Literature DB >> 28025585

Biparental care is predominant and beneficial to parents in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Kyle M Benowitz1, Allen J Moore1.   

Abstract

Parenting strategies can be flexible within a species, and may have varying fitness effects. Understanding this flexibility and its fitness consequences is important for understanding why parenting strategies evolve. Here, we investigate the fitness consequences of flexible parenting in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis, a species known for its advanced provisioning behaviour of regurgitated vertebrate carrion to offspring by both sexes. We show that even when a parent is freely allowed to abandon the carcass at any point in time, biparental post-hatching care is the most common pattern of care adopted in N. orbicollis. Furthermore, two parents together raised more offspring than single parents of either sex, showing that the presence of the male can directly influences parental fitness even in the absence of competitors. This contrasts with studies in other species of burying beetle, where biparental families do not differ in offspring number. This may explain why biparental care is more common in N. orbicollis than in other burying beetles. We suggest how fitness benefits of two parents may play a role in the evolution and maintenance of flexible biparental care in N. orbicollis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioural flexibility; biparental care; offspring performance; parental care; plasticity

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025585      PMCID: PMC5181846          DOI: 10.1111/bij.12830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond        ISSN: 0024-4066            Impact factor:   2.138


  22 in total

1.  Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates.

Authors:  John D Reynolds; Nicholas B Goodwin; Robert P Freckleton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Phylogenetic perspectives in the evolution of parental care in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Daniel E L Promislow; John C Avise
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Plasticity of parental care under the risk of predation: how much should parents reduce care?

Authors:  Cameron K Ghalambor; Susana I Peluc; Thomas E Martin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Mode of fertilization and parental care in anurans

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Parental care improves offspring survival and growth in burying beetles

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Why care? Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour.

Authors:  T Székely; V Remeš; R P Freckleton; A Liker
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Social role specialization promotes cooperation between parents.

Authors:  Zoltán Barta; Tamás Székely; András Liker; Freya Harrison
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  The evolution of parental care in insects: A test of current hypotheses.

Authors:  James D J Gilbert; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Male age mediates reproductive investment and response to paternity assurance.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Megan L Head; Camellia A Williams; Allen J Moore; Nick J Royle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relating quantitative variation within a behavior to variation in transcription.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Elizabeth C McKinney; Christopher B Cunningham; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Why does it take two to tango? Lifetime fitness consequences of parental care in a burying beetle.

Authors:  Ashlee N Smith; J Curtis Creighton; Mark C Belk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Variation in mandible development and its relationship to dependence on parents across burying beetles.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Madeline E Sparks; Elizabeth C McKinney; Patricia J Moore; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Sex-specific influence of communal breeding experience on parenting performance and fitness in a burying beetle.

Authors:  Long Ma; Maaike A Versteegh; Martijn Hammers; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Can age-related changes in parental care modulate inbreeding depression? A test using the burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Parker Hughes; Samuel Jenkins; Ian Kusher; Jonathan Lopez; Harriet Oglesby; Katie E McGhee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Constrained flexibility of parental cooperation limits adaptive responses to harsh conditions.

Authors:  Jeanette B Moss; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.