Literature DB >> 15242844

Contributions of non-occupational activities to total noise exposure of construction workers.

Richard Neitzel1, Noah Seixas, Bryan Goldman, William Daniell.   

Abstract

This paper describes how exposures received during routine and episodic non-occupational activities contribute to total noise exposure in a group of occupationally exposed workers. Two-hundred and sixty-six construction apprentices enrolled in a longitudinal hearing loss study and completed questionnaires at 1 yr of follow-up to determine their episodic activities (e.g. concert attendance, power tool use, firearms exposure). Noise exposure levels for these episodic exposures were determined from the published literature. Routine activities were assessed using activity cards filled out over 530 subject-days, along with noise dosimetry measurements made over 124 subject-days of measurement. Equivalent Leq exposure levels were then calculated for specific activities. These activity-specific Leq values were combined into estimated individual annual Leq exposure levels for the 6760 nominal annual non-occupational hours in a year (LAeq6760h), which were then transformed into equivalent levels for a 2000 h exposure period (LA2000hn) for comparison with occupational noise exposure risk criteria. The mean non-occupational LAeq6760h exposure values for the cohort ranged from 56 to 87 dBA (equivalent LA2000hn 62-93 dBA). At the mid range of the routine and episodic activity exposure level distribution, the mean LAeq6760h was 73 dBA (LA2000hn 78 dBA). Nineteen percent of the LA2000hn non-occupational exposures exceeded 85 dBA, the generally recommended occupational limit for a 2000 h workyear, at the mid-range of exposure levels. Due to a lack of available data, firearms use could not be incorporated into the total noise exposure estimates. However, firearms users reported more exposure to other noisy non-occupational activities and had statistically significantly higher estimated exposure levels even without including their firearms exposure than did non-shooters. When compared with the high levels of occupational noise found in construction, non-occupational noise exposures generally present little additional exposure for most workers. However, they may contribute significantly to overall exposure in the subset of workers who frequently participate in selected noisy activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15242844     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meh041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  19 in total

1.  Mass transit ridership and self-reported hearing health in an urban population.

Authors:  Robyn R M Gershon; Martin F Sherman; Lori A Magda; Halley E Riley; Tara P McAlexander; Richard Neitzel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Pilot survey of subway and bus stop noise levels.

Authors:  Robyn R M Gershon; Richard Neitzel; Marissa A Barrera; Muhammad Akram
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Typical noise exposure in daily life.

Authors:  Gregory A Flamme; Mark R Stephenson; Kristy Deiters; Amanda Tatro; Devon van Gessel; Kyle Geda; Krista Wyllys; Kara McGregor
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry.

Authors:  M C J Leensen; J C van Duivenbooden; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss from Recreational Firearms.

Authors:  Deanna K Meinke; Donald S Finan; Gregory A Flamme; William J Murphy; Michael Stewart; James E Lankford; Stephen Tasko
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

6.  Leisure Noise and Hearing.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Beach
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

7.  Exposures to transit and other sources of noise among New York City residents.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Robyn R M Gershon; Tara P McAlexander; Lori A Magda; Julie M Pearson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Valuing Quiet: An Economic Assessment of U.S. Environmental Noise as a Cardiovascular Health Hazard.

Authors:  Tracy K Swinburn; Monica S Hammer; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Noise Exposure Questionnaire: A Tool for Quantifying Annual Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Susan Cooper; Greta C Stamper; Mark Chertoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.