Literature DB >> 9873918

A representation for mammographic image processing.

R Highnam1, M Brady, B Shepstone.   

Abstract

Mammographic image analysis is typically performed using standard, general-purpose algorithms. We note the dangers of this approach and show that an alternative physics-model-based approach can be developed to calibrate the mammographic imaging process. This enables us to obtain, at each pixel, a quantitative measure of the breast tissue. The measure we use is h(int) and this represents the thickness of 'interesting' (non-fat) tissue between the pixel and the X-ray source. The thicknesses over the image constitute what we term the h(int) representation, and it can most usefully be regarded as a surface that conveys information about the anatomy of the breast. The representation allows image enhancement through removing the effects of degrading factors, and also effective image normalization since all changes in the image due to variations in the imaging conditions have been removed. Furthermore, the h(int) representation gives us a basis upon which to build object models and to reason about breast anatomy. We use this ability to choose features that are robust to breast compression and variations in breast composition. In this paper we describe the h(int) representation, show how it can be computed, and then illustrate how it can be applied to a variety of mammographic image processing tasks. The breast thickness turns out to be a key parameter in the computation of h(int), but it is not normally recorded. We show how the breast thickness can be estimated from an image, and examine the sensitivity of h(int) to this estimate. We then show how we can simulate any projective X-ray examination and can simulate the appearance of anatomical structures within the breast. We follow this with a comparison between the h(int) representation and conventional representations with respect to invariance to imaging conditions and the surrounding tissue. Initial results indicate that image analysis is far more robust when specific consideration is taken of the imaging process and the h(int) representation is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9873918     DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(01)80002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI.

Authors:  Hui Li; William A Weiss; Milica Medved; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; Jeff Wang; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven R Cummings; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  An automatic correction method for the heel effect in digitized mammography images.

Authors:  Marcelo Zanchetta do Nascimento; Annie France Frère; Fernao Germano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  X-ray phase-shifts-based method of volumetric breast density measurement.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Aimin Yan; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Research in digital mammography and tomosynthesis at the University of Toronto.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-25

9.  Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Elisa Regini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Gianluca Ghione; Andrea Luparia; Pier Paolo Campanino; Caterina Chiara Bianchi; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.

Authors:  O Alonzo-Proulx; N Packard; J M Boone; A Al-Mayah; K K Brock; S Z Shen; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.