Literature DB >> 23663057

Why care? Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour.

T Székely1, V Remeš, R P Freckleton, A Liker.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic comparative analyses of complex traits often reduce the traits of interests into a single (or a few) component variables. Here, we show that this may be an over-simplification, because components of a complex trait may evolve independently from each other. Using eight components of parental care in 400 bird species from 89 avian families that represent the relative contribution of male vs. female to a particular type of care, we show that some components evolve in a highly correlated manner, whereas others exhibit low (or no) phylogenetic correlation. Correlations were stronger within types of parental activity (brooding, feeding, guarding) than within stages of the breeding cycle (incubation, prefledging care, post-fledging care). A phylogenetically corrected cluster analysis identified two groups of parental care components that evolved in a correlated fashion: one group included incubation and brooding, whereas the other group comprised of the remaining components. The two groups of components provide working hypotheses for follow-up studies to test the underlying genetic, developmental and ecological co-evolutionary mechanism between male and female care. Furthermore, the components within each group are expected to respond consistently to different ambient and social environments.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2013 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Keywords:  birds; character evolution; parental care; parental investment; phylogenetic comparative methods; sex role

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663057     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  13 in total

1.  Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Dóra Kötél; Miklós Laczi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  The evolution of parental cooperation in birds.

Authors:  Vladimír Remeš; Robert P Freckleton; Jácint Tökölyi; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Parental care and the evolution of terrestriality in frogs.

Authors:  Balázs Vági; Zsolt Végvári; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds.

Authors:  Tamás Székely; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Claudia Fichtel; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Sexual conflict between parents: offspring desertion and asymmetrical parental care.

Authors:  Tamás Székely
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Biparental care is predominant and beneficial to parents in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.138

7.  Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Judit Mokos; István Scheuring; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The evolution of parental care in salamanders.

Authors:  Balázs Vági; Daniel Marsh; Gergely Katona; Zsolt Végvári; Robert P Freckleton; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  The role of neuropeptide F in a transition to parental care.

Authors:  Christopher B Cunningham; Kathryn VanDenHeuvel; Daven B Khana; Elizabeth C McKinney; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Local environment but not genetic differentiation influences biparental care in ten plover populations.

Authors:  Orsolya Vincze; Tamás Székely; Clemens Küpper; Monif Alrashidi; Juan A Amat; Araceli Argüelles Ticó; Daniel Burgas; Terry Burke; John Cavitt; Jordi Figuerola; Mohammed Shobrak; Tomas Montalvo; András Kosztolányi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.