Literature DB >> 18681585

Nature of orchestral noise.

Ian O'Brien1, Wayne Wilson, Andrew Bradley.   

Abstract

Professional orchestral musicians are at risk of exposure to excessive noise when at work. This is an industry-wide problem that threatens not only the hearing of orchestral musicians but also the way orchestras operate. The research described in this paper recorded noise levels within a professional orchestra over three years in order to provide greater insight to the orchestral noise environment; to guide future research into orchestral noise management and hearing conservation strategies; and to provide a basis for the future education of musicians and their managers. Every rehearsal, performance, and recording from May 2004 to May 2007 was monitored, with the woodwind, brass, and percussion sections monitored in greatest detail. The study recorded dBALEQ and dBC peak data, which are presented in graphical form with accompanying summarized data tables. The findings indicate that the principal trumpet, first and third horns, and principal trombone are at greatest risk of exposure to excessive sustained noise levels and that the percussion and timpani are at greatest risk of exposure to excessive peak noise levels. However, the findings also strongly support the notion that the true nature of orchestral noise is a great deal more complex than this simple statement would imply.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681585     DOI: 10.1121/1.2940589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

Review 1.  Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline; Florian Occelli; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Noise Exposure Questionnaire: A Tool for Quantifying Annual Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Susan Cooper; Greta C Stamper; Mark Chertoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Assessment of occupational personal sound exposures for music instructors.

Authors:  Kathryn Crawford; Nathan B Fethke; Thomas M Peters; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Parametric method for the noise risk assessment of professional orchestral musicians.

Authors:  Matteo Bo; Marina Clerico; Federica Pognant
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

6.  Noise exposure and auditory thresholds of military musicians: a follow up study.

Authors:  Reinhard Müller; Joachim Schneider
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds and Otoacoustic Emissions in Students of Music Academies.

Authors:  Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska; Małgorzata Zamojska-Daniszewska; Adam Dudarewicz; Kamil Zaborowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Sound Practice-improving occupational health and safety for professional orchestral musicians in Australia.

Authors:  Bronwen J Ackermann; Dianna T Kenny; Ian O'Brien; Tim R Driscoll
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-09

9.  A Role of Medial Olivocochlear Reflex as a Protection Mechanism from Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Revealed in Short-Practicing Violinists.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Minoru Tsuzaki; Junko Sonoda; Satomi Tanaka; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sound Exposure of Choristers.

Authors:  Stephen M Dance; Georgia Zepidou
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.