J T Schousboe1,2, T N Vo3, L Langsetmo3, B C Taylor3,4,5, A M Kats3,4,5, A V Schwartz6, D C Bauer6,7, J A Cauley8, K E Ensrud3,4,5. 1. Park Nicollet Clinic and HealthPartners Institute, 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd., Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA. scho0600@umn.edu. 2. Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. scho0600@umn.edu. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Center for Chronic Diseases Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 8. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
Among older men, characteristics that predict longitudinal changes in trabecular bone score (TBS) are different from characteristics that predict changes in bone mineral density (BMD). Most notably, weight loss is strongly associated with concomitant loss in BMD but with concomitant increases in TBS, when measured on Hologic densitometers. INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to compare and contrast predictors of changes in TBS, total hip BMD, and lumbar spine BMD. METHODS: Our study population was 3969 Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) cohort participants (mean age 72.8 years) with repeat measures of TBS, lumbar spine and total hip BMD, body mass index (BMI) less than 37 kg/m2, and no use of bisphosphonate or glucocorticoid medications. TBS was scored (Med-Imaps Software version 2.1) and BMD measured on Hologic densitometers. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred forty-four men had a TBS decrease > 0.04 units (estimated least significant change for TBS), 795 men had a TBS increase > 0.04 units, and 1730 men had TBS change ≤ 0.04 units over mean follow-up of 4.6 years. Older age was not associated with TBS change, but was associated with greater decline in lumbar spine and total hip BMD. Compared to stable weight, > 10% weight loss was strongly associated with an increase in TBS [effect size = 1.24 (95% CI 1.12, 1.36)] and strongly associated with a decrease in total hip BMD [- 1.16 (95% CI - 1.19, - 1.03)]. Other predictors discordant for longitudinal changes of TBS and BMD included baseline BMI, walk speed, and ACE inhibitor use. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of changes in TBS are different from predictors of changes in lumbar spine and total hip BMD. At least when assessed on Hologic densitometers, weight loss is associated with subsequent declines in spine and total hip BMD but subsequent increase in TBS. Faster walk speed may protect against loss of hip BMD, but is not associated with longitudinal changes of TBS.
Among older men, characteristics that predict longitudinal changes in trabecular bone score (TBS) are different from characteristics that predict changes in bone mineral density (BMD). Most notably, weight loss is strongly associated with concomitant loss in BMD but with concomitant increases in TBS, when measured on Hologic densitometers. INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to compare and contrast predictors of changes in TBS, total hip BMD, and lumbar spine BMD. METHODS: Our study population was 3969 Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) cohort participants (mean age 72.8 years) with repeat measures of TBS, lumbar spine and total hip BMD, body mass index (BMI) less than 37 kg/m2, and no use of bisphosphonate or glucocorticoid medications. TBS was scored (Med-Imaps Software version 2.1) and BMD measured on Hologic densitometers. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred forty-four men had a TBS decrease > 0.04 units (estimated least significant change for TBS), 795 men had a TBS increase > 0.04 units, and 1730 men had TBS change ≤ 0.04 units over mean follow-up of 4.6 years. Older age was not associated with TBS change, but was associated with greater decline in lumbar spine and total hip BMD. Compared to stable weight, > 10% weight loss was strongly associated with an increase in TBS [effect size = 1.24 (95% CI 1.12, 1.36)] and strongly associated with a decrease in total hip BMD [- 1.16 (95% CI - 1.19, - 1.03)]. Other predictors discordant for longitudinal changes of TBS and BMD included baseline BMI, walk speed, and ACE inhibitor use. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of changes in TBS are different from predictors of changes in lumbar spine and total hip BMD. At least when assessed on Hologic densitometers, weight loss is associated with subsequent declines in spine and total hip BMD but subsequent increase in TBS. Faster walk speed may protect against loss of hip BMD, but is not associated with longitudinal changes of TBS.
Entities:
Keywords:
BMD; Bone mineral density; Longitudinal change; TBS; Trabecular bone score; Weight loss
Authors: Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Gillian Mazzetti; Claudie Berger; William D Leslie; Didier Hans; Lisa Langsetmo; David A Hanley; Christopher S Kovacs; Jerrilyn C Prior; Stephanie M Kaiser; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou; Jonathan R Adachi; David Goltzman; Suzanne N Morin Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: John T Schousboe; Tien N Vo; Lisa Langsetmo; Brent C Taylor; Peggy M Cawthon; Ann V Schwartz; Douglas C Bauer; Eric S Orwoll; Nancy E Lane; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Howard A Fink; Susan K Ewing; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Brent C Taylor; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ann V Schwartz; Anne L Schafer; Andrew Grey; Eric Vittinghoff; Lisa Palermo; Li-Yung L Lui; Robert B Wallace; Steven R Cummings; Dennis M Black; Douglas C Bauer; Ian R Reid Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: A Ishani; M Paudel; B C Taylor; E Barrett-Connor; S Jamal; M Canales; M Steffes; H A Fink; E Orwoll; S R Cummings; K E Ensrud Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-04-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ludmila Brunerová; Petr Kasalický; Jana Verešová; Renata Lažanská; Jana Potočková; Ivan Rychlík Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 2.370