Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

× No keyword cloud information.

36 in total

1. What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors: Brian C Werner; Brenda Chang; Joseph T Nguyen; David M Dines; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 4.176

2. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors: Eugene J Carragee; Ivan Cheng
Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.166

3. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

Authors: J M Binkley; P W Stratford; S A Lott; D L Riddle
Journal: Phys Ther Date: 1999-04

4. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Authors: Juichi Tonosu; Katsushi Takeshita; Nobuhiro Hara; Ko Matsudaira; So Kato; Kazuhiro Masuda; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.134

5. Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement.

Authors: Ying-Chih Wang; Dennis L Hart; Paul W Stratford; Jerome E Mioduski
Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2011-03-03

6. Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease.

Authors: Robert Z Tashjian; Julia Deloach; Andrew Green; Christina A Porucznik; Amy P Powell
Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.284

7. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.

Authors: Amelia A Sorensen; Daniel Howard; Wen Hui Tan; Jeffrey Ketchersid; Ryan P Calfee
Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 2.230

8. Interpretation of the QuickDASH score after open carpal tunnel decompression: threshold values associated with patient satisfaction.

Authors: N D Clement; A D Duckworth; P J Jenkins; J E McEachan
Journal: J Hand Surg Eur Vol Date: 2016-01-07

9. Validation of the Mayo Hip Score: construct validity, reliability and responsiveness to change.

Authors: Jasvinder A Singh; Cathy Schleck; W Scott Harmsen; David G Lewallen
Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 2.362

10. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology.

Authors: Peter Tugwell; Maarten Boers; Peter Brooks; Lee Simon; Vibeke Strand; Leanne Idzerda
Journal: Trials Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 2.279

21 in total

1. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors: Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Vincent P Galea; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Ola Rolfson; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176

2. Value-based Health Care: Moving Beyond "Minimum Clinically Important Difference" to a Tiered System of Evaluating Successful Clinical Outcomes.

Authors: David N Bernstein; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Kevin J Bozic
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176

3. Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.

Authors: Seth S Leopold; Raphaël Porcher
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.176

4. Editorial: What is Narrative Medicine, and Why Should We Use it in Orthopaedic Practice?

Authors: Seth S Leopold
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.176

5. CORR Insights®: What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?

Authors: Mitchell Maltenfort
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.176

6. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors: Seth S Leopold
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176

7. Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors: Mark Alan Fontana; Stephen Lyman; Gourab K Sarker; Douglas E Padgett; Catherine H MacLean
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176

8. Functional outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) using uncemented distally loading femoral stem for failed fixation of proximal femoral nail - A case series.

Authors: Hemant H Mathur; Harsh S Shah; Karthik Vishwanathan
Journal: J Orthop Date: 2022-08-06

9. The minimal important change for the EQ VAS based on the SF-36 health transition item: observations from 25772 spine surgery procedures.

Authors: Anders Joelson; Fredrik Nerelius; Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Jan Karlsson
Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 3.440

10. Minimal clinically important differences in SF-36 global score: Current value in orthopedic oncology.

Authors: Koichi Ogura; Meredith K Bartelstein; Mohamed A Yakoub; Zarko Nikolic; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2020-12-20 Impact factor: 3.102