Literature DB >> 9480710

Mode of fertilization and parental care in anurans

.   

Abstract

Current hypotheses for explaining which sex cares for offspring assume a relationship between the mode of fertilization and the sex showing parental care. In general, it is hypothesized that maternal care should be concentrated in taxa with internal fertilization, and paternal care should be concentrated in taxa with external fertilization. Studies have supported this relationship; however, new comparative techniques and new data on parental care and the frequency of internal fertilization in anurans suggest that the relationship should be re-evaluated. I examined the relationship between mode of fertilization and sex providing parental care in 334 taxa of anurans using concentrated changes tests and in 396 taxa of anurans using a method developed by Ridley (1983. The Explanation of Organic Diversity. The Comparative Method and Adaptations of Mating. Oxford: Clarendon). The results of the concentrated changes tests showed that both female and male parental care are randomly distributed among taxa with respect to mode of fertilization. However, using Ridley's method, I found significant relationships between mode of fertilization and sex providing parental care. The observed and expected numbers of transitions from external fertilization and no parental care to external fertilization and male parental care or to internal fertilization and female parental care are not qualitatively different. Therefore, the results of my analyses suggest that current hypotheses for explaining the occurrence of maternal versus paternal care in anurans should be reconsidered. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Year:  1998        PMID: 9480710     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  9 in total

1.  Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates.

Authors:  John D Reynolds; Nicholas B Goodwin; Robert P Freckleton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The evolution of parental care and egg size: a comparative analysis in frogs.

Authors:  Kyle Summers; Christian Sea McKeon; Heather Heying
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Parental care and the evolution of terrestriality in frogs.

Authors:  Balázs Vági; Zsolt Végvári; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Biparental care is predominant and beneficial to parents in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.138

5.  The evolution of parental care in salamanders.

Authors:  Balázs Vági; Daniel Marsh; Gergely Katona; Zsolt Végvári; Robert P Freckleton; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  The evolution of parental care in insects: A test of current hypotheses.

Authors:  James D J Gilbert; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sex differences in life history drive evolutionary transitions among maternal, paternal, and bi-parental care.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The origin of parental care in relation to male and female life history.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Population-Level Density Dependence Influences the Origin and Maintenance of Parental Care.

Authors:  Elijah Reyes; Patsy Thrasher; Michael B Bonsall; Hope Klug
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.