hata; Zofia Piotrowska; Lecia V Sequist; Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Helena A Yu; Myung-Ju Ahn; Byoung Chul Cho; David E Gerber; Ronald B Natale; Mark A Socinski; Nagdeep Giri; Susan Quinn; Eric Sbar; Hui Zhang; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 5.705