Literature DB >> 32659614

Evaluation of cochlear activity in normal-hearing musicians.

Nilesh J Washnik1, Ishan Sunilkumar Bhatt2, Susan L Phillips3, Denise Tucker3, Scott Richter4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study compared wave I amplitude of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), a potential indicator of cochlear synaptopathy, among musicians and non-musicians with normal audiograms.
DESIGN: Noise exposure background (NEB) was evaluated using an online questionnaire. Two-channel ABRs were recorded from the left ear using click stimuli. One channel utilized an ipsilateral tiptrode, and another channel utilized an ipsilateral mastoid electrode. ABRs were collected at 90, 75, and 60 dBnHL. A mixed model was used to analyze the effect of group, electrodes, and stimulus levels on ABR wave I amplitude. STUDY SAMPLE: 75 collegiate students with normal hearing participated in the study and were grouped into a non-music major group (n = 25), a brass major group (n = 25), and a voice major group (n = 25).
RESULTS: The NEB was negatively associated with the action potential (AP) and ABR wave I amplitude for click intensity levels at 75 dBnHL. The mean amplitude of the ABR wave I was not significantly different between the three groups.
CONCLUSION: The weak negative association of AP and ABR wave I amplitude with NEB cannot be solely attributed to evidence of cochlear synaptopathy in humans as the possibility of hair cell damage cannot be ruled out. Future research should investigate the effects of reduced cochlear output on the supra-threshold speech processing abilities of student musicians.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude; Auditory brainstem response (ABR); Brass majors; Hearing thresholds; Noise exposure; Non-musicians; Synaptopathy; Voice majors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32659614      PMCID: PMC7483999          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  52 in total

1.  Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss.

Authors:  D I McBride; S Williams
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Auditory risk assessment of college music students in jazz band-based instructional activity.

Authors:  Kamakshi V Gopal; Kris Chesky; Elizabeth A Beschoner; Paul D Nelson; Bradley J Stewart
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  Evaluation of dichotic listening performance in normal-hearing, noise-exposed young females.

Authors:  Ishan Sunilkumar Bhatt; Jin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Effects of noise on speech recognition: Challenges for communication by service members.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Odile H Clavier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Relationship between head size and latency of the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  J J Dempsey; E Censoprano; M Mazor
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1986

6.  Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem.

Authors:  T W Picton; D R Stapells; K B Campbell
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1981-08

8.  Noise Exposure Questionnaire: A Tool for Quantifying Annual Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Susan Cooper; Greta C Stamper; Mark Chertoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Letter to the Editor: Examination of Potential Sex Influences in . Auditory Function in Normal-Hearing, Noise-Exposed Human Ears, Ear Hear, 36, 172-184.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Characterizing synaptic protein development in human visual cortex enables alignment of synaptic age with rat visual cortex.

Authors:  Joshua G A Pinto; David G Jones; C Kate Williams; Kathryn M Murphy
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  3 in total

1.  AudioChip: A Deep Phenotyping Approach for Deconstructing and Quantifying Audiological Phenotypes of Self-Reported Speech Perception Difficulties.

Authors:  Ishan Sunilkumar Bhatt; Raquel Dias; Nathan Wineinger; Sheila Pratt; Jin Wang; Nilesh Washnik; O'neil Guthrie; Jason Wilder; Ali Torkamani
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Acute Recreational Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptic Dysfunction in Humans With Normal Hearing: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Qixuan Wang; Lu Yang; Minfei Qian; Yingying Hong; Xueling Wang; Zhiwu Huang; Hao Wu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Alexis Pinsonnault-Skvarenina; Karina Moïn-Darbari; Wulan Zhao; Meibian Zhang; Wei Qiu; Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.