Literature DB >> 16153042

Phylogenetic perspectives in the evolution of parental care in ray-finned fishes.

Judith E Mank1, Daniel E L Promislow, John C Avise.   

Abstract

Among major vertebrate groups, ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) collectively display a nearly unrivaled diversity of parental care activities. This fact, coupled with a growing body of phylogenetic data for Actinopterygii, makes these fishes a logical model system for analyzing the evolutionary histories of alternative parental care modes and associated reproductive behaviors. From an extensive literature review, we constructed a supertree for ray-finned fishes and used its phylogenetic topology to investigate the evolution of several key reproductive states including type of parental care (maternal, paternal, or biparental), internal versus external fertilization, internal versus external gestation, nest construction behavior, and presence versus absence of sexual dichromatism (as an indicator of sexual selection). Using a comparative phylogenetic approach, we critically evaluate several hypotheses regarding evolutionary pathways toward parental care. Results from maximum parsimony reconstructions indicate that all forms of parental care, including paternal, biparental, and maternal (both external and internal to the female reproductive tract) have arisen repeatedly and independently during ray-finned fish evolution. The most common evolutionary transitions were from external fertilization directly to paternal care and from external fertilization to maternal care via the intermediate step of internal fertilization. We also used maximum likelihood phylogenetic methods to test for statistical correlations and contingencies in the evolution of pairs of reproductive traits. Sexual dichromatism and nest construction proved to be positively correlated with the evolution of male parental care in species with external fertilization. Sexual dichromatism was also positively correlated with female-internal fertilization and gestation. No clear indication emerged that female-only care or biparental care were evolutionary outgrowths of male-only care, or that biparental care has been a common evolutionary stepping stone between paternal and maternal care. Results are discussed in the context of prior thought about the evolution of alternative parental care modes in vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  37 in total

1.  Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Cladogenetic correlates of genomic expansions in the recent evolution of actinopterygiian fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; David W Hall; Mark Kirkpatrick; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Coevolution influences the evolution of filial cannibalism, offspring abandonment and parental care.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Parental care and the evolution of terrestriality in frogs.

Authors:  Balázs Vági; Zsolt Végvári; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Understanding the origin of number sense: a review of fish studies.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.

Authors:  Michael D Jennions; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  The developmental support hypothesis: adaptive plasticity in neural development in response to cues of social support.

Authors:  Emilie Snell-Rood; Claire Snell-Rood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.