Tiffany A Johnson1, Susan Cooper2, Greta C Stamper3, Mark Chertoff1. 1. Hearing and Speech Department, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS. 2. CavCom, Inc., Walker, MN. 3. Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to both occupational and nonoccupational noise is recognized as a risk factor for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Although audiologists routinely inquire regarding history of noise exposure, there are limited tools available for quantifying this history or for identifying those individuals who are at highest risk for NIHL. Identifying those at highest risk would allow hearing conservation activities to be focused on those individuals. PURPOSE: To develop a detailed, task-based questionnaire for quantifying an individual's annual noise exposure (ANE) arising from both occupational and nonoccupational sources (aim 1) and to develop a short screening tool that could be used to identify individuals at high risk of NIHL (aim 2). RESEARCH DESIGN: Review of relevant literature for questionnaire development followed by a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational investigation of the newly developed questionnaire and screening tool. STUDY SAMPLE: One hundred fourteen college freshmen completed the detailed questionnaire for estimating ANE (aim 1) and answered the potential screening questions (aim 2). An additional 59 adults participated in data collection where the accuracy of the screening tool was evaluated (aim 2). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: In study aim 1, all participants completed the detailed questionnaire and the potential screening questions. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify participant participation in various noisy activities and their associated ANE estimates. In study aim 2, linear regression techniques were used to identify screening questions that could be used to predict a participant's estimated ANE. Clinical decision theory was then used to assess the accuracy with which the screening tool predicted high and low risk of NIHL in a new group of participants. RESULTS: Responses on the detailed questionnaire indicated that our sample of college freshmen reported high rates of participation in a variety of occupational and nonoccupational activities associated with high sound levels. Although participation rates were high, ANE estimates were below highest-risk levels for many participants because the frequency of participation in these activities was low in many cases. These data illustrate how the Noise Exposure Questionnaire (NEQ) could be used to provide detailed and specific information regarding an individual's exposure to noise. The results of aim 2 suggest that the screening tool, the 1-Minute Noise Screen, can be used to identify those participants with high- and low-risk noise exposure, allowing more in-depth assessment of noise exposure history to be targeted at those most at risk. CONCLUSIONS: The NEQ can be used to estimate an individual's ANE and the 1-Minute Noise Screen can be used to identify those participants at highest risk of NIHL. These tools allow audiologists to focus hearing conservation efforts on those individuals who are most in need of those services. American Academy of Audiology
BACKGROUND: Exposure to both occupational and nonoccupational noise is recognized as a risk factor for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Although audiologists routinely inquire regarding history of noise exposure, there are limited tools available for quantifying this history or for identifying those individuals who are at highest risk for NIHL. Identifying those at highest risk would allow hearing conservation activities to be focused on those individuals. PURPOSE: To develop a detailed, task-based questionnaire for quantifying an individual's annual noise exposure (ANE) arising from both occupational and nonoccupational sources (aim 1) and to develop a short screening tool that could be used to identify individuals at high risk of NIHL (aim 2). RESEARCH DESIGN: Review of relevant literature for questionnaire development followed by a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational investigation of the newly developed questionnaire and screening tool. STUDY SAMPLE: One hundred fourteen college freshmen completed the detailed questionnaire for estimating ANE (aim 1) and answered the potential screening questions (aim 2). An additional 59 adults participated in data collection where the accuracy of the screening tool was evaluated (aim 2). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: In study aim 1, all participants completed the detailed questionnaire and the potential screening questions. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify participant participation in various noisy activities and their associated ANE estimates. In study aim 2, linear regression techniques were used to identify screening questions that could be used to predict a participant's estimated ANE. Clinical decision theory was then used to assess the accuracy with which the screening tool predicted high and low risk of NIHL in a new group of participants. RESULTS: Responses on the detailed questionnaire indicated that our sample of college freshmen reported high rates of participation in a variety of occupational and nonoccupational activities associated with high sound levels. Although participation rates were high, ANE estimates were below highest-risk levels for many participants because the frequency of participation in these activities was low in many cases. These data illustrate how the Noise Exposure Questionnaire (NEQ) could be used to provide detailed and specific information regarding an individual's exposure to noise. The results of aim 2 suggest that the screening tool, the 1-Minute Noise Screen, can be used to identify those participants with high- and low-risk noise exposure, allowing more in-depth assessment of noise exposure history to be targeted at those most at risk. CONCLUSIONS: The NEQ can be used to estimate an individual's ANE and the 1-Minute Noise Screen can be used to identify those participants at highest risk of NIHL. These tools allow audiologists to focus hearing conservation efforts on those individuals who are most in need of those services. American Academy of Audiology
Authors: N Fallentin; B Juul-Kristensen; S Mikkelsen; J H Andersen; J P Bonde; P Frost; L Endahl Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Jesper H Schmidt; Ellen R Pedersen; Helene M Paarup; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Ture Andersen; Torben Poulsen; Jesper Bælum Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Courtney L Ridley; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Daniel M Rasetshwane Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2018 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Lei Yan; Zhou Chen; Yunfeng Zou; Xuhui He; Chenzhi Cai; Kehui Yu; Xiaojie Zhu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Douglas S Brungart; Mary E Barrett; Jaclyn Schurman; Benjamin Sheffield; Leilani Ramos; Roberta Martorana; Hector Galloza Journal: Trends Hear Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.293
Authors: Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor DeGruttola; Daniel B Polley Journal: Elife Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 8.140