Literature DB >> 28041872

Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis and fracture risk assessment; WHO-criteria, T- and Z-score, and reference databases.

Hans P Dimai1.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a two-dimensional imaging technology developed to assess bone mineral density (BMD) of the entire human skeleton and also specifically of skeletal sites known to be most vulnerable to fracture. In order to simplify interpretation of BMD measurement results and allow comparability among different DXA-devices, the T-score concept was introduced. This concept involves an individual's BMD which is then compared with the mean value of a young healthy reference population, with the difference expressed as a standard deviation (SD). Since the early nineties of the past century, the diagnostic categories "normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis", as recommended by a WHO working Group, are based on this concept. Thus, DXA is still the globally accepted "gold-standard" method for the noninvasive diagnosis of osteoporosis. Another score obtained from DXA measurement, termed Z-score, describes the number of SDs by which the BMD in an individual differs from the mean value expected for age and sex. Although not intended for diagnosis of osteoporosis in adults, it nevertheless provides information about an individual's fracture risk compared to peers. DXA measurement can either be used as a "stand-alone" means in the assessment of an individual's fracture risk, or incorporated into one of the available fracture risk assessment tools such as FRAX® or Garvan, thus improving the predictive power of such tools. The issue which reference databases should be used by DXA-device manufacturers for T-score reference standards has been recently addressed by an expert group, who recommended use National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) databases for the hip reference standard but own databases for the lumbar spine. Furthermore, in men it is recommended use female reference databases for calculation of the T-score and use male reference databases for calculation of Z-score.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; Reference databases; T-score; WHO-criteria; Z-score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041872     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  43 in total

1.  Noninvasive Imaging of Bone Microarchitecture in Patients Receiving Renal Transplant: Can it Replace Histology?

Authors:  Maria Coco; James M Pullman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Underestimated fracture risk in postmenopausal women-application of the hybrid intervention threshold.

Authors:  Y Wang; S Yu; C Hsu; C Tsai; T Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Incidental bilateral calcaneal fractures following overground walking with a wearable robotic exoskeleton in a wheelchair user with a chronic spinal cord injury: is zero risk possible?

Authors:  A Bass; S N Morin; M Vermette; M Aubertin-Leheudre; D H Gagnon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  The Effect of Exercise for the Prevention of Bone Mass After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Florêncio Diniz-Sousa; Giorjines Boppre; Lucas Veras; Alba Hernández-Martínez; José Oliveira; Hélder Fonseca
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Deep Radiomics-based Approach to the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Hip Radiographs.

Authors:  Sangwook Kim; Bo Ram Kim; Hee-Dong Chae; Jimin Lee; Sung-Joon Ye; Dong Hyun Kim; Sung Hwan Hong; Ja-Young Choi; Hye Jin Yoo
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-25

8.  Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Luca Petruccio Piodi; Luca Rinaudo; Ciriaco Buonomenna; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Laura Vergani; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  An Unusual Pattern of Premature Cervical Spine Degeneration in STAT3-LOF.

Authors:  Amelia L Mitchell; Amanda K Urban; Alexandra F Freeman; Dima A Hammoud
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 8.317

10.  Formation Dominates Resorption With Increasing Mineralized Density and Time Postfracture in Cortical but Not Trabecular Bone: A Longitudinal HRpQCT Imaging Study in the Distal Radius.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Kerstin Stock; Nicholas Ohs; Caitlyn J Collins; Lukas Horling; Stefan Benedikt; Gerald Degenhart; Kurt Lippuner; Michael Blauth; Patrik Christen; Ralph Müller
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.