Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.

Literature DB >> 28124297

Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.

Seth S Leopold¹, Raphaël Porcher².

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2017 PMID： 28124297 PMCID： PMC5339159 DOI： 10.1007/s11999-017-5253-5

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res ISSN： 0009-921X Impact factor: 4.176

× No keyword cloud information.

14 in total

1. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

Authors: Ross D Crosby; Ronette L Kolotkin; G Rhys Williams
Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.437

2. Minimally clinically important improvement: all non-responders are not really non-responders an illustration from total knee replacement.

Authors: A M Davis; A V Perruccio; L S Lohmander
Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 6.576

3. The rise and fall of the "minimum clinically important difference".

Authors: Eugene J Carragee
Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.166

4. Significance testing - are we ready yet to abandon its use?

Authors: Bertram The
Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 2.580

5. Statistics in brief: Interpretation and use of p values: all p values are not equal.

Authors: Frederick Dorey
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.176

6. Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

Authors: Mitchell Maltenfort; Claudio Díaz-Ledezma
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 4.176

7. The prognosis for improvement in comfort and function after the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: an analysis of 176 consecutive cases.

Authors: Brian B Gilmer; Bryan A Comstock; Jocelyn L Jette; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins; Frederick A Matsen
Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 5.284

8. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors: Eugene J Carragee; Ivan Cheng
Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.166

9. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Authors: Steven D Glassman; Anne G Copay; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Brian R Subach; Leah Y Carreon
Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10. Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors: Sharan K Rai; Jinoos Yazdany; Paul R Fortin; J Antonio Aviña-Zubieta
Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.156

36 in total

1. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors: Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Vincent P Galea; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Ola Rolfson; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176

Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.

1. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

2. Minimally clinically important improvement: all non-responders are not really non-responders an illustration from total knee replacement.

3. The rise and fall of the "minimum clinically important difference".

4. Significance testing - are we ready yet to abandon its use?

5. Statistics in brief: Interpretation and use of p values: all p values are not equal.

6. Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

7. The prognosis for improvement in comfort and function after the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: an analysis of 176 consecutive cases.

8. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.

9. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Review 10. Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus.

1. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

2. CORR Insights^®: What is the Responsiveness and Respondent Burden of the New Knee Society Score?

3. Editorial: Threshold P Values in Orthopaedic Research-We Know the Problem. What is the Solution?

4. Editorial: Importance of Validating the Scores We Use to Assess Patients with Musculoskeletal Tumors.

5. CORR Insights®: What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?

6. CORR Insights®: What Are the Implications of Alternative Alpha Thresholds for Hypothesis Testing in Orthopaedics?

7. CORR Insights^®: Are Barbed Sutures Associated With 90-day Reoperation Rates After Primary TKA?

8. Editorial: Sparse-data Bias-What the Savvy Reader Needs to Know.

9. Editorial: The Opioid Epidemic and Orthopaedic Surgery-No Pain, Who Gains?

10. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?