Literature DB >> 28028774

Embryo wastage rates remain high in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a look at the trends from 2004-2013 in the USA.

Sanaz Ghazal1, Pasquale Patrizio2.   

Abstract

This work examined the trend in "embryo wastage" rates after ART in USA and its relationship to the number of embryos transferred, live born infants delivered across patient age, and the yearly percentage of embryos wasted. The data were obtained from the US-clinics SART databank for the years 2004-2013. A total of 1,808,082 non-donor embryos were transferred in 748,394 fresh cycles resulting in 358,214 liveborn. During the years of analysis, the mean number of embryos transferred has progressively decreased leading to an overall significant decrease in Embryo Wastage rates (83.2 to 76.5%, p < 0.001) while the percentage of transfers leading to a live born increased (24.8 to 27.8%, p = 0.002). Embryo Wastage negatively correlated with percentage of transfers resulting in live birth (p = 0.001), and the average number of embryos transferred positively correlated with the percentage of embryos wasted (p < 0.001). The overwhelming majority of embryos transferred still do not result into a live birth confirming that only few embryos per ART cycle are competent. The overall "Embryo Wastage" rates have consistently decreased from a high of 90% in 1995 to a rate of 76.5% in 2013. Transferring fewer embryos particularly at the blastocyst-stage and improved methods of embryo selection may further decrease "Embryo Wastage" rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; Blastocysts; Delivery rate; Embryo Wastage; Embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028774      PMCID: PMC5306416          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0858-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  44 in total

1.  Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Healthy Babies after Intrauterine Transfer of Mosaic Aneuploid Blastocysts.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M F G Verberg; M J C Eijkemans; N S Macklon; E M E W Heijnen; E B Baart; F P Hohmann; B C J M Fauser; F J Broekmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 4.  Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Aishling Ahlström; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Thorir Hardarson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Blastocyst culture selects for euploid embryos: comparison of blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies.

Authors:  Alexis Adler; Hsaio-Ling Lee; David H McCulloh; Esmeralda Ampeloquio; Melicia Clarke-Williams; Brooke Hodes Wertz; James Grifo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 6.  The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Relationship between embryo morphology and implantation rate after in vitro fertilization treatment in conception cycles.

Authors:  A Shulman; I Ben-Nun; Y Ghetler; H Kaneti; M Shilon; Y Beyth
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Alteration of gene expression in human cumulus cells as a potential indicator of oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Dagan Wells; Amy E Iager; Umit A Kayisli; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Debbie Blake; Cindy Farquhar; Ariel Bardach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 10.  The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome.

Authors:  M G Katz-Jaffe; S McReynolds; D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cumulative live birth and surplus embryo incidence after frozen-thaw cycles in PCOS: how many oocytes do we need?

Authors:  Yuan-Hui Chen; Qian Wang; Ya-Nan Zhang; Xiao Han; Dong-Han Li; Cui-Lian Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Mitochondrial DNA and genomic DNA ratio in embryo culture medium is not a reliable predictor for in vitro fertilization outcome.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhang; Yue Sun; Xin Dong; Jianming Zhou; Fubo Sun; Tingting Han; Ping Lei; Rurong Mao; Xuzhou Guo; Qi Wang; Penghao Li; Ting Qu; Jihua Huang; Lingxiao Li; Tianhua Huang; Ying Zhong; Jiang Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Spontaneous blastocyst collapse as an embryo marker of low pregnancy outcome: A Time-Lapse study.

Authors:  Romualdo Sciorio; K J Thong; Susan J Pickering
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-01-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.