Literature DB >> 20124055

Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease.

Robert Z Tashjian1, Julia Deloach, Andrew Green, Christina A Porucznik, Amy P Powell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference is the smallest difference in an outcome score that a patient perceives as beneficial. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score for patients treated nonoperatively for rotator cuff disease.
METHODS: Eighty-one patients with tendinitis or a tear of the rotator cuff were treated with nonoperative modalities. Evaluation with the ASES score and the SST was performed at baseline and at a minimum of six weeks after treatment. At the follow-up evaluation, the minimal clinically important difference was estimated for the two scores with use of an anchor-based approach involving fifteen-item (pain and function) and four-item improvement questions.
RESULTS: The fifteen-item function and four-item assessments indicated, respectively, that a 2.05-point (p = 0.02) and 2.33-point (p = 0.0009) change in the SST score from baseline represented a minimal clinically important difference. The fifteen-item function, fifteen-item pain, and four-item assessments indicated that a 12.01-point (p = 0.03), 16.92-point (p = 0.004), and 16.72-point (p < 0.0001) change in the ASES score from baseline represented a minimal clinically important difference. Age, sex, initial baseline scores, and hand dominance had no effect on the minimal clinically important differences (p > 0.05). A longer duration of follow-up after treatment was associated with a greater minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score (p < 0.05), although the duration of follow-up had no effect on the minimal clinically important difference in the SST score.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rotator cuff disease who are treated without surgery and have a 2-point change in the SST score or a 12 to 17-point change in the ASES score experience a clinically important change in self-assessed outcome. These minimal clinically important differences can provide the basis for determining if significant differences in outcomes after treatment are clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20124055     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  77 in total

1.  What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Brenda Chang; Joseph T Nguyen; David M Dines; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: patient demographics and baseline shoulder function.

Authors:  Jay D Keener; Karen Steger-May; Georgia Stobbs; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Treatment of irreparable cuff tears with smoothing of the humeroscapular motion interface without acromioplasty.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; Jacob Gorbaty; Robert Lucas; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

Authors:  Mitchell Maltenfort; Claudio Díaz-Ledezma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair: technical note, outcomes, and complications.

Authors:  Eric M Black; Albert Lin; Uma Srikumaran; Nitin Jain; Michael T Freehill
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index.

Authors:  Bert M Chesworth; Clayon B Hamilton; David M Walton; Melissa Benoit; Tracy A Blake; Heather Bredy; Cameron Burns; Lianne Chan; Elizabeth Frey; Graham Gillies; Teresa Gravelle; Rick Ho; Robert Holmes; Roland L J Lavallée; Melanie MacKinnon; Alishah Jamal Merchant; Tammy Sherman; Kelly Spears; Darryl Yardley
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  One-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Do Not Correlate With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Erin K Granger; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Santiago Gonzalez-Parreño; Daniel Martinez-Mendez; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.

Authors:  Amelia A Sorensen; Daniel Howard; Wen Hui Tan; Jeffrey Ketchersid; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.