Kathryn C Arbour1, Mark G Kris1,2, Gregory J Riely1,2, Ai Ni3, Kathryn Beal4, Mariza Daras5, Sara A Hayes6, Robert J Young6, Christopher R Rodriguez1, Linda Ahn1, William Pao7, Helena A Yu1,2. 1. Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 7. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a phase 1 study of pulse/continuous-dose erlotinib, no patient had disease progression in the central nervous system (CNS). This expansion cohort of the phase 1 study tested the same regimen in a cohort of individuals with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers with untreated brain metastases. METHODS: Patients had not received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or radiation for brain metastases. All received 1200 mg of erlotinib on days 1 and 2 and 50 mg on days 3 to 7 weekly. The primary endpoints were the overall and CNS response rates (according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). RESULTS: Between May 2015 and August 2016, 19 patients were enrolled. Forty-two percent of the patients had target brain lesions, and the median size of the target brain lesions was 13 mm. Overall, 14 patients (74%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51%-89%) had partial responses. The response rate in brain metastases was 75%. The overall median progression-free survival was 10 months (95% CI, 7 months to not reached). Only 3 patients (16%) had CNS progression. To date, 4 patients required CNS radiation at some time during their course. The adverse events (any grade) seen in 10% or more of the patients were rash, diarrhea, nausea, an increase in alanine aminotransferase, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse/continuous-dose erlotinib produced a 74% overall response rate and a 75% response rate in brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers and untreated brain metastases. CNS control persisted even after progression elsewhere. Although this regimen did not improve progression-free survival or delay the emergence of EGFR T790M, it prevented progression in the brain and could be useful in situations in which CNS control is critical. Cancer 2018;124:105-9.
BACKGROUND: In a phase 1 study of pulse/continuous-dose erlotinib, no patient had disease progression in the central nervous system (CNS). This expansion cohort of the phase 1 study tested the same regimen in a cohort of individuals with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers with untreated brain metastases. METHODS:Patients had not received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or radiation for brain metastases. All received 1200 mg of erlotinib on days 1 and 2 and 50 mg on days 3 to 7 weekly. The primary endpoints were the overall and CNS response rates (according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). RESULTS: Between May 2015 and August 2016, 19 patients were enrolled. Forty-two percent of the patients had target brain lesions, and the median size of the target brain lesions was 13 mm. Overall, 14 patients (74%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51%-89%) had partial responses. The response rate in brain metastases was 75%. The overall median progression-free survival was 10 months (95% CI, 7 months to not reached). Only 3 patients (16%) had CNS progression. To date, 4 patients required CNS radiation at some time during their course. The adverse events (any grade) seen in 10% or more of the patients were rash, diarrhea, nausea, an increase in alanine aminotransferase, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse/continuous-dose erlotinib produced a 74% overall response rate and a 75% response rate in brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers and untreated brain metastases. CNS control persisted even after progression elsewhere. Although this regimen did not improve progression-free survival or delay the emergence of EGFRT790M, it prevented progression in the brain and could be useful in situations in which CNS control is critical. Cancer 2018;124:105-9.
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Enric Carcereny; Radj Gervais; Alain Vergnenegre; Bartomeu Massuti; Enriqueta Felip; Ramon Palmero; Ramon Garcia-Gomez; Cinta Pallares; Jose Miguel Sanchez; Rut Porta; Manuel Cobo; Pilar Garrido; Flavia Longo; Teresa Moran; Amelia Insa; Filippo De Marinis; Romain Corre; Isabel Bover; Alfonso Illiano; Eric Dansin; Javier de Castro; Michele Milella; Noemi Reguart; Giuseppe Altavilla; Ulpiano Jimenez; Mariano Provencio; Miguel Angel Moreno; Josefa Terrasa; Jose Muñoz-Langa; Javier Valdivia; Dolores Isla; Manuel Domine; Olivier Molinier; Julien Mazieres; Nathalie Baize; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Gilles Robinet; Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Vittorio Gebbia; Lioba Ferrera-Delgado; Pierre Bombaron; Reyes Bernabe; Alessandra Bearz; Angel Artal; Enrico Cortesi; Christian Rolfo; Maria Sanchez-Ronco; Ana Drozdowskyj; Cristina Queralt; Itziar de Aguirre; Jose Luis Ramirez; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miguel Angel Molina; Miquel Taron; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Juliann Chmielecki; Jasmine Foo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Katherine Hutchinson; Kadoaki Ohashi; Romel Somwar; Lu Wang; Katherine R Amato; Maria Arcila; Martin L Sos; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; Elisa de Stanchina; Michelle S Ginsberg; Roman K Thomas; Mark G Kris; Akira Inoue; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; Franziska Michor; William Pao Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Stephanie Heon; Beow Y Yeap; Neal I Lindeman; Victoria A Joshi; Mohit Butaney; Gregory J Britt; Daniel B Costa; Michael S Rabin; David M Jackman; Bruce E Johnson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christian Grommes; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; William Pao; Andrei I Holodny; Jennifer L Clarke; Andrew B Lassman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Antonio M P Omuro; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Enrico Franceschi; Neelam Shah; Daniel T Milton; Lauren E Abrey Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Pasi A Jänne; Xiaofei Wang; Mark A Socinski; Jeffrey Crawford; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Lin Gu; Marzia Capelletti; Martin J Edelman; Miguel A Villalona-Calero; Robert Kratzke; Everett E Vokes; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James W Welsh; Ritsuko Komaki; Arya Amini; Mark F Munsell; Wyatt Unger; Pamela K Allen; Joe Y Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Susan L McGovern; Linda L Garland; Su S Chen; Jamie Holt; Zhongxing Liao; Paul Brown; Erik Sulman; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Baldassarre Stea Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Deepa Rangachari; Ciric To; Jason E Shpilsky; Paul A VanderLaan; Susumu S Kobayashi; Mierzhati Mushajiang; Christie J Lau; Cloud P Paweletz; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 15.609