T Burns1, E R Hammond2, L Cree2,3, D E Morbeck4,5, N S Consedine1. 1. Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. 2. Fertility Associates, Remuera, Auckland, 1051, New Zealand. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. 4. Fertility Associates, Remuera, Auckland, 1051, New Zealand. deanmorbeckphd@gmail.com. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. deanmorbeckphd@gmail.com.
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION: To investigate whether patient factors influence the decision to freeze a blastocyst with low implantation potential. DESIGN: This experimental study assessed 170 practicing embryologists from a variety of countries who were recruited via an online survey. Participants were currently practicing embryologists, who grade blastocysts as part of this role. The survey presented decision-making 'vignettes' to participants. These included specific patient information, as well as an image of an expanded blastocyst that was of borderline quality for inner cell mass and trophectoderm, for which the embryologist selected whether or not to freeze. High/low maternal age, the presence/absence of other top quality blastocysts, and the presence/absence of previously unsuccessful IVF cycles were systematically varied within the patient information in a 2 × 2 × 2 design. Participants reported how likely they would be to freeze a particular blastocyst on a scale of 1 (Extremely Unlikely) to 7 (Extremely Likely), and whether or not they would ultimately freeze each blastocyst (Yes or No). RESULTS: Lower maternal age, no other high-quality blastocysts within the cohort, and multiple unsuccessful IVF cycles were associated with greater likelihood of recommending to freeze (P < .001). Furthermore, significant interactions among all three patient factors were noted. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence suggesting that when faced with an uncertain blastocyst, factors pertaining to the patient (maternal age, the presence/absence of other top quality blastocysts, and the presence/absence of previously unsuccessful IVF cycles) influence the decision to freeze.
RESEARCH QUESTION: To investigate whether patient factors influence the decision to freeze a blastocyst with low implantation potential. DESIGN: This experimental study assessed 170 practicing embryologists from a variety of countries who were recruited via an online survey. Participants were currently practicing embryologists, who grade blastocysts as part of this role. The survey presented decision-making 'vignettes' to participants. These included specific patient information, as well as an image of an expanded blastocyst that was of borderline quality for inner cell mass and trophectoderm, for which the embryologist selected whether or not to freeze. High/low maternal age, the presence/absence of other top quality blastocysts, and the presence/absence of previously unsuccessful IVF cycles were systematically varied within the patient information in a 2 × 2 × 2 design. Participants reported how likely they would be to freeze a particular blastocyst on a scale of 1 (Extremely Unlikely) to 7 (Extremely Likely), and whether or not they would ultimately freeze each blastocyst (Yes or No). RESULTS: Lower maternal age, no other high-quality blastocysts within the cohort, and multiple unsuccessful IVF cycles were associated with greater likelihood of recommending to freeze (P < .001). Furthermore, significant interactions among all three patient factors were noted. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence suggesting that when faced with an uncertain blastocyst, factors pertaining to the patient (maternal age, the presence/absence of other top quality blastocysts, and the presence/absence of previously unsuccessful IVF cycles) influence the decision to freeze.
Authors: Lukasz T Polanski; Miriam N Baumgarten; Siobhan Quenby; Jan Brosens; Bruce K Campbell; Nicholas J Raine-Fenning Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Luis Martínez-Granados; María Serrano; Antonio González-Utor; Nereyda Ortiz; Vicente Badajoz; María Luisa López-Regalado; Montserrat Boada; Jose A Castilla Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Danilo Cimadomo; Daria Soscia; Alberto Vaiarelli; Roberta Maggiulli; Antonio Capalbo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Antonio Capalbo; Laura Rienzi; Danilo Cimadomo; Roberta Maggiulli; Thomas Elliott; Graham Wright; Zsolt Peter Nagy; Filippo Maria Ubaldi Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Adriana Bos-Mikich; Marcus S Michels; Caroline G Dutra; Norma P Oliveira; Marcelo O Ferreira; Douglas C Aquino; Nilo Frantz Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod Date: 2016-03-01