Literature DB >> 33015618

Whole Breast Sound Speed Measurement from US Tomography Correlates Strongly with Volumetric Breast Density from Mammography.

Mark Sak1, Peter Littrup1, Rachel Brem2, Neb Duric1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using tissue sound speed as a quantitative marker of breast density.
METHODS: This study was carried out under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol (written consent required). Imaging data were selected retrospectively based on the availability of US tomography (UST) exams, screening mammograms with volumetric breast density data, patient age of 18 to 80 years, and weight less than 300 lbs. Sound speed images from the UST exams were used to measure the volume of dense tissue, the volume averaged sound speed (VASS), and the percent of high sound speed tissue (PHSST). The mammographic breast density and volume of dense tissue were estimated with three-dimensional (3D) software. Differences in volumes were assessed with paired t-tests. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the strength of the correlations between the mammographic and UST assessments of breast density.
RESULTS: A total of 100 UST and 3D mammographic data sets met the selection criteria. The resulting measurements showed that UST measured a more than 2-fold larger volume of dense tissue compared to mammography. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). A strong correlation of rS = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90) between 3D mammographic breast density (BD) and the VASS was noted. This correlation is significantly stronger than those reported in previous two-dimensional studies (rS = 0.85 vs rS = 0.71). A similar correlation was found for PHSST and mammographic BD with rS = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90).
CONCLUSION: The strong correlations between UST parameters and 3D mammographic BD suggest that breast sound speed should be further studied as a potential new marker for inclusion in clinical risk models. © Society of Breast Imaging 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  US tomography; breast cancer risk; breast density; sound speed

Year:  2020        PMID: 33015618      PMCID: PMC7513589          DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Imaging        ISSN: 2631-6110


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences.

Authors:  Daniel H-E Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Muqing Lin; Shadfar Bahri; Hon J Yu; Rita S Mehta; Ke Nie; David J B Hsiang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Current and Future Methods for Measuring Breast Density: A Brief Comparative Review.

Authors:  Mark A Sak; Peter J Littrup; Neb Duric; Maeve Mullooly; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-08-28

3.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Columnar cell lesions, mammographic density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Steven McKinney; Lisa Martin; Karen A Gelmon; Peter Watson; Norman Boyd; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulio Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Sonia Airaldi; Massimo Calabrese; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Reproducible automated breast density measure with no ionizing radiation using fat-water decomposition MRI.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Alison T Stopeck; Yi Gao; Marilyn T Marron; Betsy C Wertheim; Maria I Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Denise J Roe; Fang Wang; Gertraud Maskarinec; Cynthia A Thomson; Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Quantitative assessment of breast density using transmission ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  James Wiskin; Bilal Malik; Rajni Natesan; Mark Lenox
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A Case-Control Study to Add Volumetric or Clinical Mammographic Density into the Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Model.

Authors:  Adam R Brentnall; Wendy F Cohn; William A Knaus; Martin J Yaffe; Jack Cuzick; Jennifer A Harvey
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2019-05-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid Reductions in Breast Density following Tamoxifen Therapy as Evaluated by Whole-Breast Ultrasound Tomography.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Mark Sak; Shaoqi Fan; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Maya Palakal; Cody Ramin; Lisa Bey-Knight; Michael S Simon; David Gorski; Haythem Ali; Peter Littrup; Mark E Sherman; Nebojsa Duric
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.