Literature DB >> 28039998

Effects of spectral smearing on performance of the spectral ripple and spectro-temporal ripple tests.

Vijaya Kumar Narne1, Mridula Sharma2, Bram Van Dun3, Shalini Bansal4, Latika Prabhu4, Brian C J Moore5.   

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to use spectral smearing to evaluate the efficacy of a spectral ripple test (SRt) using stationary sounds and a recent variant with gliding ripples called the spectro-temporal ripple test (STRt) in measuring reduced spectral resolution. In experiment 1 the highest detectable ripple density was measured using four amounts of spectral smearing (unsmeared, mild, moderate, and severe). The thresholds worsened with increasing smearing and were similar for the SRt and the STRt across the three conditions with smearing. For unsmeared stimuli, thresholds were significantly higher (better) for the STRt than for the SRt. An amplitude fluctuation at the outputs of simulated (gammatone) auditory filters centered above 6400 Hz was identified as providing a potential detection cue for the STRt stimuli. Experiment 2 used notched noise with energy below and above the passband of the SRt and STRt stimuli to reduce confounding cues in the STRt. Thresholds were almost identical for the STRt and SRt for both unsmeared and smeared stimuli, indicating that the confounding cue for the STRt was eliminated by the notched noise. Thresholds obtained with notched noise present could be predicted reasonably accurately using an excitation-pattern model.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28039998     DOI: 10.1121/1.4971419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.245

2.  Distortion of Spectral Ripples Through Cochlear Implants Has Major Implications for Interpreting Performance Scores.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Gabrielle O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Aaron C Moberly; Ben L Hamel; Kara Vasil; Christina L Runge; William J Riggs; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Rosy V Southwell; John M Deeks; Richard E Turner; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ripple density resolution dependence on ripple width.

Authors:  Alexander Ya Supin; Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Marina S Tomozova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Reaction Time Sensitivity to Spectrotemporal Modulations of Sound.

Authors:  Lidwien C E Veugen; A John van Opstal; Marc M van Wanrooij
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

8.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Susannah Dixon; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; Marti Weiner
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.