Literature DB >> 32592074

Do patient factors influence embryologists' decisions to freeze borderline blastocysts?

T Burns1, E R Hammond2, L Cree2,3, D E Morbeck4,5, N S Consedine1.   

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: To investigate whether patient factors influence the decision to freeze a blastocyst with low implantation potential.
DESIGN: This experimental study assessed 170 practicing embryologists from a variety of countries who were recruited via an online survey. Participants were currently practicing embryologists, who grade blastocysts as part of this role. The survey presented decision-making 'vignettes' to participants. These included specific patient information, as well as an image of an expanded blastocyst that was of borderline quality for inner cell mass and trophectoderm, for which the embryologist selected whether or not to freeze. High/low maternal age, the presence/absence of other top quality blastocysts, and the presence/absence of previously unsuccessful IVF cycles were systematically varied within the patient information in a 2 × 2 × 2 design. Participants reported how likely they would be to freeze a particular blastocyst on a scale of 1 (Extremely Unlikely) to 7 (Extremely Likely), and whether or not they would ultimately freeze each blastocyst (Yes or No).
RESULTS: Lower maternal age, no other high-quality blastocysts within the cohort, and multiple unsuccessful IVF cycles were associated with greater likelihood of recommending to freeze (P < .001). Furthermore, significant interactions among all three patient factors were noted.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence suggesting that when faced with an uncertain blastocyst, factors pertaining to the patient (maternal age, the presence/absence of other top quality blastocysts, and the presence/absence of previously unsuccessful IVF cycles) influence the decision to freeze.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst Grading; Borderline; Decision; Embryo; Uncertain

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32592074      PMCID: PMC7468049          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01843-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  21 in total

1.  An agenda for clinical decision making and judgement in nursing research and education.

Authors:  Carl Thompson; Leanne Aitken; Diane Doran; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 2.  What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion.

Authors:  Lukasz T Polanski; Miriam N Baumgarten; Siobhan Quenby; Jan Brosens; Bruce K Campbell; Nicholas J Raine-Fenning
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  The thinking doctor: clinical decision making in contemporary medicine.

Authors:  Michael Trimble; Paul Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Reliability and agreement on embryo assessment: 5 years of an external quality control programme.

Authors:  Luis Martínez-Granados; María Serrano; Antonio González-Utor; Nereyda Ortiz; Vicente Badajoz; María Luisa López-Regalado; Montserrat Boada; Jose A Castilla
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ashleigh Storr; Christos A Venetis; Simon Cooke; Suha Kilani; William Ledger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singletons after single blastocyst transfer: is there any difference according to blastocyst morphology?

Authors:  Céline Bouillon; Noémie Celton; Sandra Kassem; Cynthia Frapsauce; Fabrice Guérif
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Extended embryo culture in human assisted reproduction treatments.

Authors:  M T Langley; D M Marek; D K Gardner; K M Doody; K J Doody
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Daria Soscia; Alberto Vaiarelli; Roberta Maggiulli; Antonio Capalbo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Laura Rienzi; Danilo Cimadomo; Roberta Maggiulli; Thomas Elliott; Graham Wright; Zsolt Peter Nagy; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The impact of age on blastocyst scoring after single and double embryo transfers.

Authors:  Adriana Bos-Mikich; Marcus S Michels; Caroline G Dutra; Norma P Oliveira; Marcelo O Ferreira; Douglas C Aquino; Nilo Frantz
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.