Literature DB >> 28058494

[Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?]

I Gockel1, D Lorenz2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive resections are increasingly employed in oncologic surgery for esophageal carcinoma. The new German S3 guideline states that esophagectomy, as well as reconstruction of the esophagus, can be performed minimally invasively or in combination with open techniques (hybrid). However, the current value of different techniques - ranging from complete minimally invasive esophagectomy over hybrid to robotic surgery - remains unregarded.This review provides a critical comparison of these techniques based on current evidence. Minimally invasive procedures of oncologic esophageal resection are safe in experienced hands and show numerous advantages with regard to postoperative reconvalescence. Laparoscopic gastrolysis with intra-abdominal lymphadenectomy and muscle sparing as well as anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (also via VATS as single-port technique) as a hybrid method also result in a relevant reduction of postoperative mortality and offer the possibility of extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy, which requires a high level of expertise when performed thoracoscopically. At present, robotic esophagectomy is applied in only a few clinics in Germany. A lack of evidence based on studies for esophageal surgery, as well as high acquisition and operating costs of the robotic system, have to be taken into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive and hybrid esophagectomy; Muscle sparing mini-thoracotomy; Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction; Robotic esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28058494     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-016-0364-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  35 in total

1.  Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Lucy Bailey; Omar Khan; Elizabeth Willows; Shaw Somers; Stuart Mercer; Simon Toh
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 2.  Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Ling Xiong; Rui Li; Hai-Ke Lei; Zheng-Ying Jiang
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus.

Authors:  K C McKeown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  [Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. German version].

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; M F J Seesing; H J F Brenkman; J P Ruurda
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival.

Authors:  A Koen Talsma; Joel Shapiro; Caspar W N Looman; Pieter van Hagen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ate van der Gaast; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Bas P L Wijnhoven; J Jan B van Lanschot; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Geke A P Hospers; Johannes J Bonenkamp; Miguel A Cuesta; Reinoud J B Blaisse; Olivier R C Busch; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Geert-Jan Creemers; Cornelis J A Punt; John T M Plukker; Henk M W Verheul; Herman van Dekken; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Tom Rozema; Katharina Biermann; Jannet C Beukema; Anna H M Piet; Caroline M van Rij; Janny G Reinders; Hugo W Tilanus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  [Lymphadenectomy in tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  J R Siewert; H J Stein; K Böttcher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Extent of Lymphadenectomy and Prognosis After Esophageal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jesper Lagergren; Fredrik Mattsson; Janine Zylstra; Fuju Chang; James Gossage; Robert Mason; Pernilla Lagergren; Andrew Davies
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  K W Maas; M A Cuesta; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J Roig; L Bonavina; C Rosman; S S Gisbertz; S S A Y Biere; D L van der Peet; J H Klinkenbijl; M W Hollmann; E S de Lange; H J Bonjer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  2 in total

1.  The dawning of perioperative care in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Daniel Pfirrmann; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Perikles Simon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  [Endoscopic and surgical treatment of early gastric and esophageal carcinoma].

Authors:  T Haist; M Knabe; A May; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.