Literature DB >> 22753051

Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study.

Lucy Bailey1, Omar Khan, Elizabeth Willows, Shaw Somers, Stuart Mercer, Simon Toh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although a number of studies have examined minimally invasive approaches for oesophagectomy, these procedures have typically been offered only to selected patients with the limited long-term follow-up data. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of performing laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (LAO) for all-comers and to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of this surgical strategy with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone open surgery.
METHODS: From November 2009, all patients referred for trans-thoracic resection of an oesophageal cancer underwent a two-stage laparoscopically assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. This consisted of laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach and distal oesophagus, followed by open thoracotomy, thoracic lymphadectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis. The clinical and oncological outcomes of the first 39 consecutive LAO patients were compared with those of the preceding 31 consecutive patients who had undergone open surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 39 LAO cases, 37 cases were completed laparoscopically and 2 were converted to an open surgery. LAO was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative complications (specifically cardiac and infectious complications) when compared with open surgery (54 vs 77%, P = 0.04). In addition, the initial intensive care unit stay (2 vs 4 days; P = 0.04) and overall length of hospital stay (14 vs 18 days; P = 0.02) were shorter in the LAO group. In terms of pathological outcomes, the lymph node yield and R0 resection rate of the LAO and open groups were comparable, as were the 1-year survival rates (62 vs 61%, P = 0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: LAO can be offered to an unselected cohort of all-comers with a reduced postoperative complication rate and comparable oncological and long-term survival outcomes when compared with open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22753051     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?]

Authors:  I Gockel; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy improves hospital outcomes and reduces cost: a single-institution analysis of laparoscopic-assisted and open techniques.

Authors:  Brett L Ecker; Goda E Savulionyte; Jashodeep Datta; Kristoffel R Dumon; John Kucharczuk; Noel N Williams; Daniel T Dempsey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Li Zhang; Hua Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Wuke Chen; Jianjun He; Ke Wang; Peijun Liu; Yu Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waresijiang Yibulayin; Sikandaer Abulizi; Hongbo Lv; Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Sue J Fu; Vanessa P Ho; Jennifer Ginsberg; Yaron Perry; Conor P Delaney; Philip A Linden; Christopher W Towe
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2016-12-08

6.  Morbidity analysis in minimally invasive esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer versus conventional over the last 10 years, a single institution experience.

Authors:  Misbah Khan; Muhammad Ijaz Ashraf; Aamir Ali Syed; Shahid Khattak; Namra Urooj; Anam Muzaffar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments.

Authors:  Dongni Chen; Weidong Wang; Junxian Mo; Qiannan Ren; Huikai Miao; Youfang Chen; Zhesheng Wen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lu Lv; Weidong Hu; Yanchen Ren; Xiaoxuan Wei
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Siaw-Acheampong; S K Kamarajah; R Gujjuri; J R Bundred; P Singh; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.