| Literature DB >> 28035485 |
Wenhui Wang1, Qiuwei Pan2, Gwenny M Fuhler2, Ron Smits2, Maikel P Peppelenbosch2.
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide but the mechanistic basis as to how chronic HCV infection furthers the HCC process remains only poorly understood. Accumulating evidence indicates that HCV core and nonstructural proteins provoke activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and the evidence supporting a role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the onset and progression of HCC is compelling. Convincing molecular explanations as to how expression of viral effectors translates into increased activity of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling machinery are still largely lacking, hampering the design of rational strategies aimed at preventing HCC. Furthermore, how such increased signaling is especially associated with HCC oncogenesis in the context of HCV infection remains obscure as well. Here we review the body of contemporary biomedical knowledge on the role of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the progression from chronic hepatitis C to cirrhosis and HCC and explore potential hypotheses as to the mechanisms involved.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatitis C virus; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Wnt/β-catenin signaling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28035485 PMCID: PMC5357489 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-016-1299-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gastroenterol ISSN: 0944-1174 Impact factor: 7.527
Genetic mutation in components of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma
| References | Patients | Mutant samples | Region | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Rebouissou et al. [ | 373 | 146 (39%) | NA | NA | NA | France, Spain, Italy |
| Hirotsu et al. [ | 9 | 2 (22.2%) | NA | NA | NA | Japan |
| Schulze et al. [ | 243 | 95 (37.4%) | 27 (11.1%) | 3 (1.2%) | 4 (1.6%) | France, Italy, Spain |
| Kan et al. [ | 88 | 14 (15.9%) | 4 (4.5%) | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.3%) | China |
| Kitao et al. [ | 134 | 27 (20.1%) | NA | NA | NA | Japan |
| Ding et al. [ | 156 | 15 (9.6%) | NA | NA | NA | China |
| Tornesello et al. [ | 67 | 10 (14.9%) | NA | NA | NA | Southern Italy |
| Cleary et al. [ | 87 | 20 (22.9%) | NA | NA | NA | Canada, USA |
| Guichard et al. [ | 125 | 41 (32.8%) | 19 (15.2%) | NA | 2 (1.6%) | France |
| Lachenmayer et al. [ | 90 | 29 (32.2%) | NA | NA | NA | USA, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Germany |
| Li et al. [ | 139 | 28 (20.1%) | NA | NA | NA | USA, Netherlands, China |
| Cieply et al. [ | 32 | 9 (28.1%) | NA | NA | NA | USA |
| Bengochea et al. [ | 62 | 16 (25.8%) | NA | NA | NA | Thailand, France |
| Austinat et al. [ | 40 | 10 (25%) | 2 (5%) | NA | NA | Germany |
| Kim et al. [ | 36 | 1 (2.8%) | 9 (25%) | NA | NA | Korea |
| Zucman-Rossi et al. [ | 45 | 18 (40%) | 5 (11.1%) | NA | NA | France |
| Boyault et al. [ | 120 | 34 (28.3%) | 13 (10.8%) | NA | NA | France |
| Zucman-Rossi et al. [ | 96 | 12 (12.5%) | NA | NA | NA | France |
| Park et al. [ | 81 | 13 (16%) | 5 (6.2%) | NA | NA | Korea |
| Ishizaki et al. [ | 89 | 10 (11.2%) | 13 (14.6) | 9 (10.1%) | NA | Japan |
| Cui et al. [ | 34 | 15 (44.1%) | NA | NA | NA | China |
| Edamoto et al. [ | 100 | 24 (24%) | NA | NA | 0 | Japan, Switzerland |
| Taniguchi et al. [ | 73 | 14 (19.2%) | 7 (9.6%) | 2 (2.7%) | NA | UK |
| Wong et al. [ | 60 | 7 (11.7%) | NA | NA | NA | China |
| Mao et al. [ | 262 | 37 (14.1%) | NA | NA | NA | Taiwan |
| Cui et al. [ | 34 | 15 (44.1%) | NA | NA | NA | China |
| Laurent–Puig et al. [ | 137 | 26 (19%) | 12 (8.8%) | NA | NA | France |
| Devereux et al. [ | 62 | 5 (8.1%) | NA | NA | NA | China |
| Hsu et al. [ | 434 | 57 (13.1%) | NA | NA | NA | Taiwan |
| Satoh et al. [ | 87 | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.7%) | NA | NA | Japan |
| Huang et al. [ | 22 | 9 (41%) | NA | NA | NA | Japan, Switzerland |
| Legoix et al. [ | 119 | 21 (17.6%) | NA | NA | NA | France |
| Terris et al. [ | 73 | 14 (19.2%) | NA | NA | NA | France |
| Kondo et al. [ | 38 | 9 (24%) | NA | NA | NA | Japan |
| Van Nhieu et al. [ | 35 | 12 (34.3%) | NA | NA | NA | France |
| Miyoshi et al. [ | 75 | 14 (18.7%) | NA | NA | NA | Japan |
| de La Coste et al. [ | 31 | 8 (25.8%) | NA | NA | NA | France |
| Total | 3788 | 837 (22.1%) | 121 (3.2%) | 16 (0.4%) | 8 (0.2%) | |
NA not analyzed
Comparison of CTNNB1 mutation in subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma
| References |
| Mutation type | Amino acid | Region | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCV | HBV | NV | ||||
| Hirotsu et al. [ | 2/5 (40%) | 0/1 (0%) | 0/3 (0%) | Missense | Gly34, His36 | Japan |
| Kitao et al. [ | 12/55 (21.8%) | 4/34 (11.8%) | 11/44 (25%) | NA | NA | Japan |
| Ding et al. [ | NA | 12/110 (10.9%) | 3/46 (6.5%) | Missense | Asp32, Gly34, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | China |
| Tornesello et al. [ | 10/57 (17.5%) | 0/10 (0%) | NA | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34 Ile35, Ser37, Ser45 | Southern Italy |
| Kan et al. [ | NA | 12/81 (14.8%) | NA | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34 Ile35, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | China |
| Guichard et al. [ | 8/24 (33.3%) | 4/35 (11.4%) | 30/80 (37.5%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Ser37, Thr41,Thr42, Ser45 | France |
| Li et al. [ | 14/45 (31.1%) | 6/52 (11.5%) | 9/44 (20.5%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34, His36, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45, Asn387 | USA, Netherlands, China |
| Bengochea et al. [ | 8/20 (40%) | 3/18 (16.7%) | 5/24 (20.8%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Ser37, Thr41 Ser45 | Thailand, France |
| Kim et al. [ | 0/4 (0%) | 0/21 (0%) | 1/14 (7.1%) | Missense | Ser33 | China |
| Park et al. [ | 0/6 (0%) | 13/78 (16.7%) | NA | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34 Ile35, His36, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | Korea |
| Edamoto et al. [ | 16/51 (31.4%) | 5/26 (19.2%) | 3/23 (13%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, His36, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | Japan, Switzerland |
| Wong et al. [ | 0/2 (0%) | 5/48 (10.4%) | 2/10 (20%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34 Ile35, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | China |
| Hsu et al. [ | 23/92 (25%) | 30/323 (9.3%) | 4/19 (21.1%) | Missense | Asp32, Gly34, | Taiwan |
| Huang et al. [ | 9/22 (41%) | NA | NA | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Ser37, | Japan, Switzerland |
| Legoix et al. [ | 7/30 (23.3%) | 5/26 (19.2%) | 13/64 (20.3%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | France |
| Terris et al. [ | 2/7 (28.6) | 3/14 (21.4) | 9/52 (17.3) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34, Ser37, Ser45 | France |
| Kondo et al. [ | 7/22 (31.8%) | 1/8 (12.5%) | 1/9 (11.1%) | Missense | Asp32, Ser33, Gly34, Ile35, His36, Ser37, Thr41, Ser45 | Japan |
| Total | 118/442 (26.7%) | 103/885 (11.6%) | 91/432 (21.1%) | |||
HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, NA not analyzed, NV not viral
Fig. 1Summary of CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations in hepatitis C virus related hepatocellular carcinoma. The locations of the CTNNB1 mutations reported in 68 tumors from 65 hepatocellular carcinoma patients (one tumor with p.D32_G48del, not shown) are illustrated. N-terminal serine and threonine phosphorylation residues are indicated in bold. Numbers in parentheses are the absolute number of tumors tested with the given mutation
Fig. 2Wnt/β-catenin signaling is activated by hepatitis C virus (HCV) proteins. HCV core protein elevates gene expression of Wnt ligands, frizzled (FZD) receptor, and low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6) but decreases the expression of the Wnt antagonists dickkopf (DKK) and secreted frizzled-related protein (SFRP) by recruiting DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) to their transcription start sites. In addition, HCV core protein releases β-catenin from the β-catenin–E-cadherin complexes by suppression of the CDH1 gene promoter (which encodes E-cadherin). NS5A protein activates phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling, leading to the inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) and subsequent reduced breakdown of β-catenin, or directly stabilizes β-catenin. The overall effect is the cytoplasmic accumulation of β-catenin and stimulation of downstream transcription
Fig. 3Cross talk of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathways in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV promotes Wnt signaling as well as the EGFR and FGF pathways. The the Wnt/β-catenin and EGFR pathways activate each other. Binding of Wnt ligands with frizzled (FZD) receptors transactivates EGFR signaling by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-mediated release of soluble EGFR ligands. EGFR signaling transactivates Wnt/β-catenin signaling through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (Erk) pathways but also by releasing β-catenin from β-catenin–E-cadherin complexes as a result of Tyr654 phosphorylation. Activated β-catenin forms heterodimers with EGFR and in turn promotes the EGFR pathway. On the other hand, Wnt signaling stimulates FGF signaling by inducing FGF18 and FGF20 ligand expression. In turn, the association of FGF19 with FGFR leads to the release of β-catenin from the β-catenin–E-cadherin complexes. FGF2 signaling inhibits glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) activity through the PI3K/Akt and Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk pathways. Activated Src homology region 2 domain containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2) in the PI3K/Akt pathway and the Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk pathway dephosphorylates parafibromin, which acquires the ability to bind β-catenin stably, overriding the repression effect on CYCLIND1 and MYC expression and triggering downstream signaling