PURPOSE: This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the impact of initial gefitinib or erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, EGFR-TKI) versus chemotherapy on the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with stage IV or relapsed NSCLC with a sensitizing EGFR mutation initially treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or chemotherapy were identified. The cumulative risk of CNS progression was calculated using death as a competing risk. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients were eligible (EGFR-TKI: 101, chemotherapy: 54). Twenty-four patients (24%) in the EGFR-TKI group and 12 patients (22%) in the chemotherapy group had brain metastases at the time of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC (P = 1.000); 32 of the 36 received CNS therapy before initiating systemic treatment. Thirty-three patients (33%) in the EGFR-TKI group and 26 patients (48%) in the chemotherapy group developed CNS progression after a median follow-up of 25 months. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month cumulative risk of CNS progression was 1%, 6%, and 21% in the EGFR-TKI group compared with corresponding rates of 7%, 19%, and 32% in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.026). The HR of CNS progression for upfront EGFR-TKI versus chemotherapy was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.94]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show lower rates of CNS progression in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients initially treated with an EGFR-TKI compared with upfront chemotherapy. If validated, our results suggest that gefitinib and erlotinib may have a role in the chemoprevention of CNS metastases from NSCLC.
PURPOSE: This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the impact of initial gefitinib or erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, EGFR-TKI) versus chemotherapy on the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with stage IV or relapsed NSCLC with a sensitizing EGFR mutation initially treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or chemotherapy were identified. The cumulative risk of CNS progression was calculated using death as a competing risk. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients were eligible (EGFR-TKI: 101, chemotherapy: 54). Twenty-four patients (24%) in the EGFR-TKI group and 12 patients (22%) in the chemotherapy group had brain metastases at the time of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC (P = 1.000); 32 of the 36 received CNS therapy before initiating systemic treatment. Thirty-three patients (33%) in the EGFR-TKI group and 26 patients (48%) in the chemotherapy group developed CNS progression after a median follow-up of 25 months. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month cumulative risk of CNS progression was 1%, 6%, and 21% in the EGFR-TKI group compared with corresponding rates of 7%, 19%, and 32% in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.026). The HR of CNS progression for upfront EGFR-TKI versus chemotherapy was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.94]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show lower rates of CNS progression in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLCpatients initially treated with an EGFR-TKI compared with upfront chemotherapy. If validated, our results suggest that gefitinib and erlotinib may have a role in the chemoprevention of CNS metastases from NSCLC.
Authors: Daniel B Costa; Kim-Son H Nguyen; Byoung C Cho; Lecia V Sequist; David M Jackman; Gregory J Riely; Beow Y Yeap; Balázs Halmos; Joo H Kim; Pasi A Jänne; Mark S Huberman; William Pao; Daniel G Tenen; Susumu Kobayashi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Young Joo Lee; In Kyu Park; Moo-Suk Park; Hye Jin Choi; Byoung Chul Cho; Kyung Young Chung; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Jin Wook Moon; Hoguen Kim; Sung Ho Choi; Joo-Hang Kim Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: David Jackman; William Pao; Gregory J Riely; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mark G Kris; Pasi A Jänne; Thomas Lynch; Bruce E Johnson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Taofeek K Owonikoko; Jack Arbiser; Amelia Zelnak; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Adam M Robin; Steven N Kalkanis; Timothy G Whitsett; Bodour Salhia; Nhan L Tran; Timothy Ryken; Michael K Moore; Kathleen M Egan; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Michael Offin; Daniel Feldman; Ai Ni; Mackenzie L Myers; W Victoria Lai; Elena Pentsova; Adrienne Boire; Mariza Daras; Emmet J Jordan; David B Solit; Maria E Arcila; David R Jones; James M Isbell; Kathryn Beal; Robert J Young; Charles M Rudin; Gregory J Riely; Alexander Drilon; Viviane Tabar; Lisa M DeAngelis; Helena A Yu; Mark G Kris; Bob T Li Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H A Yu; C Sima; D Feldman; L L Liu; B Vaitheesvaran; J Cross; C M Rudin; M G Kris; W Pao; F Michor; G J Riely Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Paolo Borghetti; Marco Lorenzo Bonù; Elisa Roca; Sara Pedretti; Emiliano Salah; Anna Baiguini; Diana Greco; Luca Triggiani; Marta Maddalo; Niccolò Giaj Levra; Filippo Alongi; Stefano Maria Magrini; Michela Buglione Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.155