| Literature DB >> 24090365 |
Hong-Ying Gao1, Jian Huang, Hang-Yu Wang, Xiao-Wei Du, Suo-Ming Cheng, Ying Han, Li-Fei Wang, Guo-Yu Li, Jin-Hui Wang.
Abstract
The study first evaluated the hepatoprotective effect of Zhuyeqing Liquor (ZYQL) against acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice. Animals were administered orally with 50% alcohol 12 ml/kg at 4 h after the doses of ZYQL everyday for fourteen consecutive days except mice in normal group. The protective effect was evaluated by biochemical parameters including serum aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transferase (ALT), total-bilirubin (TBIL) and reduced glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) in liver tissue. The result were confirmed histopathologically and the expression of TNF-α in mice liver was determined by immunohistochemistry analysis. HPLC-PDA was used for phytochemical analysis of ZYQL, and the plant source of each compound was claritied by UPLC-TOF-MS. The result showed that pretreatment with ZYQL exhibited a significant protective effect by reversing the biochemical parameters and histopathological changes in a dose depended manner. HPLC analysis indicated that ZYQL contained flavonoids, iridoids, terpenoids and phenolic acids, which might be the active chemicals. This study demonstrated the hepatoprotective activity of ZYQL, thus scientifically supported the function of its health care.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24090365 PMCID: PMC3851207 DOI: 10.1186/1476-9255-10-30
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inflamm (Lond) ISSN: 1476-9255 Impact factor: 4.981
Figure 1Chromatograms of Zhuyeqing Liquor (ZYQL) and the standard reference. (A) HPLC-PDA chromatogram of ZYQL monitored at 254 nm; (B) HPLC-PDA chromatogram of standard reference monitored at 254 nm. (C) Representative UPLC-TOF-MS positive ion mode chromatogram (From up to down: Compound 33, Zhizi, Shannai, Zhuyeqing Liquor).
Effect of ZYQL on organ coefficient in acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice
| Control | - | 4.41 ± 0.53 | 1.46 ± 0.16 | 0.22 ± 0.07 |
| Alcohol | - | 5.14 ± 0.27a | 1.40 ± 0.17 | 0.29 ± 0.11 |
| ZYQL-High | 200 | 4.29 ± 0.83c | 1.45 ± 0.15 | 0.23 ± 0.05 |
| ZYQL-Medium | 100 | 4.56 ± 1.02 | 1.46 ± 0.13 | 0.24 ± 0.07 |
| ZYQL-Low | 50 | 4.58 ± 0.82 | 1.44 ± 0.09 | 0.27 ± 0.03 |
| Bifendate | 150 | 4.40 ± 0.35b | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.04 |
Values represent the mean ± S.D. The one-way ANOVA was performed on the raw data.
Significant difference at p < 0.05 levels compared with the control group.
Significant difference at p < 0.05 levels compared with alcohol treated group.
Significant difference at p < 0.01 levels compared with alcohol treated group.
Effect of ZYQL on ALT, AST and TBIL levels in acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice
| Control | - | 32.34 ± 8.81 | 44.81 ± 19.48 | 6.76 ± 0.73 |
| Alcohol | - | 66.03 ± 15.02a | 98.73 ± 18.29a | 21.62 ± 2.03a |
| ZYQL-High | 200 | 33.30 ± 9.40c | 47.47 ± 9.09c | 6.33 ± 1.95c |
| ZYQL-Medium | 100 | 34.85 ± 8.12c | 50.55 ± 11.07c | 9.84 ± 1.45c |
| ZYQL-Low | 50 | 46.16 ± 6.92b | 65.16 ± 10.33b | 12.59 ± 1.40b |
| Bifendate | 150 | 24.74 ± 5.30c | 47.27 ± 8.95c | 6.96 ± 1.41c |
Values represent the mean ± S.D. The one-way ANOVA was performed on the raw data.
Significant difference at p < 0.01 levels compared with the control group.
Significant difference at p < 0.05 levels compared with alcohol treated group.
Significant difference at p < 0.01 levels compared with alcohol treated group.
IU/L.
μmol/L.
Effect of ZYQL on MDA, SOD and GSH levels in acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice
| Control | - | 3.72 ± 1.09 | 301.68 ± 24.93 | 4.34 ± 1.33 |
| Alcohol | - | 9.04 ± 1.48a | 188.30 ± 22.89a | 0.85 ± 0.30a |
| ZYQL-High | 200 | 4.41 ± 1.23c | 290.56 ± 15.13c | 3.73 ± 1.53c |
| ZYQL-Medium | 100 | 5.63 ± 1.1 c | 255.49 ± 12.16c | 2.02 ± 1.10b |
| ZYQL-Low | 50 | 7.58 ± 1.79b | 215.86 ± 6.41b | 1.64 ± 0.70 |
| Bifendate | 150 | 4.60 ± 0.97c | 267.56 ± 26.13c | 2.58 ± 0.91c |
Values represent the mean ± S.D. The one-way ANOVA was performed on the raw data.
Significant difference at p < 0.01 levels compared with the control group.
Significant difference at p < 0.05 levels compared with alcohol treated group.
Significant difference at p < 0.01 levels compared with alcohol treated group.
nmol/mgprot.
U/mgprot.
mg/gprot.
Figure 2Hepatoprotective effect of Zhuyeqing Liquor on Alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Liver sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (×100). (A) Normal control group; (B) Alcohol-induced group; (C), (D) and (E) are Alcohol group treated with 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg of ZYQL, respectively; (F) is Alcohol group treated with 150 mg/kg of Bifendate.
Figure 3Representative photographs of immunohistochemical localization of TNF-α in mice liver with Alcohol hepatotoxicity (×200). (A) Normal control group; (B) Alcohol-induced group; (C), (D) and (E) are Alcohol group treated with 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg of ZYQL, respectively; (F) is Alcohol group treated with 150 mg/kg of Bifendate.